Realistic Outcomes of Moon–Moon Collisions in Lunar Formation Theory

The multiple impact hypothesis proposes that the Moon formed through a series of smaller collisions, rather than a single giant impact. This study advances our understanding of this hypothesis, as well as moon collisions in other contexts, by exploring the implications of these smaller impacts, empl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Uri Malamud, Hagai B. Perets
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2024-01-01
Series:The Astrophysical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8d52
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850061010839273472
author Uri Malamud
Hagai B. Perets
author_facet Uri Malamud
Hagai B. Perets
author_sort Uri Malamud
collection DOAJ
description The multiple impact hypothesis proposes that the Moon formed through a series of smaller collisions, rather than a single giant impact. This study advances our understanding of this hypothesis, as well as moon collisions in other contexts, by exploring the implications of these smaller impacts, employing a novel methodological approach that combines self-consistent initial conditions, hybrid hydrodynamic/ N -body simulations, and the incorporation of material strength. Our findings challenge the conventional assumption of perfect mergers in previous models, revealing a spectrum of collision outcomes including partial accretion and mass loss. These outcomes are sensitive to collision parameters and the Earth’s tidal influence, underscoring the complex dynamics of lunar accretion. Importantly, we demonstrate that incorporating material strength is important for accurately simulating moonlet-sized impacts. This inclusion significantly affects fragmentation, tidal disruption, and the amount of material ejected or accreted onto the Earth, ultimately impacting the Moon’s growth trajectory. By accurately modeling diverse collision outcomes, our hybrid approach provides a powerful new framework for understanding the Moon’s formation. We show that most collisions (≈90%) do not significantly erode the largest moonlet, supporting the feasibility of lunar growth through accretion. Moreover, we revise previous estimates of satellite disruption, suggesting a higher survival rate and further bolstering the multiple-impact scenario.
format Article
id doaj-art-d10262f3c76a4a00958fb2cabfdcbf24
institution DOAJ
issn 1538-4357
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astrophysical Journal
spelling doaj-art-d10262f3c76a4a00958fb2cabfdcbf242025-08-20T02:50:23ZengIOP PublishingThe Astrophysical Journal1538-43572024-01-01977219310.3847/1538-4357/ad8d52Realistic Outcomes of Moon–Moon Collisions in Lunar Formation TheoryUri Malamud0Hagai B. Perets1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5004-199XDepartment of Physics, Technion Israel Institute of Technology , Israel ; urimala@physics.technion.ac.ilDepartment of Physics, Technion Israel Institute of Technology , Israel ; urimala@physics.technion.ac.il; Department of Natural Sciences, The Open University of Israel , 1 University Road, P.O. Box 808, Raanana 4353701, IsraelThe multiple impact hypothesis proposes that the Moon formed through a series of smaller collisions, rather than a single giant impact. This study advances our understanding of this hypothesis, as well as moon collisions in other contexts, by exploring the implications of these smaller impacts, employing a novel methodological approach that combines self-consistent initial conditions, hybrid hydrodynamic/ N -body simulations, and the incorporation of material strength. Our findings challenge the conventional assumption of perfect mergers in previous models, revealing a spectrum of collision outcomes including partial accretion and mass loss. These outcomes are sensitive to collision parameters and the Earth’s tidal influence, underscoring the complex dynamics of lunar accretion. Importantly, we demonstrate that incorporating material strength is important for accurately simulating moonlet-sized impacts. This inclusion significantly affects fragmentation, tidal disruption, and the amount of material ejected or accreted onto the Earth, ultimately impacting the Moon’s growth trajectory. By accurately modeling diverse collision outcomes, our hybrid approach provides a powerful new framework for understanding the Moon’s formation. We show that most collisions (≈90%) do not significantly erode the largest moonlet, supporting the feasibility of lunar growth through accretion. Moreover, we revise previous estimates of satellite disruption, suggesting a higher survival rate and further bolstering the multiple-impact scenario.https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8d52The MoonEarth-moon systemSolar system astronomyPlanet formationHydrodynamical simulationsN-body simulations
spellingShingle Uri Malamud
Hagai B. Perets
Realistic Outcomes of Moon–Moon Collisions in Lunar Formation Theory
The Astrophysical Journal
The Moon
Earth-moon system
Solar system astronomy
Planet formation
Hydrodynamical simulations
N-body simulations
title Realistic Outcomes of Moon–Moon Collisions in Lunar Formation Theory
title_full Realistic Outcomes of Moon–Moon Collisions in Lunar Formation Theory
title_fullStr Realistic Outcomes of Moon–Moon Collisions in Lunar Formation Theory
title_full_unstemmed Realistic Outcomes of Moon–Moon Collisions in Lunar Formation Theory
title_short Realistic Outcomes of Moon–Moon Collisions in Lunar Formation Theory
title_sort realistic outcomes of moon moon collisions in lunar formation theory
topic The Moon
Earth-moon system
Solar system astronomy
Planet formation
Hydrodynamical simulations
N-body simulations
url https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8d52
work_keys_str_mv AT urimalamud realisticoutcomesofmoonmooncollisionsinlunarformationtheory
AT hagaibperets realisticoutcomesofmoonmooncollisionsinlunarformationtheory