Agroecological approaches to securing rural livelihoods: a critical analysis using the example of Tanzania

Agrifood systems globally are confronted with mounting challenges, including hunger, rising food prices, and geopolitical tensions. Conventional agricultural models face criticism for causing environmental degradation and increasing poverty, which emphasizes the need for sustainable alternatives. Ag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nadja Ahmad, Sören Köpke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1443002/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850106019006382080
author Nadja Ahmad
Sören Köpke
author_facet Nadja Ahmad
Sören Köpke
author_sort Nadja Ahmad
collection DOAJ
description Agrifood systems globally are confronted with mounting challenges, including hunger, rising food prices, and geopolitical tensions. Conventional agricultural models face criticism for causing environmental degradation and increasing poverty, which emphasizes the need for sustainable alternatives. Agroecology emerges as a promising solution that embodies a holistic, farmer-centric countermovement against corporate-led food systems. However, the practical implementation of agroecology as practice, science and social movement faces considerable barriers. Sceptics argue that agroecology is too complex, labor- and knowledge-intensive and cannot keep up with the production level of conventional agriculture. The case study was conducted in Tanzania’s Southern Highlands, based on expert interviews and literature analysis. It finds 18 factors that potentially impede the implementation and dissemination of agroecological approaches. Impeding factors exist in all three agroecological approaches. Most obstacles were identified with agroecology as a practical approach. Agroecology as a social movement was only addressed to a limited extent. Main challenges within the approaches include the fear of high financial, time, and energy expenditures when implementing agroecology, difficulties in adopting agroecological practices, the desired and equal collaboration between farmers and researchers, diverging and different definitions and understandings of agroecology, gender relations in farming activities and market and price dependencies for generating income. The study emphasizes the need for collaborative efforts, awareness, and supportive policies to promote agroecology effectively. The research contributes to bridging the gap between theoretical debates and practical applications of agroecology and urges rethinking and revising its conceptualization.
format Article
id doaj-art-d16dd4cc52054a6ea72082c64c4d0872
institution OA Journals
issn 2571-581X
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
spelling doaj-art-d16dd4cc52054a6ea72082c64c4d08722025-08-20T02:38:55ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems2571-581X2024-12-01810.3389/fsufs.2024.14430021443002Agroecological approaches to securing rural livelihoods: a critical analysis using the example of TanzaniaNadja Ahmad0Sören Köpke1Section of Political Ecology & Sustainability, Protestant Academy Hofgeismar, Hofgeismar, GermanySection of International Agricultural Policy and Environmental Governance, University of Kassel, Kassel, GermanyAgrifood systems globally are confronted with mounting challenges, including hunger, rising food prices, and geopolitical tensions. Conventional agricultural models face criticism for causing environmental degradation and increasing poverty, which emphasizes the need for sustainable alternatives. Agroecology emerges as a promising solution that embodies a holistic, farmer-centric countermovement against corporate-led food systems. However, the practical implementation of agroecology as practice, science and social movement faces considerable barriers. Sceptics argue that agroecology is too complex, labor- and knowledge-intensive and cannot keep up with the production level of conventional agriculture. The case study was conducted in Tanzania’s Southern Highlands, based on expert interviews and literature analysis. It finds 18 factors that potentially impede the implementation and dissemination of agroecological approaches. Impeding factors exist in all three agroecological approaches. Most obstacles were identified with agroecology as a practical approach. Agroecology as a social movement was only addressed to a limited extent. Main challenges within the approaches include the fear of high financial, time, and energy expenditures when implementing agroecology, difficulties in adopting agroecological practices, the desired and equal collaboration between farmers and researchers, diverging and different definitions and understandings of agroecology, gender relations in farming activities and market and price dependencies for generating income. The study emphasizes the need for collaborative efforts, awareness, and supportive policies to promote agroecology effectively. The research contributes to bridging the gap between theoretical debates and practical applications of agroecology and urges rethinking and revising its conceptualization.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1443002/fullTanzaniaagroecologyagrifood system transformationhindering factorsrural livelihoodsmall-scale farming
spellingShingle Nadja Ahmad
Sören Köpke
Agroecological approaches to securing rural livelihoods: a critical analysis using the example of Tanzania
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Tanzania
agroecology
agrifood system transformation
hindering factors
rural livelihood
small-scale farming
title Agroecological approaches to securing rural livelihoods: a critical analysis using the example of Tanzania
title_full Agroecological approaches to securing rural livelihoods: a critical analysis using the example of Tanzania
title_fullStr Agroecological approaches to securing rural livelihoods: a critical analysis using the example of Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Agroecological approaches to securing rural livelihoods: a critical analysis using the example of Tanzania
title_short Agroecological approaches to securing rural livelihoods: a critical analysis using the example of Tanzania
title_sort agroecological approaches to securing rural livelihoods a critical analysis using the example of tanzania
topic Tanzania
agroecology
agrifood system transformation
hindering factors
rural livelihood
small-scale farming
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1443002/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nadjaahmad agroecologicalapproachestosecuringrurallivelihoodsacriticalanalysisusingtheexampleoftanzania
AT sorenkopke agroecologicalapproachestosecuringrurallivelihoodsacriticalanalysisusingtheexampleoftanzania