Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic surgery in healthcare for older individuals: a systematic review based on randomized controlled trials

ObjectivesThe objective of this research is to assess the economic viability of robotic interventions in the management of healthcare for the aging demographic by conducting a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (SR/MA) of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs).MethodsWe conducted a SR/MA following the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yunkai Tang, Bing Dou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1614654/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849390749613817856
author Yunkai Tang
Bing Dou
author_facet Yunkai Tang
Bing Dou
author_sort Yunkai Tang
collection DOAJ
description ObjectivesThe objective of this research is to assess the economic viability of robotic interventions in the management of healthcare for the aging demographic by conducting a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (SR/MA) of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs).MethodsWe conducted a SR/MA following the PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Collaboration recommendations. Studies of interest were pinpointed within various databases, encompassing PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, up until the cutoff date of November 2024. Inclusion criteria were based on the PICOS framework, focusing on older patients (≥60 years old), robotic or robot-assisted interventions, cost-related outcomes, and RCTs. The data were subjected to statistical evaluation via Stata 17 software, wherein mean discrepancies (MD) and standardized mean discrepancies (SMD) were computed, accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CI) for precision. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to address heterogeneity.ResultsFive RCTs involving 666 patients were included. The findings revealed that robotic surgery incurred higher total costs compared to traditional surgical approaches (MD = 1316.38, 95% CI 10.68–2622.08; p = 0.048, I2 = 92.5%). Subgroup analysis revealed that operating room costs were notable higher for robotic surgeries (MD = 1151.14, 95% CI 824.63–1477.64; p = 0.000, I2 = 0.0%), while hospitalization costs were lower but not statistically significant. Quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains were statistically significant for robotic surgeries (MD = 0.01, 95% CI 0.00–0.02; p = 0.010, I2 = 0.0%). Incremental cost-effectiveness analyses showed that robotic surgery achieved cost-effectiveness in some cases, with incremental costs per QALY ranging from $14,925.62 to $28,860, both below the commonly accepted threshold of $50,000.ConclusionRobotic surgery demonstrate potential cost-effectiveness in older individuals, particularly by improving QALY and reducing long-term healthcare costs. However, the high initial investment remains a significant barrier to adoption. Future research should focus on standardizing economic evaluations, exploring specific applications of robotic therapies, and addressing long-term cost and clinical outcomes to better inform healthcare policy and practice.
format Article
id doaj-art-d061c3326fc04810bfd68a50a0f48e1f
institution Kabale University
issn 2296-2565
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Public Health
spelling doaj-art-d061c3326fc04810bfd68a50a0f48e1f2025-08-20T03:41:21ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652025-08-011310.3389/fpubh.2025.16146541614654Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic surgery in healthcare for older individuals: a systematic review based on randomized controlled trialsYunkai Tang0Bing Dou1School of Law and Politic, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, ChinaSchool of Management, South-Central Minzu University, Wuhan, ChinaObjectivesThe objective of this research is to assess the economic viability of robotic interventions in the management of healthcare for the aging demographic by conducting a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (SR/MA) of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs).MethodsWe conducted a SR/MA following the PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Collaboration recommendations. Studies of interest were pinpointed within various databases, encompassing PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, up until the cutoff date of November 2024. Inclusion criteria were based on the PICOS framework, focusing on older patients (≥60 years old), robotic or robot-assisted interventions, cost-related outcomes, and RCTs. The data were subjected to statistical evaluation via Stata 17 software, wherein mean discrepancies (MD) and standardized mean discrepancies (SMD) were computed, accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CI) for precision. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to address heterogeneity.ResultsFive RCTs involving 666 patients were included. The findings revealed that robotic surgery incurred higher total costs compared to traditional surgical approaches (MD = 1316.38, 95% CI 10.68–2622.08; p = 0.048, I2 = 92.5%). Subgroup analysis revealed that operating room costs were notable higher for robotic surgeries (MD = 1151.14, 95% CI 824.63–1477.64; p = 0.000, I2 = 0.0%), while hospitalization costs were lower but not statistically significant. Quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains were statistically significant for robotic surgeries (MD = 0.01, 95% CI 0.00–0.02; p = 0.010, I2 = 0.0%). Incremental cost-effectiveness analyses showed that robotic surgery achieved cost-effectiveness in some cases, with incremental costs per QALY ranging from $14,925.62 to $28,860, both below the commonly accepted threshold of $50,000.ConclusionRobotic surgery demonstrate potential cost-effectiveness in older individuals, particularly by improving QALY and reducing long-term healthcare costs. However, the high initial investment remains a significant barrier to adoption. Future research should focus on standardizing economic evaluations, exploring specific applications of robotic therapies, and addressing long-term cost and clinical outcomes to better inform healthcare policy and practice.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1614654/fullrobotic surgeryolder individualscost-effectivenessrandomized controlled trialshealth economicssystematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Yunkai Tang
Bing Dou
Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic surgery in healthcare for older individuals: a systematic review based on randomized controlled trials
Frontiers in Public Health
robotic surgery
older individuals
cost-effectiveness
randomized controlled trials
health economics
systematic review and meta-analysis
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic surgery in healthcare for older individuals: a systematic review based on randomized controlled trials
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic surgery in healthcare for older individuals: a systematic review based on randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic surgery in healthcare for older individuals: a systematic review based on randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic surgery in healthcare for older individuals: a systematic review based on randomized controlled trials
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic surgery in healthcare for older individuals: a systematic review based on randomized controlled trials
title_sort cost effectiveness analysis of robotic surgery in healthcare for older individuals a systematic review based on randomized controlled trials
topic robotic surgery
older individuals
cost-effectiveness
randomized controlled trials
health economics
systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1614654/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yunkaitang costeffectivenessanalysisofroboticsurgeryinhealthcareforolderindividualsasystematicreviewbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT bingdou costeffectivenessanalysisofroboticsurgeryinhealthcareforolderindividualsasystematicreviewbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials