Contested narratives: a qualitative analysis of abortion testimonies in Louisiana legislature

IntroductionFollowing the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, Louisiana enacted a “trigger law” banning nearly all abortions. Attempts to reform existing restrictive legislation so as to allow for abortions under exceptions have been unsuccessful...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martha Silva, Jeni Stolow, Micki Burdick, Amy Mercieca
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Global Women's Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1533813/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849725084313321472
author Martha Silva
Jeni Stolow
Micki Burdick
Amy Mercieca
author_facet Martha Silva
Jeni Stolow
Micki Burdick
Amy Mercieca
author_sort Martha Silva
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionFollowing the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, Louisiana enacted a “trigger law” banning nearly all abortions. Attempts to reform existing restrictive legislation so as to allow for abortions under exceptions have been unsuccessful to date. This study aims to describe how abortion discourse is framed in public testimony around House Bill 346 in the 2023 Louisiana legislative session, which attempted to pass an abortion exception for pregnancy in the case of rape or incest.MethodsWe conducted a conventional qualitative content analysis utilizing a rhetorical lens, using testimony transcripts from the May 10, 2023, Louisiana Administration of Criminal Justice Committee hearing. An iterative coding approach allowed us to categorize salient themes, language patterns, speaker characteristics, emotional tones, and rhetorical strategies. Demographic characteristics were ascribed to speakers based on perceived gender and race when not self-identified.ResultsTestimony analysis revealed four primary themes: (1) conflicting representations of abortion, (2) religion's role in shaping discourse, (3) humanization of fetuses vs. pregnant individuals, and (4) debate over available resources for survivors and children. Abortion is represented as being traumatic, adding to the trauma caused by sexual violence, while representing childbearing as healing from trauma. Being conceived as a result of sexual violence is used as an identity marker worthy of protection. Religious rhetoric permeates testimony both in support and in opposition to abortion exceptions, making a “pro-life” stance the starting point for debate. Lastly, we find evidence of dehumanization of survivors' and others' experience.ConclusionsThe testimonies around HB346 expose deeply polarized discourse that reflects moral, religious, and ethical conflicts, as well as mismatched conversations that are unlikely to persuade opposing sides. Addressing these dissonant narratives requires nuanced advocacy strategies and resources to support effective testimony.
format Article
id doaj-art-d1199f6a33144f8fa7d81702e7c5ae35
institution DOAJ
issn 2673-5059
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Global Women's Health
spelling doaj-art-d1199f6a33144f8fa7d81702e7c5ae352025-08-20T03:10:34ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Global Women's Health2673-50592025-04-01610.3389/fgwh.2025.15338131533813Contested narratives: a qualitative analysis of abortion testimonies in Louisiana legislatureMartha Silva0Jeni Stolow1Micki Burdick2Amy Mercieca3Department of International Health and Sustainable Development, Celia Scott Weatherhead School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, United StatesDepartment of Social, Behavioral and Population Sciences, Celia Scott Weatherhead School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, United StatesDepartment of Women and Gender Studies, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United StatesDepartment of Social, Behavioral and Population Sciences, Celia Scott Weatherhead School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, United StatesIntroductionFollowing the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, Louisiana enacted a “trigger law” banning nearly all abortions. Attempts to reform existing restrictive legislation so as to allow for abortions under exceptions have been unsuccessful to date. This study aims to describe how abortion discourse is framed in public testimony around House Bill 346 in the 2023 Louisiana legislative session, which attempted to pass an abortion exception for pregnancy in the case of rape or incest.MethodsWe conducted a conventional qualitative content analysis utilizing a rhetorical lens, using testimony transcripts from the May 10, 2023, Louisiana Administration of Criminal Justice Committee hearing. An iterative coding approach allowed us to categorize salient themes, language patterns, speaker characteristics, emotional tones, and rhetorical strategies. Demographic characteristics were ascribed to speakers based on perceived gender and race when not self-identified.ResultsTestimony analysis revealed four primary themes: (1) conflicting representations of abortion, (2) religion's role in shaping discourse, (3) humanization of fetuses vs. pregnant individuals, and (4) debate over available resources for survivors and children. Abortion is represented as being traumatic, adding to the trauma caused by sexual violence, while representing childbearing as healing from trauma. Being conceived as a result of sexual violence is used as an identity marker worthy of protection. Religious rhetoric permeates testimony both in support and in opposition to abortion exceptions, making a “pro-life” stance the starting point for debate. Lastly, we find evidence of dehumanization of survivors' and others' experience.ConclusionsThe testimonies around HB346 expose deeply polarized discourse that reflects moral, religious, and ethical conflicts, as well as mismatched conversations that are unlikely to persuade opposing sides. Addressing these dissonant narratives requires nuanced advocacy strategies and resources to support effective testimony.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1533813/fullabortiondiscoursesexual violencelegislationreproductive health
spellingShingle Martha Silva
Jeni Stolow
Micki Burdick
Amy Mercieca
Contested narratives: a qualitative analysis of abortion testimonies in Louisiana legislature
Frontiers in Global Women's Health
abortion
discourse
sexual violence
legislation
reproductive health
title Contested narratives: a qualitative analysis of abortion testimonies in Louisiana legislature
title_full Contested narratives: a qualitative analysis of abortion testimonies in Louisiana legislature
title_fullStr Contested narratives: a qualitative analysis of abortion testimonies in Louisiana legislature
title_full_unstemmed Contested narratives: a qualitative analysis of abortion testimonies in Louisiana legislature
title_short Contested narratives: a qualitative analysis of abortion testimonies in Louisiana legislature
title_sort contested narratives a qualitative analysis of abortion testimonies in louisiana legislature
topic abortion
discourse
sexual violence
legislation
reproductive health
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1533813/full
work_keys_str_mv AT marthasilva contestednarrativesaqualitativeanalysisofabortiontestimoniesinlouisianalegislature
AT jenistolow contestednarrativesaqualitativeanalysisofabortiontestimoniesinlouisianalegislature
AT mickiburdick contestednarrativesaqualitativeanalysisofabortiontestimoniesinlouisianalegislature
AT amymercieca contestednarrativesaqualitativeanalysisofabortiontestimoniesinlouisianalegislature