An increased proportion of transgenic plants in the progeny of rapeseed (<i>Brassica napus</i> L.) transformants

Cotyledon and leaf explants of two spring rapeseed varieties were transformed with Agrobacterium tumefaciens harboring a genetic construct with the gfp marker gene. In order to reduce the proportion of hyperhydrated shoots, which appeared during regenerant formation, we optimized sucrose content in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. N. Raldugina, T. Z. Hoang, H. B. Ngoc, I. V. Karpichev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Vavilov Society of Geneticists and Breeders 2021-04-01
Series:Вавиловский журнал генетики и селекции
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vavilov.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2972
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832575120845045760
author G. N. Raldugina
T. Z. Hoang
H. B. Ngoc
I. V. Karpichev
author_facet G. N. Raldugina
T. Z. Hoang
H. B. Ngoc
I. V. Karpichev
author_sort G. N. Raldugina
collection DOAJ
description Cotyledon and leaf explants of two spring rapeseed varieties were transformed with Agrobacterium tumefaciens harboring a genetic construct with the gfp marker gene. In order to reduce the proportion of hyperhydrated shoots, which appeared during regenerant formation, we optimized sucrose content in the regeneration media. Analysis of the progeny obtained from T0 regenerants showed that in a number of lines the distribution of the gfp marker did not follow Mendelian segregation of a monogenic trait in self-pollinated plants, while in the progeny of the other lines of transgenic plants, the gfp marker was completely absent, although its presence had been confirmed in all selected T0 plants. We also found that in individual transformants gfp is randomly inherited throughout the central peduncle; its presence in the genome of seedlings does not depend on the location of the pod. Thus, both transformed and non-transformed cells were involved in the formation of gametes in T0 plants. In addition, marker segregation was different in plants of the T1 line obtained by nodal cuttings of a primary transformant, depending on the location of the cuttings on the stem of the original plant, indicating that the nature of T1 generation plants was also chimeric. Furthermore, we showed that propagation of plants by cutting followed by propagation by seeds formed as a result of self-pollination led to an increase in the proportion of transgenic plants in subsequent generations. The results obtained during the course of this study show that the transformants were chimeric, i. e. their tissues contained both transgenic and non-transgenic cells, and this chimeric nature was passed on to subsequent generations. We found that, in addition to nutrient media composition, other factors such as plant genotype and explant type also contribute to the rising of chimeric plants during transformation. Based on these results, we developed a simplified method, which consists of several rounds of a combination of cutting, seed production by self-pollination, and subsequent culling of wild-type plants, which significantly enriched descendent populations of the original rapeseed transformants with plants transgenic for the gfp marker.
format Article
id doaj-art-d15ef5cf538141a8ac14f3e3757bae06
institution Kabale University
issn 2500-3259
language English
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Vavilov Society of Geneticists and Breeders
record_format Article
series Вавиловский журнал генетики и селекции
spelling doaj-art-d15ef5cf538141a8ac14f3e3757bae062025-02-01T09:58:09ZengSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Vavilov Society of Geneticists and BreedersВавиловский журнал генетики и селекции2500-32592021-04-0125214715610.18699/VJ21.0181143An increased proportion of transgenic plants in the progeny of rapeseed (<i>Brassica napus</i> L.) transformantsG. N. Raldugina0T. Z. Hoang1H. B. Ngoc2I. V. Karpichev3Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology of the Russian Academy of SciencesTimiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; NKLPCB, Agricultural Genetics InstituteTimiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology of the Russian Academy of SciencesTimiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology of the Russian Academy of SciencesCotyledon and leaf explants of two spring rapeseed varieties were transformed with Agrobacterium tumefaciens harboring a genetic construct with the gfp marker gene. In order to reduce the proportion of hyperhydrated shoots, which appeared during regenerant formation, we optimized sucrose content in the regeneration media. Analysis of the progeny obtained from T0 regenerants showed that in a number of lines the distribution of the gfp marker did not follow Mendelian segregation of a monogenic trait in self-pollinated plants, while in the progeny of the other lines of transgenic plants, the gfp marker was completely absent, although its presence had been confirmed in all selected T0 plants. We also found that in individual transformants gfp is randomly inherited throughout the central peduncle; its presence in the genome of seedlings does not depend on the location of the pod. Thus, both transformed and non-transformed cells were involved in the formation of gametes in T0 plants. In addition, marker segregation was different in plants of the T1 line obtained by nodal cuttings of a primary transformant, depending on the location of the cuttings on the stem of the original plant, indicating that the nature of T1 generation plants was also chimeric. Furthermore, we showed that propagation of plants by cutting followed by propagation by seeds formed as a result of self-pollination led to an increase in the proportion of transgenic plants in subsequent generations. The results obtained during the course of this study show that the transformants were chimeric, i. e. their tissues contained both transgenic and non-transgenic cells, and this chimeric nature was passed on to subsequent generations. We found that, in addition to nutrient media composition, other factors such as plant genotype and explant type also contribute to the rising of chimeric plants during transformation. Based on these results, we developed a simplified method, which consists of several rounds of a combination of cutting, seed production by self-pollination, and subsequent culling of wild-type plants, which significantly enriched descendent populations of the original rapeseed transformants with plants transgenic for the gfp marker.https://vavilov.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2972transgene inheritancetransformationchimeravitrificationrapeseeds
spellingShingle G. N. Raldugina
T. Z. Hoang
H. B. Ngoc
I. V. Karpichev
An increased proportion of transgenic plants in the progeny of rapeseed (<i>Brassica napus</i> L.) transformants
Вавиловский журнал генетики и селекции
transgene inheritance
transformation
chimera
vitrification
rapeseeds
title An increased proportion of transgenic plants in the progeny of rapeseed (<i>Brassica napus</i> L.) transformants
title_full An increased proportion of transgenic plants in the progeny of rapeseed (<i>Brassica napus</i> L.) transformants
title_fullStr An increased proportion of transgenic plants in the progeny of rapeseed (<i>Brassica napus</i> L.) transformants
title_full_unstemmed An increased proportion of transgenic plants in the progeny of rapeseed (<i>Brassica napus</i> L.) transformants
title_short An increased proportion of transgenic plants in the progeny of rapeseed (<i>Brassica napus</i> L.) transformants
title_sort increased proportion of transgenic plants in the progeny of rapeseed i brassica napus i l transformants
topic transgene inheritance
transformation
chimera
vitrification
rapeseeds
url https://vavilov.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2972
work_keys_str_mv AT gnraldugina anincreasedproportionoftransgenicplantsintheprogenyofrapeseedibrassicanapusiltransformants
AT tzhoang anincreasedproportionoftransgenicplantsintheprogenyofrapeseedibrassicanapusiltransformants
AT hbngoc anincreasedproportionoftransgenicplantsintheprogenyofrapeseedibrassicanapusiltransformants
AT ivkarpichev anincreasedproportionoftransgenicplantsintheprogenyofrapeseedibrassicanapusiltransformants
AT gnraldugina increasedproportionoftransgenicplantsintheprogenyofrapeseedibrassicanapusiltransformants
AT tzhoang increasedproportionoftransgenicplantsintheprogenyofrapeseedibrassicanapusiltransformants
AT hbngoc increasedproportionoftransgenicplantsintheprogenyofrapeseedibrassicanapusiltransformants
AT ivkarpichev increasedproportionoftransgenicplantsintheprogenyofrapeseedibrassicanapusiltransformants