Maternal mortality estimation methodologies: a scoping review and evaluation of suitability for use in humanitarian settings

Abstract Background Around the world, a maternal death occurs approximately every two minutes—most of these deaths are preventable. The maternal mortality ratio is a key indicator for the Sustainable Development Goals, yet we have no reliable way to estimate maternal deaths in refugee or internally...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Blake Erhardt-Ohren, Sandra I. McCoy, Dennis M. Feehan, Rohini J. Haar, Ndola Prata
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-12-01
Series:Conflict and Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-024-00636-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850102237039165440
author Blake Erhardt-Ohren
Sandra I. McCoy
Dennis M. Feehan
Rohini J. Haar
Ndola Prata
author_facet Blake Erhardt-Ohren
Sandra I. McCoy
Dennis M. Feehan
Rohini J. Haar
Ndola Prata
author_sort Blake Erhardt-Ohren
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Around the world, a maternal death occurs approximately every two minutes—most of these deaths are preventable. The maternal mortality ratio is a key indicator for the Sustainable Development Goals, yet we have no reliable way to estimate maternal deaths in refugee or internally displaced persons (IDP) camps and settlements. The goal of this study was to understand the methodologies most suited for adaptation for use to estimate the proportion of maternal mortality due to abortion complications in these settings. Methods We conducted a scoping review of methodologies to estimate maternal mortality and evaluated them using a predetermined set of criteria. We evaluated nine original methodologies using eleven categories related to implementation in refugee or IDP camps and settlements: data sources, definitions, sample size, timing of point estimate relative to data collection, bias, human resources, time needed for implementation, data collection training, statistical training, digitalization, and cost. Each category could be assigned zero to four points, for a total score of 44 points. After evaluating each original methodology, we reviewed the original publication's citations or searched for other implementations through October 2022. We revised the original scores and developed a rank-order list of the methodologies according to their suitability for implementation in refugee and IDP camps. Results We identified 124 publications that estimated maternal mortality. The Maternal Deaths from Informants/Maternal Death Follow on Review (MADE-IN/MADE-FOR) (33.5), hospital- or facility-based (33.5), and community informant-based (32.5) methodologies ranked highest due to low costs, short time interval needed for implementation, small sample sizes and close timing of point estimate relative to data collection, easy digitalization, and the need for no statistical training. Discussion Similar to the lack of a “perfect” methodology to estimate maternal mortality in stable settings, there are compromises to consider when applying these methodologies to humanitarian settings. The most promising methodologies are adaptable to practical constraints in refugee and IDP camps and settlements. New methodologies that adapt and strengthen the MADE-IN/MADE-FOR, hospital- or facility-based, and community informant-based methodology show promise and must be further developed.
format Article
id doaj-art-d1544a8045154e33ac635d1a0e7a54f8
institution DOAJ
issn 1752-1505
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Conflict and Health
spelling doaj-art-d1544a8045154e33ac635d1a0e7a54f82025-08-20T02:39:48ZengBMCConflict and Health1752-15052024-12-0118111610.1186/s13031-024-00636-yMaternal mortality estimation methodologies: a scoping review and evaluation of suitability for use in humanitarian settingsBlake Erhardt-Ohren0Sandra I. McCoy1Dennis M. Feehan2Rohini J. Haar3Ndola Prata4Bixby Center for Population, Health and Sustainability, School of Public Health, University of California, BerkeleyDivision of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, BerkeleyDepartment of Demography, University of California, BerkeleyDivision of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, BerkeleyBixby Center for Population, Health and Sustainability, School of Public Health, University of California, BerkeleyAbstract Background Around the world, a maternal death occurs approximately every two minutes—most of these deaths are preventable. The maternal mortality ratio is a key indicator for the Sustainable Development Goals, yet we have no reliable way to estimate maternal deaths in refugee or internally displaced persons (IDP) camps and settlements. The goal of this study was to understand the methodologies most suited for adaptation for use to estimate the proportion of maternal mortality due to abortion complications in these settings. Methods We conducted a scoping review of methodologies to estimate maternal mortality and evaluated them using a predetermined set of criteria. We evaluated nine original methodologies using eleven categories related to implementation in refugee or IDP camps and settlements: data sources, definitions, sample size, timing of point estimate relative to data collection, bias, human resources, time needed for implementation, data collection training, statistical training, digitalization, and cost. Each category could be assigned zero to four points, for a total score of 44 points. After evaluating each original methodology, we reviewed the original publication's citations or searched for other implementations through October 2022. We revised the original scores and developed a rank-order list of the methodologies according to their suitability for implementation in refugee and IDP camps. Results We identified 124 publications that estimated maternal mortality. The Maternal Deaths from Informants/Maternal Death Follow on Review (MADE-IN/MADE-FOR) (33.5), hospital- or facility-based (33.5), and community informant-based (32.5) methodologies ranked highest due to low costs, short time interval needed for implementation, small sample sizes and close timing of point estimate relative to data collection, easy digitalization, and the need for no statistical training. Discussion Similar to the lack of a “perfect” methodology to estimate maternal mortality in stable settings, there are compromises to consider when applying these methodologies to humanitarian settings. The most promising methodologies are adaptable to practical constraints in refugee and IDP camps and settlements. New methodologies that adapt and strengthen the MADE-IN/MADE-FOR, hospital- or facility-based, and community informant-based methodology show promise and must be further developed.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-024-00636-yMaternal mortalityAbortionTermination of pregnancyRefugeeForcibly displacedMeasurement
spellingShingle Blake Erhardt-Ohren
Sandra I. McCoy
Dennis M. Feehan
Rohini J. Haar
Ndola Prata
Maternal mortality estimation methodologies: a scoping review and evaluation of suitability for use in humanitarian settings
Conflict and Health
Maternal mortality
Abortion
Termination of pregnancy
Refugee
Forcibly displaced
Measurement
title Maternal mortality estimation methodologies: a scoping review and evaluation of suitability for use in humanitarian settings
title_full Maternal mortality estimation methodologies: a scoping review and evaluation of suitability for use in humanitarian settings
title_fullStr Maternal mortality estimation methodologies: a scoping review and evaluation of suitability for use in humanitarian settings
title_full_unstemmed Maternal mortality estimation methodologies: a scoping review and evaluation of suitability for use in humanitarian settings
title_short Maternal mortality estimation methodologies: a scoping review and evaluation of suitability for use in humanitarian settings
title_sort maternal mortality estimation methodologies a scoping review and evaluation of suitability for use in humanitarian settings
topic Maternal mortality
Abortion
Termination of pregnancy
Refugee
Forcibly displaced
Measurement
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-024-00636-y
work_keys_str_mv AT blakeerhardtohren maternalmortalityestimationmethodologiesascopingreviewandevaluationofsuitabilityforuseinhumanitariansettings
AT sandraimccoy maternalmortalityestimationmethodologiesascopingreviewandevaluationofsuitabilityforuseinhumanitariansettings
AT dennismfeehan maternalmortalityestimationmethodologiesascopingreviewandevaluationofsuitabilityforuseinhumanitariansettings
AT rohinijhaar maternalmortalityestimationmethodologiesascopingreviewandevaluationofsuitabilityforuseinhumanitariansettings
AT ndolaprata maternalmortalityestimationmethodologiesascopingreviewandevaluationofsuitabilityforuseinhumanitariansettings