Participatory research with carers: A systematic review and narrative synthesis

Abstract Introduction As patient and public involvement (PPI) in research has become increasingly common, research‐based recommendations on its principles and impacts have been established. The specifics of conducting PPI are likely to differ when involving different groups. Family/informal carers f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bryher Bowness, Claire Henderson, Samia C. Akhter Khan, Mia Akiba, Vanessa Lawrence
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-02-01
Series:Health Expectations
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13940
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849227392518717440
author Bryher Bowness
Claire Henderson
Samia C. Akhter Khan
Mia Akiba
Vanessa Lawrence
author_facet Bryher Bowness
Claire Henderson
Samia C. Akhter Khan
Mia Akiba
Vanessa Lawrence
author_sort Bryher Bowness
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction As patient and public involvement (PPI) in research has become increasingly common, research‐based recommendations on its principles and impacts have been established. The specifics of conducting PPI are likely to differ when involving different groups. Family/informal carers for those with health conditions or disabilities have a lot to contribute to research, but instances of their involvement have yet to be reviewed. Objective To systematically review and synthesize studies where family/informal carers have been involved in the research process, to develop an understanding of the benefits, barriers and facilitating factors. Methods A search of five electronic databases was conducted using a combination of terms relating to carers, involvement and research. A grey literature search, expert consultation and hand‐searching were also used. Following screening, data extraction and quality assessment, a narrative synthesis incorporating thematic analysis was conducted. Findings A total of 55 studies met the inclusion criteria, with diverse design and participatory approaches. Four themes were identified, relating to the outcomes, challenges, and practicalities of involving carers: (re) building relationships with carers; carers as equals not afterthoughts; carers have unique experiences; carers create change. Full involvement throughout the research was not always possible, due to barriers from the research world and responsibilities of the caring role. The literature demonstrated ways for carers to contribute in ways that suited them, maximizing their impact, while attending to relationships and power imbalances. Conclusion By summarizing the reported instances of carer involvement in research, this review brings together different examples of how successful research partnerships can be built with carers, despite various challenges. Carers are a heterogeneous group, and participatory approaches should be tailored to specific situations. Wider understanding of the challenges of conducting empowering research with carers, and the resources required to address these, are needed. Patient and Public Involvement The initial findings and themes were presented to a group of carers who had been involved in research and whose reflections informed the final synthesis.
format Article
id doaj-art-d1b41ebca35d4a60a23d0aa243458e1a
institution Kabale University
issn 1369-6513
1369-7625
language English
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Health Expectations
spelling doaj-art-d1b41ebca35d4a60a23d0aa243458e1a2025-08-23T11:53:04ZengWileyHealth Expectations1369-65131369-76252024-02-01271n/an/a10.1111/hex.13940Participatory research with carers: A systematic review and narrative synthesisBryher Bowness0Claire Henderson1Samia C. Akhter Khan2Mia Akiba3Vanessa Lawrence4King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience London UKKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience London UKDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine King's College London London UKKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience London UKKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience London UKAbstract Introduction As patient and public involvement (PPI) in research has become increasingly common, research‐based recommendations on its principles and impacts have been established. The specifics of conducting PPI are likely to differ when involving different groups. Family/informal carers for those with health conditions or disabilities have a lot to contribute to research, but instances of their involvement have yet to be reviewed. Objective To systematically review and synthesize studies where family/informal carers have been involved in the research process, to develop an understanding of the benefits, barriers and facilitating factors. Methods A search of five electronic databases was conducted using a combination of terms relating to carers, involvement and research. A grey literature search, expert consultation and hand‐searching were also used. Following screening, data extraction and quality assessment, a narrative synthesis incorporating thematic analysis was conducted. Findings A total of 55 studies met the inclusion criteria, with diverse design and participatory approaches. Four themes were identified, relating to the outcomes, challenges, and practicalities of involving carers: (re) building relationships with carers; carers as equals not afterthoughts; carers have unique experiences; carers create change. Full involvement throughout the research was not always possible, due to barriers from the research world and responsibilities of the caring role. The literature demonstrated ways for carers to contribute in ways that suited them, maximizing their impact, while attending to relationships and power imbalances. Conclusion By summarizing the reported instances of carer involvement in research, this review brings together different examples of how successful research partnerships can be built with carers, despite various challenges. Carers are a heterogeneous group, and participatory approaches should be tailored to specific situations. Wider understanding of the challenges of conducting empowering research with carers, and the resources required to address these, are needed. Patient and Public Involvement The initial findings and themes were presented to a group of carers who had been involved in research and whose reflections informed the final synthesis.https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13940caregivingcarerscodesigncommunity‐based participatory researchhealth and social care researchpatient and public involvement
spellingShingle Bryher Bowness
Claire Henderson
Samia C. Akhter Khan
Mia Akiba
Vanessa Lawrence
Participatory research with carers: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
Health Expectations
caregiving
carers
codesign
community‐based participatory research
health and social care research
patient and public involvement
title Participatory research with carers: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_full Participatory research with carers: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_fullStr Participatory research with carers: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Participatory research with carers: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_short Participatory research with carers: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_sort participatory research with carers a systematic review and narrative synthesis
topic caregiving
carers
codesign
community‐based participatory research
health and social care research
patient and public involvement
url https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13940
work_keys_str_mv AT bryherbowness participatoryresearchwithcarersasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT clairehenderson participatoryresearchwithcarersasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT samiacakhterkhan participatoryresearchwithcarersasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT miaakiba participatoryresearchwithcarersasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT vanessalawrence participatoryresearchwithcarersasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis