Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Patients with Cancer: Complications and Retrieval Success Rate

Active cancer (ACa) is strongly associated with venous thromboembolism and bleeding. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters (RIVCF) are frequently placed in these patients when anticoagulation cannot be continued. Objectives. To describe the complications and retrieval rate of inferior vena cava fil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana I. Casanegra, Lisa M. Landrum, Alfonso J. Tafur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:International Journal of Vascular Medicine
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6413541
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849695998439325696
author Ana I. Casanegra
Lisa M. Landrum
Alfonso J. Tafur
author_facet Ana I. Casanegra
Lisa M. Landrum
Alfonso J. Tafur
author_sort Ana I. Casanegra
collection DOAJ
description Active cancer (ACa) is strongly associated with venous thromboembolism and bleeding. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters (RIVCF) are frequently placed in these patients when anticoagulation cannot be continued. Objectives. To describe the complications and retrieval rate of inferior vena cava filters in patients with ACa. Methods. Retrospective review of 251 consecutive patients with RIVCF in a single institution. Results. We included 251 patients with RIVCF with a mean age of 58.1 years and a median follow-up of 5.4 months (164 days, IQR: 34–385). Of these patients 32% had ACa. There were no differences in recurrence rate of DVT between patients with ACa and those without ACa (13% versus 17%, p = ns). Also, there were no differences in major filter complications (11% ACa versus 7% no ACa, p = ns). The filter retrieval was not different between groups (log-rank = 0.16). Retrieval rate at 6 months was 49% in ACa patients versus 64% in patients without ACa (p = ns). Filter retrieval was less frequent in ACa patients with metastatic disease (p < 0.01) or a nonsurgical indication for filter placement (p = 0.04). Conclusions. No differences were noted in retrieval rate, recurrent DVT, or filter complications between the two groups. ACa should not preclude the use of RIVCF.
format Article
id doaj-art-d0a3959106884fe9bd6dec7ff0c7e05a
institution DOAJ
issn 2090-2824
2090-2832
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Vascular Medicine
spelling doaj-art-d0a3959106884fe9bd6dec7ff0c7e05a2025-08-20T03:19:35ZengWileyInternational Journal of Vascular Medicine2090-28242090-28322016-01-01201610.1155/2016/64135416413541Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Patients with Cancer: Complications and Retrieval Success RateAna I. Casanegra0Lisa M. Landrum1Alfonso J. Tafur2Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Section, Vascular Medicine Program, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 920 Stanton L. Young Boulevard, WP 3010, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USADepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Section of Gynecology Oncology, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 800 NE 10th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USADepartment of Medicine, Vascular Surgery and Medicine Section, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 2650 Ridge Avenue, Evanston, IL 60201, USAActive cancer (ACa) is strongly associated with venous thromboembolism and bleeding. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters (RIVCF) are frequently placed in these patients when anticoagulation cannot be continued. Objectives. To describe the complications and retrieval rate of inferior vena cava filters in patients with ACa. Methods. Retrospective review of 251 consecutive patients with RIVCF in a single institution. Results. We included 251 patients with RIVCF with a mean age of 58.1 years and a median follow-up of 5.4 months (164 days, IQR: 34–385). Of these patients 32% had ACa. There were no differences in recurrence rate of DVT between patients with ACa and those without ACa (13% versus 17%, p = ns). Also, there were no differences in major filter complications (11% ACa versus 7% no ACa, p = ns). The filter retrieval was not different between groups (log-rank = 0.16). Retrieval rate at 6 months was 49% in ACa patients versus 64% in patients without ACa (p = ns). Filter retrieval was less frequent in ACa patients with metastatic disease (p < 0.01) or a nonsurgical indication for filter placement (p = 0.04). Conclusions. No differences were noted in retrieval rate, recurrent DVT, or filter complications between the two groups. ACa should not preclude the use of RIVCF.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6413541
spellingShingle Ana I. Casanegra
Lisa M. Landrum
Alfonso J. Tafur
Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Patients with Cancer: Complications and Retrieval Success Rate
International Journal of Vascular Medicine
title Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Patients with Cancer: Complications and Retrieval Success Rate
title_full Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Patients with Cancer: Complications and Retrieval Success Rate
title_fullStr Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Patients with Cancer: Complications and Retrieval Success Rate
title_full_unstemmed Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Patients with Cancer: Complications and Retrieval Success Rate
title_short Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Patients with Cancer: Complications and Retrieval Success Rate
title_sort retrievable inferior vena cava filters in patients with cancer complications and retrieval success rate
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6413541
work_keys_str_mv AT anaicasanegra retrievableinferiorvenacavafiltersinpatientswithcancercomplicationsandretrievalsuccessrate
AT lisamlandrum retrievableinferiorvenacavafiltersinpatientswithcancercomplicationsandretrievalsuccessrate
AT alfonsojtafur retrievableinferiorvenacavafiltersinpatientswithcancercomplicationsandretrievalsuccessrate