Phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses reveal major differences between apple and pear scab nonhost resistance

Nonhost resistance is the outcome of most plant/pathogen interactions, but it has rarely been described in Rosaceous fruit species. Apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) have a nonhost resistance to Venturia pyrina, the scab species attacking European pear (Pyrus communis L.). Reciprocally, P. communis h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vergne, Emilie, Chevreau, Elisabeth, Ravon, Elisa, Gaillard, Sylvain, Pelletier, Sandra, Bahut, Muriel, Perchepied, Laure
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peer Community In 2023-01-01
Series:Peer Community Journal
Online Access:https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.225/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825206438018940928
author Vergne, Emilie
Chevreau, Elisabeth
Ravon, Elisa
Gaillard, Sylvain
Pelletier, Sandra
Bahut, Muriel
Perchepied, Laure
author_facet Vergne, Emilie
Chevreau, Elisabeth
Ravon, Elisa
Gaillard, Sylvain
Pelletier, Sandra
Bahut, Muriel
Perchepied, Laure
author_sort Vergne, Emilie
collection DOAJ
description Nonhost resistance is the outcome of most plant/pathogen interactions, but it has rarely been described in Rosaceous fruit species. Apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) have a nonhost resistance to Venturia pyrina, the scab species attacking European pear (Pyrus communis L.). Reciprocally, P. communis have a nonhost resistance to Venturia inaequalis, the scab species attacking apple. The major objective of our study was to compare the scab nonhost resistance in apple and in European pear, at the phenotypic and transcriptomic levels.  Macro- and microscopic observations after reciprocal scab inoculations indicated that, after a similar germination step, nonhost apple/V. pyrina interaction remained nearly symptomless, whereas more hypersensitive reactions were observed during nonhost pear/V. inaequalis interaction. Comparative transcriptomic analyses of apple and pear nonhost interactions with V. pyrina and V. inaequalis, respectively, revealed differences. Very few differentially expressed genes were detected during apple/V. pyrina interaction, preventing the inferring of underlying molecular mechanisms. On the contrary, numerous genes were differentially expressed during pear/V. inaequalis interaction, allowing a deep deciphering. Pre-invasive defense, such as stomatal closure, could be inferred, as well as several post-invasive defense mechanisms (apoplastic reactive oxygen species accumulation, phytoalexin production and alterations of the epidermis composition). In addition, a comparative analysis between pear scab host and nonhost interactions indicated that, although specificities were observed, two major defense lines seems to be shared in these resistances: cell wall and cuticle potential modifications and phenylpropanoid pathway induction. This first deciphering of the molecular mechanisms underlying a nonhost scab resistance in pear offers new possibilities for the genetic engineering of sustainable scab resistance in this species. Concerning nonhost scab resistance in apple, further analyses must be considered with the aid of tools adapted to this resistance with very few cells engaged.
format Article
id doaj-art-d19f05b572144ed19057fe3a4c80769b
institution Kabale University
issn 2804-3871
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Peer Community In
record_format Article
series Peer Community Journal
spelling doaj-art-d19f05b572144ed19057fe3a4c80769b2025-02-07T10:16:50ZengPeer Community InPeer Community Journal2804-38712023-01-01310.24072/pcjournal.22510.24072/pcjournal.225Phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses reveal major differences between apple and pear scab nonhost resistanceVergne, Emilie0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9280-8688Chevreau, Elisabeth1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6644-4956Ravon, Elisa2Gaillard, Sylvain3Pelletier, Sandra4Bahut, Muriel5Perchepied, Laure6Univ Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 – Angers, FranceUniv Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 – Angers, FranceUniv Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 – Angers, FranceUniv Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 – Angers, FranceUniv Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 – Angers, FranceUniv Angers, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 – Angers, FranceUniv Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR QUASAV, F-49000 – Angers, FranceNonhost resistance is the outcome of most plant/pathogen interactions, but it has rarely been described in Rosaceous fruit species. Apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) have a nonhost resistance to Venturia pyrina, the scab species attacking European pear (Pyrus communis L.). Reciprocally, P. communis have a nonhost resistance to Venturia inaequalis, the scab species attacking apple. The major objective of our study was to compare the scab nonhost resistance in apple and in European pear, at the phenotypic and transcriptomic levels.  Macro- and microscopic observations after reciprocal scab inoculations indicated that, after a similar germination step, nonhost apple/V. pyrina interaction remained nearly symptomless, whereas more hypersensitive reactions were observed during nonhost pear/V. inaequalis interaction. Comparative transcriptomic analyses of apple and pear nonhost interactions with V. pyrina and V. inaequalis, respectively, revealed differences. Very few differentially expressed genes were detected during apple/V. pyrina interaction, preventing the inferring of underlying molecular mechanisms. On the contrary, numerous genes were differentially expressed during pear/V. inaequalis interaction, allowing a deep deciphering. Pre-invasive defense, such as stomatal closure, could be inferred, as well as several post-invasive defense mechanisms (apoplastic reactive oxygen species accumulation, phytoalexin production and alterations of the epidermis composition). In addition, a comparative analysis between pear scab host and nonhost interactions indicated that, although specificities were observed, two major defense lines seems to be shared in these resistances: cell wall and cuticle potential modifications and phenylpropanoid pathway induction. This first deciphering of the molecular mechanisms underlying a nonhost scab resistance in pear offers new possibilities for the genetic engineering of sustainable scab resistance in this species. Concerning nonhost scab resistance in apple, further analyses must be considered with the aid of tools adapted to this resistance with very few cells engaged. https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.225/
spellingShingle Vergne, Emilie
Chevreau, Elisabeth
Ravon, Elisa
Gaillard, Sylvain
Pelletier, Sandra
Bahut, Muriel
Perchepied, Laure
Phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses reveal major differences between apple and pear scab nonhost resistance
Peer Community Journal
title Phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses reveal major differences between apple and pear scab nonhost resistance
title_full Phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses reveal major differences between apple and pear scab nonhost resistance
title_fullStr Phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses reveal major differences between apple and pear scab nonhost resistance
title_full_unstemmed Phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses reveal major differences between apple and pear scab nonhost resistance
title_short Phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses reveal major differences between apple and pear scab nonhost resistance
title_sort phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses reveal major differences between apple and pear scab nonhost resistance
url https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.225/
work_keys_str_mv AT vergneemilie phenotypicandtranscriptomicanalysesrevealmajordifferencesbetweenappleandpearscabnonhostresistance
AT chevreauelisabeth phenotypicandtranscriptomicanalysesrevealmajordifferencesbetweenappleandpearscabnonhostresistance
AT ravonelisa phenotypicandtranscriptomicanalysesrevealmajordifferencesbetweenappleandpearscabnonhostresistance
AT gaillardsylvain phenotypicandtranscriptomicanalysesrevealmajordifferencesbetweenappleandpearscabnonhostresistance
AT pelletiersandra phenotypicandtranscriptomicanalysesrevealmajordifferencesbetweenappleandpearscabnonhostresistance
AT bahutmuriel phenotypicandtranscriptomicanalysesrevealmajordifferencesbetweenappleandpearscabnonhostresistance
AT perchepiedlaure phenotypicandtranscriptomicanalysesrevealmajordifferencesbetweenappleandpearscabnonhostresistance