Understanding biases in ICESat-2 data due to subsurface scattering using Airborne Topographic Mapper waveform data

<p>The process of laser light reflecting from surfaces made of scattering materials that do not strongly absorb at the wavelength of the laser can involve reflections from hundreds or thousands of individual grains, which can introduce delays in the time between light entering and leaving the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. E. Smith, M. Studinger, T. Sutterley, Z. Fair, T. Neumann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2025-03-01
Series:The Cryosphere
Online Access:https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/975/2025/tc-19-975-2025.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849708948204027904
author B. E. Smith
M. Studinger
T. Sutterley
Z. Fair
T. Neumann
author_facet B. E. Smith
M. Studinger
T. Sutterley
Z. Fair
T. Neumann
author_sort B. E. Smith
collection DOAJ
description <p>The process of laser light reflecting from surfaces made of scattering materials that do not strongly absorb at the wavelength of the laser can involve reflections from hundreds or thousands of individual grains, which can introduce delays in the time between light entering and leaving the surface. These time-of-flight biases depend on the grain size and density of the medium, and thus they can result in spatially and temporally varying surface height biases estimated from laser altimeters, such as NASA's ICESat-2 (Ice Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2) mission. Modeling suggests that ICESat-2 might experience a bias difference as large as 0.1–0.2 <span class="inline-formula">m</span> between coarse-grained melting snow and fine-grained wintertime snow (Smith et al., 2018), which exceeds the mission's requirement to measure seasonal height differences to an accuracy better than 0.1 <span class="inline-formula">m</span> (Markus et al., 2017). In this study, we investigate these biases using a model of subsurface scattering, laser altimetry measurements from NASA's ATM (Airborne Topographic Mapper) system, and grain size estimates based on optical imagery of the ice sheet. We demonstrate that distortions in the shapes of waveforms measured using ATM are related to the optical grain size of the surface estimated using optical reflectance measurements and show that they can be used to estimate an effective grain radius for the surface. Using this effective grain radius as a proxy for the severity of subsurface scattering, we use our model with grain size estimates from optical imagery to simulate corrections for biases in ICESat-2 data due to subsurface scattering and demonstrate that, on the basis of large-scale averages, the corrections calculated based on the satellite optical imagery match the biases in the data. This work demonstrates that waveform-based altimetry data can measure the optical properties of granular surfaces and that corrections based on optical grain size estimates can correct for subsurface-scattering biases in ICESat-2 data.</p>
format Article
id doaj-art-d02a28d649e44fdabc4ced6c5b068083
institution DOAJ
issn 1994-0416
1994-0424
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series The Cryosphere
spelling doaj-art-d02a28d649e44fdabc4ced6c5b0680832025-08-20T03:15:29ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242025-03-011997599510.5194/tc-19-975-2025Understanding biases in ICESat-2 data due to subsurface scattering using Airborne Topographic Mapper waveform dataB. E. Smith0M. Studinger1T. Sutterley2Z. Fair3T. Neumann4University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory Polar Science Center, Seattle, WA 98122, USACryospheric Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USAUniversity of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory Polar Science Center, Seattle, WA 98122, USACryospheric Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USACryospheric Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA<p>The process of laser light reflecting from surfaces made of scattering materials that do not strongly absorb at the wavelength of the laser can involve reflections from hundreds or thousands of individual grains, which can introduce delays in the time between light entering and leaving the surface. These time-of-flight biases depend on the grain size and density of the medium, and thus they can result in spatially and temporally varying surface height biases estimated from laser altimeters, such as NASA's ICESat-2 (Ice Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2) mission. Modeling suggests that ICESat-2 might experience a bias difference as large as 0.1–0.2 <span class="inline-formula">m</span> between coarse-grained melting snow and fine-grained wintertime snow (Smith et al., 2018), which exceeds the mission's requirement to measure seasonal height differences to an accuracy better than 0.1 <span class="inline-formula">m</span> (Markus et al., 2017). In this study, we investigate these biases using a model of subsurface scattering, laser altimetry measurements from NASA's ATM (Airborne Topographic Mapper) system, and grain size estimates based on optical imagery of the ice sheet. We demonstrate that distortions in the shapes of waveforms measured using ATM are related to the optical grain size of the surface estimated using optical reflectance measurements and show that they can be used to estimate an effective grain radius for the surface. Using this effective grain radius as a proxy for the severity of subsurface scattering, we use our model with grain size estimates from optical imagery to simulate corrections for biases in ICESat-2 data due to subsurface scattering and demonstrate that, on the basis of large-scale averages, the corrections calculated based on the satellite optical imagery match the biases in the data. This work demonstrates that waveform-based altimetry data can measure the optical properties of granular surfaces and that corrections based on optical grain size estimates can correct for subsurface-scattering biases in ICESat-2 data.</p>https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/975/2025/tc-19-975-2025.pdf
spellingShingle B. E. Smith
M. Studinger
T. Sutterley
Z. Fair
T. Neumann
Understanding biases in ICESat-2 data due to subsurface scattering using Airborne Topographic Mapper waveform data
The Cryosphere
title Understanding biases in ICESat-2 data due to subsurface scattering using Airborne Topographic Mapper waveform data
title_full Understanding biases in ICESat-2 data due to subsurface scattering using Airborne Topographic Mapper waveform data
title_fullStr Understanding biases in ICESat-2 data due to subsurface scattering using Airborne Topographic Mapper waveform data
title_full_unstemmed Understanding biases in ICESat-2 data due to subsurface scattering using Airborne Topographic Mapper waveform data
title_short Understanding biases in ICESat-2 data due to subsurface scattering using Airborne Topographic Mapper waveform data
title_sort understanding biases in icesat 2 data due to subsurface scattering using airborne topographic mapper waveform data
url https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/975/2025/tc-19-975-2025.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT besmith understandingbiasesinicesat2dataduetosubsurfacescatteringusingairbornetopographicmapperwaveformdata
AT mstudinger understandingbiasesinicesat2dataduetosubsurfacescatteringusingairbornetopographicmapperwaveformdata
AT tsutterley understandingbiasesinicesat2dataduetosubsurfacescatteringusingairbornetopographicmapperwaveformdata
AT zfair understandingbiasesinicesat2dataduetosubsurfacescatteringusingairbornetopographicmapperwaveformdata
AT tneumann understandingbiasesinicesat2dataduetosubsurfacescatteringusingairbornetopographicmapperwaveformdata