In Vitro Analysis of Compressive Strength of Three Different Aesthetic Restorative Materials
Aim: The study aims to assess and contrast the compressive strengths of three aesthetically pleasing restorative materials. Materials and Methods: Using metallic molds, 30 pellets were created, then split into 3 groups of 10, each meeting the required specifications. Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) cylin...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1884_24 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Aim:
The study aims to assess and contrast the compressive strengths of three aesthetically pleasing restorative materials.
Materials and Methods:
Using metallic molds, 30 pellets were created, then split into 3 groups of 10, each meeting the required specifications. Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) cylindrical specimens are in Group A; Resin Modified GIC (RMGIC) cylindrical specimens are in Group B; and Zirconomer cylindrical specimens are in Group C. A universal testing equipment was used to compress all of the samples, and the results were acquired. Tukey’s post hoc test and one-way ANOVA were used for statistical analysis.
Result:
Zirconomer’s compressive strength is significantly higher than that of RMGIC and GIC.
Conclusion:
The compressive strength of Zirconomer is the highest. As a result, Zirconomer may be the preferred material for aesthetic restorative procedures. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0976-4879 0975-7406 |