Specific bone region localization of osteolytic versus osteoblastic lesions in a patient-derived xenograft model of bone metastatic prostate cancer

Objective: Bone metastasis occurs in up to 90% of men with advanced prostate cancer and leads to fractures, severe pain and therapy-resistance. Bone metastases induce a spectrum of types of bone lesions which can respond differently to therapy even within individual prostate cancer patients. Thus, t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takeshi Hirata, Seung Chol Park, Michelle T. Muldong, Christina N. Wu, Tomonori Yamaguchi, Amy Strasner, Omer Raheem, Hiromi Kumon, Robert L. Sah, Nicholas A. Cacalano, Catriona H.M. Jamieson, Christopher J. Kane, Koichi Masuda, Anna A. Kulidjian, Christina A.M. Jamieson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-10-01
Series:Asian Journal of Urology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214388216300613
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850229718430777344
author Takeshi Hirata
Seung Chol Park
Michelle T. Muldong
Christina N. Wu
Tomonori Yamaguchi
Amy Strasner
Omer Raheem
Hiromi Kumon
Robert L. Sah
Nicholas A. Cacalano
Catriona H.M. Jamieson
Christopher J. Kane
Koichi Masuda
Anna A. Kulidjian
Christina A.M. Jamieson
author_facet Takeshi Hirata
Seung Chol Park
Michelle T. Muldong
Christina N. Wu
Tomonori Yamaguchi
Amy Strasner
Omer Raheem
Hiromi Kumon
Robert L. Sah
Nicholas A. Cacalano
Catriona H.M. Jamieson
Christopher J. Kane
Koichi Masuda
Anna A. Kulidjian
Christina A.M. Jamieson
author_sort Takeshi Hirata
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Bone metastasis occurs in up to 90% of men with advanced prostate cancer and leads to fractures, severe pain and therapy-resistance. Bone metastases induce a spectrum of types of bone lesions which can respond differently to therapy even within individual prostate cancer patients. Thus, the special environment of the bone makes the disease more complicated and incurable. A model in which bone lesions are reproducibly induced that mirrors the complexity seen in patients would be invaluable for pre-clinical testing of novel treatments. The microstructural changes in the femurs of mice implanted with PCSD1, a new patient-derived xenograft from a surgical prostate cancer bone metastasis specimen, were determined. Methods: Quantitative micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and histological analyses were performed to evaluate the effects of direct injection of PCSD1 cells or media alone (Control) into the right femurs of Rag2−/−γc−/− male mice. Results: Bone lesions formed only in femurs of mice injected with PCSD1 cells. Bone volume (BV) was significantly decreased at the proximal and distal ends of the femurs (p < 0.01) whereas BV (p < 0.05) and bone shaft diameter (p < 0.01) were significantly increased along the femur shaft. Conclusion: PCSD1 cells reproducibly induced bone loss leading to osteolytic lesions at the ends of the femur, and, in contrast, induced aberrant bone formation leading to osteoblastic lesions along the femur shaft. Therefore, the interaction of PCSD1 cells with different bone region-specific microenvironments specified the type of bone lesion. Our approach can be used to determine if different bone regions support more therapy resistant tumor growth, thus, requiring novel treatments. Keywords: Bone metastatic prostate cancer, Patient-derived xenograft, Bone microenvironment, Microstructural CT, Osteolytic lesions, Osteoblastic lesions
format Article
id doaj-art-d195ba8d9f63409e98fe8b47e7c19eb8
institution OA Journals
issn 2214-3882
language English
publishDate 2016-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Asian Journal of Urology
spelling doaj-art-d195ba8d9f63409e98fe8b47e7c19eb82025-08-20T02:04:06ZengElsevierAsian Journal of Urology2214-38822016-10-013422923910.1016/j.ajur.2016.09.001Specific bone region localization of osteolytic versus osteoblastic lesions in a patient-derived xenograft model of bone metastatic prostate cancerTakeshi Hirata0Seung Chol Park1Michelle T. Muldong2Christina N. Wu3Tomonori Yamaguchi4Amy Strasner5Omer Raheem6Hiromi Kumon7Robert L. Sah8Nicholas A. Cacalano9Catriona H.M. Jamieson10Christopher J. Kane11Koichi Masuda12Anna A. Kulidjian13Christina A.M. Jamieson14Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, JapanDepartment of Urology, Wonkwang University School of Medicine and Hospital, Iksan, South KoreaMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USAMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USAMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USADepartment of Urology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USADepartment of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, JapanDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USAMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USAMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USAMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USAMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Corresponding author. Department of Urology, Department of Surgery, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.Objective: Bone metastasis occurs in up to 90% of men with advanced prostate cancer and leads to fractures, severe pain and therapy-resistance. Bone metastases induce a spectrum of types of bone lesions which can respond differently to therapy even within individual prostate cancer patients. Thus, the special environment of the bone makes the disease more complicated and incurable. A model in which bone lesions are reproducibly induced that mirrors the complexity seen in patients would be invaluable for pre-clinical testing of novel treatments. The microstructural changes in the femurs of mice implanted with PCSD1, a new patient-derived xenograft from a surgical prostate cancer bone metastasis specimen, were determined. Methods: Quantitative micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and histological analyses were performed to evaluate the effects of direct injection of PCSD1 cells or media alone (Control) into the right femurs of Rag2−/−γc−/− male mice. Results: Bone lesions formed only in femurs of mice injected with PCSD1 cells. Bone volume (BV) was significantly decreased at the proximal and distal ends of the femurs (p < 0.01) whereas BV (p < 0.05) and bone shaft diameter (p < 0.01) were significantly increased along the femur shaft. Conclusion: PCSD1 cells reproducibly induced bone loss leading to osteolytic lesions at the ends of the femur, and, in contrast, induced aberrant bone formation leading to osteoblastic lesions along the femur shaft. Therefore, the interaction of PCSD1 cells with different bone region-specific microenvironments specified the type of bone lesion. Our approach can be used to determine if different bone regions support more therapy resistant tumor growth, thus, requiring novel treatments. Keywords: Bone metastatic prostate cancer, Patient-derived xenograft, Bone microenvironment, Microstructural CT, Osteolytic lesions, Osteoblastic lesionshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214388216300613
spellingShingle Takeshi Hirata
Seung Chol Park
Michelle T. Muldong
Christina N. Wu
Tomonori Yamaguchi
Amy Strasner
Omer Raheem
Hiromi Kumon
Robert L. Sah
Nicholas A. Cacalano
Catriona H.M. Jamieson
Christopher J. Kane
Koichi Masuda
Anna A. Kulidjian
Christina A.M. Jamieson
Specific bone region localization of osteolytic versus osteoblastic lesions in a patient-derived xenograft model of bone metastatic prostate cancer
Asian Journal of Urology
title Specific bone region localization of osteolytic versus osteoblastic lesions in a patient-derived xenograft model of bone metastatic prostate cancer
title_full Specific bone region localization of osteolytic versus osteoblastic lesions in a patient-derived xenograft model of bone metastatic prostate cancer
title_fullStr Specific bone region localization of osteolytic versus osteoblastic lesions in a patient-derived xenograft model of bone metastatic prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Specific bone region localization of osteolytic versus osteoblastic lesions in a patient-derived xenograft model of bone metastatic prostate cancer
title_short Specific bone region localization of osteolytic versus osteoblastic lesions in a patient-derived xenograft model of bone metastatic prostate cancer
title_sort specific bone region localization of osteolytic versus osteoblastic lesions in a patient derived xenograft model of bone metastatic prostate cancer
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214388216300613
work_keys_str_mv AT takeshihirata specificboneregionlocalizationofosteolyticversusosteoblasticlesionsinapatientderivedxenograftmodelofbonemetastaticprostatecancer
AT seungcholpark specificboneregionlocalizationofosteolyticversusosteoblasticlesionsinapatientderivedxenograftmodelofbonemetastaticprostatecancer
AT michelletmuldong specificboneregionlocalizationofosteolyticversusosteoblasticlesionsinapatientderivedxenograftmodelofbonemetastaticprostatecancer
AT christinanwu specificboneregionlocalizationofosteolyticversusosteoblasticlesionsinapatientderivedxenograftmodelofbonemetastaticprostatecancer
AT tomonoriyamaguchi specificboneregionlocalizationofosteolyticversusosteoblasticlesionsinapatientderivedxenograftmodelofbonemetastaticprostatecancer
AT amystrasner specificboneregionlocalizationofosteolyticversusosteoblasticlesionsinapatientderivedxenograftmodelofbonemetastaticprostatecancer
AT omerraheem specificboneregionlocalizationofosteolyticversusosteoblasticlesionsinapatientderivedxenograftmodelofbonemetastaticprostatecancer
AT hiromikumon specificboneregionlocalizationofosteolyticversusosteoblasticlesionsinapatientderivedxenograftmodelofbonemetastaticprostatecancer
AT robertlsah specificboneregionlocalizationofosteolyticversusosteoblasticlesionsinapatientderivedxenograftmodelofbonemetastaticprostatecancer
AT nicholasacacalano specificboneregionlocalizationofosteolyticversusosteoblasticlesionsinapatientderivedxenograftmodelofbonemetastaticprostatecancer
AT catrionahmjamieson specificboneregionlocalizationofosteolyticversusosteoblasticlesionsinapatientderivedxenograftmodelofbonemetastaticprostatecancer
AT christopherjkane specificboneregionlocalizationofosteolyticversusosteoblasticlesionsinapatientderivedxenograftmodelofbonemetastaticprostatecancer
AT koichimasuda specificboneregionlocalizationofosteolyticversusosteoblasticlesionsinapatientderivedxenograftmodelofbonemetastaticprostatecancer
AT annaakulidjian specificboneregionlocalizationofosteolyticversusosteoblasticlesionsinapatientderivedxenograftmodelofbonemetastaticprostatecancer
AT christinaamjamieson specificboneregionlocalizationofosteolyticversusosteoblasticlesionsinapatientderivedxenograftmodelofbonemetastaticprostatecancer