A comparative analysis of sarcopenia screening methods in Thai people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in an outpatient setting
Abstract Background Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is closely linked with sarcopenia. The lack of validated, easy, and effective sarcopenia screening tools for people with T2DM may result in underdiagnosis, delayed interventions, and worsening outcomes. This study evaluated and compared the diagnos...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | BMC Geriatrics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06020-6 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849734093305020416 |
|---|---|
| author | Ornpicha Laohajaroensombat Thanapat Limpaarayakul Nattapol Sathavarodom Apussanee Boonyavarakul Parinya Samakkarnthai |
| author_facet | Ornpicha Laohajaroensombat Thanapat Limpaarayakul Nattapol Sathavarodom Apussanee Boonyavarakul Parinya Samakkarnthai |
| author_sort | Ornpicha Laohajaroensombat |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is closely linked with sarcopenia. The lack of validated, easy, and effective sarcopenia screening tools for people with T2DM may result in underdiagnosis, delayed interventions, and worsening outcomes. This study evaluated and compared the diagnostic accuracy of various sarcopenia screening tools in T2DM outpatients. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted on 329 people with T2DM at Phramongkutklao Hospital, Thailand, between December 2023 and November 2024. This study compared eight sarcopenia screening tools. The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 (AWGS 2019) criteria served as the reference standard. Sensitivity, Specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The optimal cutoffs were identified with the Youden index. Results The prevalence of sarcopenia was 23.7%. Calf circumference showed the highest diagnostic accuracy at standard cutoff (AUC: 0.892), with optimised cutoff points of < 37.0 cm for males and < 36.0 cm for females, and achieved high sensitivity (90.1% for males, 91.1% for females) with acceptable specificity (77.2% for males, 67.8% for females). Neck circumference demonstrated diagnostic utility (AUC: 0.741) with proposed thresholds of < 39.5 cm (males) and < 36.5 cm (females), yielding moderate sensitivity (69.7% for males, 82.2% for females) and acceptable specificity (78.9% for males, 62.6% for females). Questionnaire-based tools showed limited diagnostic accuracy with SARC-CalF performing the best (AUC: 0.789, sensitivity: 48.7%, specificity: 93.2%). Among physical performance tests, handgrip strength was the most accurate (AUC: 0.716), although these tests generally exhibited high sensitivity, but lower specificity. Conclusion Calf circumference was the most effective screening tool for sarcopenia in people with T2DM. Neck circumference emerged as a promising alternative at optimal cutoff values, offering a simple, novel and practice screening tool option. These findings support the implementation of anthropometric measures for sarcopenia screening in clinical settings, particularly in outpatient care. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d17a04bb4fa642f2b6f0bc875bc37975 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1471-2318 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Geriatrics |
| spelling | doaj-art-d17a04bb4fa642f2b6f0bc875bc379752025-08-20T03:07:54ZengBMCBMC Geriatrics1471-23182025-05-0125111210.1186/s12877-025-06020-6A comparative analysis of sarcopenia screening methods in Thai people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in an outpatient settingOrnpicha Laohajaroensombat0Thanapat Limpaarayakul1Nattapol Sathavarodom2Apussanee Boonyavarakul3Parinya Samakkarnthai4Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Phramongkutklao HospitalPhramongkutklao Hospital and College of MedicineDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Phramongkutklao HospitalPhramongkutklao Hospital and College of MedicineDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Phramongkutklao HospitalPhramongkutklao Hospital and College of MedicineDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Phramongkutklao HospitalPhramongkutklao Hospital and College of MedicineDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Phramongkutklao HospitalPhramongkutklao Hospital and College of MedicineAbstract Background Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is closely linked with sarcopenia. The lack of validated, easy, and effective sarcopenia screening tools for people with T2DM may result in underdiagnosis, delayed interventions, and worsening outcomes. This study evaluated and compared the diagnostic accuracy of various sarcopenia screening tools in T2DM outpatients. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted on 329 people with T2DM at Phramongkutklao Hospital, Thailand, between December 2023 and November 2024. This study compared eight sarcopenia screening tools. The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 (AWGS 2019) criteria served as the reference standard. Sensitivity, Specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The optimal cutoffs were identified with the Youden index. Results The prevalence of sarcopenia was 23.7%. Calf circumference showed the highest diagnostic accuracy at standard cutoff (AUC: 0.892), with optimised cutoff points of < 37.0 cm for males and < 36.0 cm for females, and achieved high sensitivity (90.1% for males, 91.1% for females) with acceptable specificity (77.2% for males, 67.8% for females). Neck circumference demonstrated diagnostic utility (AUC: 0.741) with proposed thresholds of < 39.5 cm (males) and < 36.5 cm (females), yielding moderate sensitivity (69.7% for males, 82.2% for females) and acceptable specificity (78.9% for males, 62.6% for females). Questionnaire-based tools showed limited diagnostic accuracy with SARC-CalF performing the best (AUC: 0.789, sensitivity: 48.7%, specificity: 93.2%). Among physical performance tests, handgrip strength was the most accurate (AUC: 0.716), although these tests generally exhibited high sensitivity, but lower specificity. Conclusion Calf circumference was the most effective screening tool for sarcopenia in people with T2DM. Neck circumference emerged as a promising alternative at optimal cutoff values, offering a simple, novel and practice screening tool option. These findings support the implementation of anthropometric measures for sarcopenia screening in clinical settings, particularly in outpatient care.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06020-6SarcopeniaType 2 Diabetes MellitusScreening ToolsSensitivitySpecificity |
| spellingShingle | Ornpicha Laohajaroensombat Thanapat Limpaarayakul Nattapol Sathavarodom Apussanee Boonyavarakul Parinya Samakkarnthai A comparative analysis of sarcopenia screening methods in Thai people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in an outpatient setting BMC Geriatrics Sarcopenia Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Screening Tools Sensitivity Specificity |
| title | A comparative analysis of sarcopenia screening methods in Thai people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in an outpatient setting |
| title_full | A comparative analysis of sarcopenia screening methods in Thai people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in an outpatient setting |
| title_fullStr | A comparative analysis of sarcopenia screening methods in Thai people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in an outpatient setting |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparative analysis of sarcopenia screening methods in Thai people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in an outpatient setting |
| title_short | A comparative analysis of sarcopenia screening methods in Thai people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in an outpatient setting |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of sarcopenia screening methods in thai people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in an outpatient setting |
| topic | Sarcopenia Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Screening Tools Sensitivity Specificity |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06020-6 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ornpichalaohajaroensombat acomparativeanalysisofsarcopeniascreeningmethodsinthaipeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusinanoutpatientsetting AT thanapatlimpaarayakul acomparativeanalysisofsarcopeniascreeningmethodsinthaipeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusinanoutpatientsetting AT nattapolsathavarodom acomparativeanalysisofsarcopeniascreeningmethodsinthaipeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusinanoutpatientsetting AT apussaneeboonyavarakul acomparativeanalysisofsarcopeniascreeningmethodsinthaipeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusinanoutpatientsetting AT parinyasamakkarnthai acomparativeanalysisofsarcopeniascreeningmethodsinthaipeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusinanoutpatientsetting AT ornpichalaohajaroensombat comparativeanalysisofsarcopeniascreeningmethodsinthaipeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusinanoutpatientsetting AT thanapatlimpaarayakul comparativeanalysisofsarcopeniascreeningmethodsinthaipeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusinanoutpatientsetting AT nattapolsathavarodom comparativeanalysisofsarcopeniascreeningmethodsinthaipeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusinanoutpatientsetting AT apussaneeboonyavarakul comparativeanalysisofsarcopeniascreeningmethodsinthaipeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusinanoutpatientsetting AT parinyasamakkarnthai comparativeanalysisofsarcopeniascreeningmethodsinthaipeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusinanoutpatientsetting |