Separating CO2 emission from removal targets comes with limited cost impacts
Abstract Net-zero commitments have become the focal point for countries to communicate long-term climate targets. However, to this point it is not clear to what extent conventional emissions reductions and carbon dioxide removal (CDR) will contribute to net-zero. An integrated market for emissions a...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Nature Communications |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60606-7 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850102305386397696 |
|---|---|
| author | Anne Merfort Jessica Strefler Gabriel Abrahão Nico Bauer Tabea Dorndorf Elmar Kriegler Gunnar Luderer Leon Merfort Ottmar Edenhofer |
| author_facet | Anne Merfort Jessica Strefler Gabriel Abrahão Nico Bauer Tabea Dorndorf Elmar Kriegler Gunnar Luderer Leon Merfort Ottmar Edenhofer |
| author_sort | Anne Merfort |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Net-zero commitments have become the focal point for countries to communicate long-term climate targets. However, to this point it is not clear to what extent conventional emissions reductions and carbon dioxide removal (CDR) will contribute to net-zero. An integrated market for emissions and removals with a uniform carbon price delivers the economically efficient contribution of CDR to net-zero. Yet it might not fully internalise sustainability risks of CDR and hence could lead to its overuse. In this study, we explore the implications of separating targets for emissions and for removals delivered by novel CDR in global net-zero emissions pathways with the Integrated Assessment Model REMIND. We find that overall efficiency losses induced by such separation are moderate. Furthermore, limiting the CDR target comes with increasing emission prices but also significant benefits: lower cumulative emissions, a lower financial burden for public finance of CDR and limited reliance on geologic CO2 storage but fails to lower the biomass demand. Proposed targets should also ensure sufficient CDR deployment to achieve net-negative emissions in the second half of the 21st century. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d01ded7824fa4c64916116fe4f0400d7 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2041-1723 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | Nature Portfolio |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Nature Communications |
| spelling | doaj-art-d01ded7824fa4c64916116fe4f0400d72025-08-20T02:39:47ZengNature PortfolioNature Communications2041-17232025-06-0116111010.1038/s41467-025-60606-7Separating CO2 emission from removal targets comes with limited cost impactsAnne Merfort0Jessica Strefler1Gabriel Abrahão2Nico Bauer3Tabea Dorndorf4Elmar Kriegler5Gunnar Luderer6Leon Merfort7Ottmar Edenhofer8Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz AssociationPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz AssociationPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz AssociationPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz AssociationPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz AssociationPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz AssociationPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz AssociationPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz AssociationPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz AssociationAbstract Net-zero commitments have become the focal point for countries to communicate long-term climate targets. However, to this point it is not clear to what extent conventional emissions reductions and carbon dioxide removal (CDR) will contribute to net-zero. An integrated market for emissions and removals with a uniform carbon price delivers the economically efficient contribution of CDR to net-zero. Yet it might not fully internalise sustainability risks of CDR and hence could lead to its overuse. In this study, we explore the implications of separating targets for emissions and for removals delivered by novel CDR in global net-zero emissions pathways with the Integrated Assessment Model REMIND. We find that overall efficiency losses induced by such separation are moderate. Furthermore, limiting the CDR target comes with increasing emission prices but also significant benefits: lower cumulative emissions, a lower financial burden for public finance of CDR and limited reliance on geologic CO2 storage but fails to lower the biomass demand. Proposed targets should also ensure sufficient CDR deployment to achieve net-negative emissions in the second half of the 21st century.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60606-7 |
| spellingShingle | Anne Merfort Jessica Strefler Gabriel Abrahão Nico Bauer Tabea Dorndorf Elmar Kriegler Gunnar Luderer Leon Merfort Ottmar Edenhofer Separating CO2 emission from removal targets comes with limited cost impacts Nature Communications |
| title | Separating CO2 emission from removal targets comes with limited cost impacts |
| title_full | Separating CO2 emission from removal targets comes with limited cost impacts |
| title_fullStr | Separating CO2 emission from removal targets comes with limited cost impacts |
| title_full_unstemmed | Separating CO2 emission from removal targets comes with limited cost impacts |
| title_short | Separating CO2 emission from removal targets comes with limited cost impacts |
| title_sort | separating co2 emission from removal targets comes with limited cost impacts |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60606-7 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT annemerfort separatingco2emissionfromremovaltargetscomeswithlimitedcostimpacts AT jessicastrefler separatingco2emissionfromremovaltargetscomeswithlimitedcostimpacts AT gabrielabrahao separatingco2emissionfromremovaltargetscomeswithlimitedcostimpacts AT nicobauer separatingco2emissionfromremovaltargetscomeswithlimitedcostimpacts AT tabeadorndorf separatingco2emissionfromremovaltargetscomeswithlimitedcostimpacts AT elmarkriegler separatingco2emissionfromremovaltargetscomeswithlimitedcostimpacts AT gunnarluderer separatingco2emissionfromremovaltargetscomeswithlimitedcostimpacts AT leonmerfort separatingco2emissionfromremovaltargetscomeswithlimitedcostimpacts AT ottmaredenhofer separatingco2emissionfromremovaltargetscomeswithlimitedcostimpacts |