The Prevalence of Polypharmacy and the Contribution of Age, Period, and Cohort Effects in Sweden From 2006 to 2020

ABSTRACT Objective To investigate the age, period, and cohort effects of polypharmacy in older adults using Swedish register data covering the period 2006 to 2020. Design Repeated cross‐sectional study using routinely‐collected health care data. Setting Nationwide, Sweden. Participants A 10% random...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Theodore T. Miao, Malin Ericsson, Jonas W. Wastesson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-05-01
Series:Health Science Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70778
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849391657889300480
author Theodore T. Miao
Malin Ericsson
Jonas W. Wastesson
author_facet Theodore T. Miao
Malin Ericsson
Jonas W. Wastesson
author_sort Theodore T. Miao
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Objective To investigate the age, period, and cohort effects of polypharmacy in older adults using Swedish register data covering the period 2006 to 2020. Design Repeated cross‐sectional study using routinely‐collected health care data. Setting Nationwide, Sweden. Participants A 10% random sample was drawn each year from the source population of all adults aged ≥ 65 in Sweden, 2006–2020 (cumulative n > 3,000,000). Measurement Polypharmacy was defined as the use of ≥ 5 medicines. Drug data were extracted from the National Prescribed Drug Register (NPDR) Medication use was assessed on 1st January (1‐day point prevalence) each year based on the drug duration episodes. Age‐Period‐Cohort analysis was conducted to explore these effects. Results Overall, 32.8% of older adults was exposed to polypharmacy in 2020 compared to 28.6% in 2006. This increase was more pronounced among individuals aged 85 to 89, from while the prevalence remained relatively steady among those aged 65 to 84. In the formal Age‐Period‐Cohort analysis, the cohort differences were weak for polypharmacy, but more prevalent for specific medication classes. Conclusion Polypharmacy is mainly influenced by age and period effects, but not by cohort. The rise in polypharmacy is primarily propelled by an increased pace in medication use among individuals aged 75 to 89 years. These findings can provide valuable insights for making effective strategies aimed at reducing polypharmacy.
format Article
id doaj-art-d0ba62c12e2545c3b2e92a8394c8e498
institution Kabale University
issn 2398-8835
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Health Science Reports
spelling doaj-art-d0ba62c12e2545c3b2e92a8394c8e4982025-08-20T03:41:00ZengWileyHealth Science Reports2398-88352025-05-0185n/an/a10.1002/hsr2.70778The Prevalence of Polypharmacy and the Contribution of Age, Period, and Cohort Effects in Sweden From 2006 to 2020Theodore T. Miao0Malin Ericsson1Jonas W. Wastesson2Aging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm University Stockholm SwedenAging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm University Stockholm SwedenAging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm University Stockholm SwedenABSTRACT Objective To investigate the age, period, and cohort effects of polypharmacy in older adults using Swedish register data covering the period 2006 to 2020. Design Repeated cross‐sectional study using routinely‐collected health care data. Setting Nationwide, Sweden. Participants A 10% random sample was drawn each year from the source population of all adults aged ≥ 65 in Sweden, 2006–2020 (cumulative n > 3,000,000). Measurement Polypharmacy was defined as the use of ≥ 5 medicines. Drug data were extracted from the National Prescribed Drug Register (NPDR) Medication use was assessed on 1st January (1‐day point prevalence) each year based on the drug duration episodes. Age‐Period‐Cohort analysis was conducted to explore these effects. Results Overall, 32.8% of older adults was exposed to polypharmacy in 2020 compared to 28.6% in 2006. This increase was more pronounced among individuals aged 85 to 89, from while the prevalence remained relatively steady among those aged 65 to 84. In the formal Age‐Period‐Cohort analysis, the cohort differences were weak for polypharmacy, but more prevalent for specific medication classes. Conclusion Polypharmacy is mainly influenced by age and period effects, but not by cohort. The rise in polypharmacy is primarily propelled by an increased pace in medication use among individuals aged 75 to 89 years. These findings can provide valuable insights for making effective strategies aimed at reducing polypharmacy.https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70778cohort analysisdrugepidemiologymedicationpolypharmacy
spellingShingle Theodore T. Miao
Malin Ericsson
Jonas W. Wastesson
The Prevalence of Polypharmacy and the Contribution of Age, Period, and Cohort Effects in Sweden From 2006 to 2020
Health Science Reports
cohort analysis
drug
epidemiology
medication
polypharmacy
title The Prevalence of Polypharmacy and the Contribution of Age, Period, and Cohort Effects in Sweden From 2006 to 2020
title_full The Prevalence of Polypharmacy and the Contribution of Age, Period, and Cohort Effects in Sweden From 2006 to 2020
title_fullStr The Prevalence of Polypharmacy and the Contribution of Age, Period, and Cohort Effects in Sweden From 2006 to 2020
title_full_unstemmed The Prevalence of Polypharmacy and the Contribution of Age, Period, and Cohort Effects in Sweden From 2006 to 2020
title_short The Prevalence of Polypharmacy and the Contribution of Age, Period, and Cohort Effects in Sweden From 2006 to 2020
title_sort prevalence of polypharmacy and the contribution of age period and cohort effects in sweden from 2006 to 2020
topic cohort analysis
drug
epidemiology
medication
polypharmacy
url https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70778
work_keys_str_mv AT theodoretmiao theprevalenceofpolypharmacyandthecontributionofageperiodandcohorteffectsinswedenfrom2006to2020
AT malinericsson theprevalenceofpolypharmacyandthecontributionofageperiodandcohorteffectsinswedenfrom2006to2020
AT jonaswwastesson theprevalenceofpolypharmacyandthecontributionofageperiodandcohorteffectsinswedenfrom2006to2020
AT theodoretmiao prevalenceofpolypharmacyandthecontributionofageperiodandcohorteffectsinswedenfrom2006to2020
AT malinericsson prevalenceofpolypharmacyandthecontributionofageperiodandcohorteffectsinswedenfrom2006to2020
AT jonaswwastesson prevalenceofpolypharmacyandthecontributionofageperiodandcohorteffectsinswedenfrom2006to2020