Comparing commercial and slow-growing broilers in Thailand: growth, carcass quality, economics, and environmental perspective

Various aspects were compared of commercial and slow-growing broiler chickens in Thailand. In total, 416 one-day-old chicks of a commercial strain (COM) and a slow-growing strain (SG) were assigned equally to four experimental groups separated by strain and sex with 8 replications per group, using a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Panatda Bungsrisawat, Surasek Tunseng, Savek Kiatsomphob, Sombat Prasongsook, Chaiyapoom Bunchasak, Choawit Rakangthong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-04-01
Series:Poultry Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579125001178
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850204893997957120
author Panatda Bungsrisawat
Surasek Tunseng
Savek Kiatsomphob
Sombat Prasongsook
Chaiyapoom Bunchasak
Choawit Rakangthong
author_facet Panatda Bungsrisawat
Surasek Tunseng
Savek Kiatsomphob
Sombat Prasongsook
Chaiyapoom Bunchasak
Choawit Rakangthong
author_sort Panatda Bungsrisawat
collection DOAJ
description Various aspects were compared of commercial and slow-growing broiler chickens in Thailand. In total, 416 one-day-old chicks of a commercial strain (COM) and a slow-growing strain (SG) were assigned equally to four experimental groups separated by strain and sex with 8 replications per group, using a 2 × 2 factorial in a completely randomized design. All birds were fed according to the recommended diets for each strain and sex, with the endpoint of the study at a final body weight of 2.5 kg/bird for each group. Growth performance parameters were assessed, and a separate digestibility study was conducted to evaluate nutrient intake, excretion, and retention, with a focus on assessing environmental impacts. The COM strain groups had a highly significant greater growth rate with lower feed intake and a better feed conversion ratio compared to SG strain groups, while the mortality rate did not differ between groups. The COM strain had a higher breast muscle yield, whereas SG produced significantly higher amounts of thighs and drumsticks. Furthermore, the feed ingredient ratios for energy (corn), protein (soybean meal), and phosphorus were lower in COM than for SG. The COM male broiler group had a significantly higher nitrogen digestion rate, with lower intake and excretion of nitrogen and phosphorus compared to SG. Economically, the COM strain groups had a lower feed cost than SG strain groups by approximately 16 % compared to SG, while the feed cost of COM was lower by 8 % in males and 23 % in females than for the equivalent SG groups. The interaction of strain and sex was highly significant in carbon emissions. The COM male group had lower carbon emissions compared to COM female, SG male, and SG female groups, which were 5.17 %, 11.73 %, and 31.25 %, respectively. In conclusion, raising commercial broiler chickens appeared to be more sustainable, effective and economic with a better environmental impact than raising slow-growing broiler chickens. This study did not evaluate welfare indicators, which should be addressed in future research.
format Article
id doaj-art-d18fad196c574382ab49d2baafd71c3a
institution OA Journals
issn 0032-5791
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Poultry Science
spelling doaj-art-d18fad196c574382ab49d2baafd71c3a2025-08-20T02:11:12ZengElsevierPoultry Science0032-57912025-04-01104410488010.1016/j.psj.2025.104880Comparing commercial and slow-growing broilers in Thailand: growth, carcass quality, economics, and environmental perspectivePanatda Bungsrisawat0Surasek Tunseng1Savek Kiatsomphob2Sombat Prasongsook3Chaiyapoom Bunchasak4Choawit Rakangthong5Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, ThailandDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, ThailandDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, ThailandDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, ThailandDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, ThailandCorresponding author.; Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, ThailandVarious aspects were compared of commercial and slow-growing broiler chickens in Thailand. In total, 416 one-day-old chicks of a commercial strain (COM) and a slow-growing strain (SG) were assigned equally to four experimental groups separated by strain and sex with 8 replications per group, using a 2 × 2 factorial in a completely randomized design. All birds were fed according to the recommended diets for each strain and sex, with the endpoint of the study at a final body weight of 2.5 kg/bird for each group. Growth performance parameters were assessed, and a separate digestibility study was conducted to evaluate nutrient intake, excretion, and retention, with a focus on assessing environmental impacts. The COM strain groups had a highly significant greater growth rate with lower feed intake and a better feed conversion ratio compared to SG strain groups, while the mortality rate did not differ between groups. The COM strain had a higher breast muscle yield, whereas SG produced significantly higher amounts of thighs and drumsticks. Furthermore, the feed ingredient ratios for energy (corn), protein (soybean meal), and phosphorus were lower in COM than for SG. The COM male broiler group had a significantly higher nitrogen digestion rate, with lower intake and excretion of nitrogen and phosphorus compared to SG. Economically, the COM strain groups had a lower feed cost than SG strain groups by approximately 16 % compared to SG, while the feed cost of COM was lower by 8 % in males and 23 % in females than for the equivalent SG groups. The interaction of strain and sex was highly significant in carbon emissions. The COM male group had lower carbon emissions compared to COM female, SG male, and SG female groups, which were 5.17 %, 11.73 %, and 31.25 %, respectively. In conclusion, raising commercial broiler chickens appeared to be more sustainable, effective and economic with a better environmental impact than raising slow-growing broiler chickens. This study did not evaluate welfare indicators, which should be addressed in future research.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579125001178Commercial broiler chickensSlow-growing broiler chickensGrowth performanceCarcass compositionEconomic and environmental impacts
spellingShingle Panatda Bungsrisawat
Surasek Tunseng
Savek Kiatsomphob
Sombat Prasongsook
Chaiyapoom Bunchasak
Choawit Rakangthong
Comparing commercial and slow-growing broilers in Thailand: growth, carcass quality, economics, and environmental perspective
Poultry Science
Commercial broiler chickens
Slow-growing broiler chickens
Growth performance
Carcass composition
Economic and environmental impacts
title Comparing commercial and slow-growing broilers in Thailand: growth, carcass quality, economics, and environmental perspective
title_full Comparing commercial and slow-growing broilers in Thailand: growth, carcass quality, economics, and environmental perspective
title_fullStr Comparing commercial and slow-growing broilers in Thailand: growth, carcass quality, economics, and environmental perspective
title_full_unstemmed Comparing commercial and slow-growing broilers in Thailand: growth, carcass quality, economics, and environmental perspective
title_short Comparing commercial and slow-growing broilers in Thailand: growth, carcass quality, economics, and environmental perspective
title_sort comparing commercial and slow growing broilers in thailand growth carcass quality economics and environmental perspective
topic Commercial broiler chickens
Slow-growing broiler chickens
Growth performance
Carcass composition
Economic and environmental impacts
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579125001178
work_keys_str_mv AT panatdabungsrisawat comparingcommercialandslowgrowingbroilersinthailandgrowthcarcassqualityeconomicsandenvironmentalperspective
AT surasektunseng comparingcommercialandslowgrowingbroilersinthailandgrowthcarcassqualityeconomicsandenvironmentalperspective
AT savekkiatsomphob comparingcommercialandslowgrowingbroilersinthailandgrowthcarcassqualityeconomicsandenvironmentalperspective
AT sombatprasongsook comparingcommercialandslowgrowingbroilersinthailandgrowthcarcassqualityeconomicsandenvironmentalperspective
AT chaiyapoombunchasak comparingcommercialandslowgrowingbroilersinthailandgrowthcarcassqualityeconomicsandenvironmentalperspective
AT choawitrakangthong comparingcommercialandslowgrowingbroilersinthailandgrowthcarcassqualityeconomicsandenvironmentalperspective