K prehistorii českých kolektivních domů
Collective homes and housing collectivization are phenomena that are usually considered to be ideologically close to Marxism and anarchism. In the 19th century, however, socialization of domestic work was part of various ideological streams, from social democrats to the business establishment. At th...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | ces |
| Published: |
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Sociology
2012-08-01
|
| Series: | Gender a Výzkum |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.genderonline.cz/uploads/889409e822bf7933112676276c68d01fd1919a5a_guzik-k-prehistorii-kolektivnich-domu.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849245297941676032 |
|---|---|
| author | Hubert Guzik |
| author_facet | Hubert Guzik |
| author_sort | Hubert Guzik |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Collective homes and housing collectivization are phenomena that are usually considered to be ideologically close to Marxism and anarchism. In the 19th century, however, socialization of domestic work was part of various ideological streams, from social democrats to the business establishment. At the beginning of the 20th century, various forms of collective housing garnered the attention of the Czech intellectual elite. Information about collective housing came either directly from the United States of America or from Germany and Scandinavia. Czech sociologists regarded it as a contribution to social solidarity; feminists, on the contrary, as an instrument for the reinforcement of the family. The concept of homes with central kitchens came to Bohemia not only as part of a political and economic discourse but also in utopian novels and as part of architectural debates. Czech architecture and literature were, however, reserved about collective housing. The first larger reflection on central kitchens did not appear in Czech architecture until the beginning of the 1920s, on the margins of debates about the garden city. Among feminists, in contrast, we can see an uninterrupted interest in the socialization of domestic work during the entire first four decades of the 20th century. And it was feminists who managed to give the theoretical deliberations a real, albeit very constrained architectural form. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d149fbec86ee412d88c49e84fcc4a8d8 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2570-6578 2570-6586 |
| language | ces |
| publishDate | 2012-08-01 |
| publisher | Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Sociology |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Gender a Výzkum |
| spelling | doaj-art-d149fbec86ee412d88c49e84fcc4a8d82025-08-20T03:58:50ZcesCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of SociologyGender a Výzkum2570-65782570-65862012-08-0113142K prehistorii českých kolektivních domůHubert GuzikCollective homes and housing collectivization are phenomena that are usually considered to be ideologically close to Marxism and anarchism. In the 19th century, however, socialization of domestic work was part of various ideological streams, from social democrats to the business establishment. At the beginning of the 20th century, various forms of collective housing garnered the attention of the Czech intellectual elite. Information about collective housing came either directly from the United States of America or from Germany and Scandinavia. Czech sociologists regarded it as a contribution to social solidarity; feminists, on the contrary, as an instrument for the reinforcement of the family. The concept of homes with central kitchens came to Bohemia not only as part of a political and economic discourse but also in utopian novels and as part of architectural debates. Czech architecture and literature were, however, reserved about collective housing. The first larger reflection on central kitchens did not appear in Czech architecture until the beginning of the 1920s, on the margins of debates about the garden city. Among feminists, in contrast, we can see an uninterrupted interest in the socialization of domestic work during the entire first four decades of the 20th century. And it was feminists who managed to give the theoretical deliberations a real, albeit very constrained architectural form.https://www.genderonline.cz/uploads/889409e822bf7933112676276c68d01fd1919a5a_guzik-k-prehistorii-kolektivnich-domu.pdfcollective homehousinggarden city |
| spellingShingle | Hubert Guzik K prehistorii českých kolektivních domů Gender a Výzkum collective home housing garden city |
| title | K prehistorii českých kolektivních domů |
| title_full | K prehistorii českých kolektivních domů |
| title_fullStr | K prehistorii českých kolektivních domů |
| title_full_unstemmed | K prehistorii českých kolektivních domů |
| title_short | K prehistorii českých kolektivních domů |
| title_sort | k prehistorii ceskych kolektivnich domu |
| topic | collective home housing garden city |
| url | https://www.genderonline.cz/uploads/889409e822bf7933112676276c68d01fd1919a5a_guzik-k-prehistorii-kolektivnich-domu.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hubertguzik kprehistoriiceskychkolektivnichdomu |