Unfavorable microbiological impact of directly duodenal biliary drainage in patients with perihilar obstruction: a preliminary report

BackgroundBiliary drainage is frequently used in patients with perihilar obstruction. This study was designed to compare the microbiological characteristics of patients whose biliary trees were either exposed or not exposed to duodenal fluid, depending on the drainage method used.MethodsThe charts o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Veronika Rozhkova, Kamuran Tutuş, Selda Kömeç, Erdem Kınacı, Özgür Bostancı, İlgin Özden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1538676/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849319425957691392
author Veronika Rozhkova
Kamuran Tutuş
Selda Kömeç
Erdem Kınacı
Özgür Bostancı
İlgin Özden
author_facet Veronika Rozhkova
Kamuran Tutuş
Selda Kömeç
Erdem Kınacı
Özgür Bostancı
İlgin Özden
author_sort Veronika Rozhkova
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundBiliary drainage is frequently used in patients with perihilar obstruction. This study was designed to compare the microbiological characteristics of patients whose biliary trees were either exposed or not exposed to duodenal fluid, depending on the drainage method used.MethodsThe charts of 71 patients with perihilar obstruction (any etiology causing an obstruction parallel to that of a proximal cholangiocarcinoma according to the Bismuth–Corlette classification) were evaluated retrospectively. The contacted group comprised 20 patients who underwent either endoscopic stenting or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) with duodenal extension, while the non-contacted group consisted of 51 patients with either external PTBD or surgery upfront.ResultsPositive bile culture results were identified in 19/20 (95%) vs. 17/51 (33%) patients (p = 0.00001) and multimicrobial growth in 13/19 (68%) vs. 4/17 (24%) (p = 0.007) patients in the contacted group and non-contacted group, respectively. Colonization of bile with multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria was worse in the contacted group: 13/19 (68%) vs. 5/17 (29%) (p = 0.02). Significant differences were also found in the frequencies of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) colonization: in the contacted group, positive CRE culture (p = 0.033) and PCR (p = 0.01) were more frequent.ConclusionsThe mode of the biliary drainage—duodenal vs. directly external—significantly modifies the microbiological characteristics of the patients with perihilar obstruction. Catheterization methods that entail continuous exposure of the biliary tree to duodenal fluid are associated with higher frequencies of bactibilia, presence of MDR and XDR bacteria in the bile, and intestinal colonization with CRE.
format Article
id doaj-art-d08c2ef5922b4766a51c9b03eb67f2ef
institution Kabale University
issn 2296-875X
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Surgery
spelling doaj-art-d08c2ef5922b4766a51c9b03eb67f2ef2025-08-20T03:50:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2025-07-011210.3389/fsurg.2025.15386761538676Unfavorable microbiological impact of directly duodenal biliary drainage in patients with perihilar obstruction: a preliminary reportVeronika Rozhkova0Kamuran Tutuş1Selda Kömeç2Erdem Kınacı3Özgür Bostancı4İlgin Özden5Department of General Surgery, Liver Transplantation & Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit, Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, TürkiyeDepartment of General Surgery, Liver Transplantation & Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit, Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, TürkiyeDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, TürkiyeDepartment of General Surgery, Liver Transplantation & Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit, Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, TürkiyeDepartment of General Surgery, Liver Transplantation & Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit, Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, TürkiyeDepartment of General Surgery, Liver Transplantation & Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit, Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, TürkiyeBackgroundBiliary drainage is frequently used in patients with perihilar obstruction. This study was designed to compare the microbiological characteristics of patients whose biliary trees were either exposed or not exposed to duodenal fluid, depending on the drainage method used.MethodsThe charts of 71 patients with perihilar obstruction (any etiology causing an obstruction parallel to that of a proximal cholangiocarcinoma according to the Bismuth–Corlette classification) were evaluated retrospectively. The contacted group comprised 20 patients who underwent either endoscopic stenting or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) with duodenal extension, while the non-contacted group consisted of 51 patients with either external PTBD or surgery upfront.ResultsPositive bile culture results were identified in 19/20 (95%) vs. 17/51 (33%) patients (p = 0.00001) and multimicrobial growth in 13/19 (68%) vs. 4/17 (24%) (p = 0.007) patients in the contacted group and non-contacted group, respectively. Colonization of bile with multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria was worse in the contacted group: 13/19 (68%) vs. 5/17 (29%) (p = 0.02). Significant differences were also found in the frequencies of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) colonization: in the contacted group, positive CRE culture (p = 0.033) and PCR (p = 0.01) were more frequent.ConclusionsThe mode of the biliary drainage—duodenal vs. directly external—significantly modifies the microbiological characteristics of the patients with perihilar obstruction. Catheterization methods that entail continuous exposure of the biliary tree to duodenal fluid are associated with higher frequencies of bactibilia, presence of MDR and XDR bacteria in the bile, and intestinal colonization with CRE.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1538676/fullbactibiliabiliary drainagecarbapenem-resistant Enterobacteralesextensively drug-resistantmultidrug-resistantperihilar
spellingShingle Veronika Rozhkova
Kamuran Tutuş
Selda Kömeç
Erdem Kınacı
Özgür Bostancı
İlgin Özden
Unfavorable microbiological impact of directly duodenal biliary drainage in patients with perihilar obstruction: a preliminary report
Frontiers in Surgery
bactibilia
biliary drainage
carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales
extensively drug-resistant
multidrug-resistant
perihilar
title Unfavorable microbiological impact of directly duodenal biliary drainage in patients with perihilar obstruction: a preliminary report
title_full Unfavorable microbiological impact of directly duodenal biliary drainage in patients with perihilar obstruction: a preliminary report
title_fullStr Unfavorable microbiological impact of directly duodenal biliary drainage in patients with perihilar obstruction: a preliminary report
title_full_unstemmed Unfavorable microbiological impact of directly duodenal biliary drainage in patients with perihilar obstruction: a preliminary report
title_short Unfavorable microbiological impact of directly duodenal biliary drainage in patients with perihilar obstruction: a preliminary report
title_sort unfavorable microbiological impact of directly duodenal biliary drainage in patients with perihilar obstruction a preliminary report
topic bactibilia
biliary drainage
carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales
extensively drug-resistant
multidrug-resistant
perihilar
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1538676/full
work_keys_str_mv AT veronikarozhkova unfavorablemicrobiologicalimpactofdirectlyduodenalbiliarydrainageinpatientswithperihilarobstructionapreliminaryreport
AT kamurantutus unfavorablemicrobiologicalimpactofdirectlyduodenalbiliarydrainageinpatientswithperihilarobstructionapreliminaryreport
AT seldakomec unfavorablemicrobiologicalimpactofdirectlyduodenalbiliarydrainageinpatientswithperihilarobstructionapreliminaryreport
AT erdemkınacı unfavorablemicrobiologicalimpactofdirectlyduodenalbiliarydrainageinpatientswithperihilarobstructionapreliminaryreport
AT ozgurbostancı unfavorablemicrobiologicalimpactofdirectlyduodenalbiliarydrainageinpatientswithperihilarobstructionapreliminaryreport
AT ilginozden unfavorablemicrobiologicalimpactofdirectlyduodenalbiliarydrainageinpatientswithperihilarobstructionapreliminaryreport