A randomized controlled trial on anonymizing reviewers to each other in peer review discussions.
Many peer-review processes involve reviewers submitting their independent reviews, followed by a discussion between the reviewers of each paper. A common question among policymakers is whether the reviewers of a paper should be anonymous to each other during the discussion. We shed light on this que...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Charvi Rastogi, Xiangchen Song, Zhijing Jin, Ivan Stelmakh, Hal Daumé, Kun Zhang, Nihar B Shah |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315674 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
A large scale randomized controlled trial on herding in peer-review discussions.
by: Ivan Stelmakh, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
How do authors' perceptions of their papers compare with co-authors' perceptions and peer-review decisions?
by: Charvi Rastogi, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Peer reviews of peer reviews: A randomized controlled trial and other experiments.
by: Alexander Goldberg, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Anonymity in anonymized peer review is incompatible with preprints
by: Jaime Teixeira da Silva
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Double Anonymity and the Peer Review Process
by: Richard J.C. Brown
Published: (2006-01-01)