Evaluation of Different Generative Models to Support the Validation of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems

Validating the safety and reliability of automated driving systems is a critical challenge in the development of autonomous driving technology. Such systems must reliably replicate human driving behavior across scenarios of varying complexity and criticality. Ensuring this level of accuracy necessit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manasa Mariam Mammen, Zafer Kayatas, Dieter Bestle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Applied Mechanics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-3161/6/2/39
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850156342800547840
author Manasa Mariam Mammen
Zafer Kayatas
Dieter Bestle
author_facet Manasa Mariam Mammen
Zafer Kayatas
Dieter Bestle
author_sort Manasa Mariam Mammen
collection DOAJ
description Validating the safety and reliability of automated driving systems is a critical challenge in the development of autonomous driving technology. Such systems must reliably replicate human driving behavior across scenarios of varying complexity and criticality. Ensuring this level of accuracy necessitates robust testing methodologies that can systematically assess performance under various driving conditions. Scenario-based testing addresses this challenge by recreating safety-critical situations at varying levels of abstraction, from simulations to real-world field tests. However, conventional parameterized models for scenario generation are often resource intensive, prone to bias from simplifications, and limited in capturing realistic vehicle trajectories. To overcome these limitations, the paper explores AI-based methods for scenario generation, with a focus on the cut-in maneuver. Four different approaches are trained and compared: Variational Autoencoder enhanced with a convolutional neural network (VAE), a basic Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), Wasserstein GAN (WGAN), and Time-Series GAN (TimeGAN). Their performance is assessed with respect to their ability to generate realistic and diverse trajectories for the cut-in scenario using qualitative analysis, quantitative metrics, and statistical analysis. Among the investigated approaches, VAE demonstrates superior performance, effectively generating realistic and diverse scenarios while maintaining computational efficiency.
format Article
id doaj-art-cfc9db11015b47d2a106129ee419e9be
institution OA Journals
issn 2673-3161
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Mechanics
spelling doaj-art-cfc9db11015b47d2a106129ee419e9be2025-08-20T02:24:34ZengMDPI AGApplied Mechanics2673-31612025-05-01623910.3390/applmech6020039Evaluation of Different Generative Models to Support the Validation of Advanced Driver Assistance SystemsManasa Mariam Mammen0Zafer Kayatas1Dieter Bestle2Mercedes-Benz AG, Kolumbusstr. 19+21, 71063 Sindelfingen, GermanyMercedes-Benz AG, Kolumbusstr. 19+21, 71063 Sindelfingen, GermanyDepartment of Engineering Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Siemens-Halske-Ring 14, 03046 Cottbus, GermanyValidating the safety and reliability of automated driving systems is a critical challenge in the development of autonomous driving technology. Such systems must reliably replicate human driving behavior across scenarios of varying complexity and criticality. Ensuring this level of accuracy necessitates robust testing methodologies that can systematically assess performance under various driving conditions. Scenario-based testing addresses this challenge by recreating safety-critical situations at varying levels of abstraction, from simulations to real-world field tests. However, conventional parameterized models for scenario generation are often resource intensive, prone to bias from simplifications, and limited in capturing realistic vehicle trajectories. To overcome these limitations, the paper explores AI-based methods for scenario generation, with a focus on the cut-in maneuver. Four different approaches are trained and compared: Variational Autoencoder enhanced with a convolutional neural network (VAE), a basic Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), Wasserstein GAN (WGAN), and Time-Series GAN (TimeGAN). Their performance is assessed with respect to their ability to generate realistic and diverse trajectories for the cut-in scenario using qualitative analysis, quantitative metrics, and statistical analysis. Among the investigated approaches, VAE demonstrates superior performance, effectively generating realistic and diverse scenarios while maintaining computational efficiency.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-3161/6/2/39advanced driver assistance systemreal cut-in maneuversynthetic datavariational autoencodergenerative adversarial networksmachine learning
spellingShingle Manasa Mariam Mammen
Zafer Kayatas
Dieter Bestle
Evaluation of Different Generative Models to Support the Validation of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems
Applied Mechanics
advanced driver assistance system
real cut-in maneuver
synthetic data
variational autoencoder
generative adversarial networks
machine learning
title Evaluation of Different Generative Models to Support the Validation of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems
title_full Evaluation of Different Generative Models to Support the Validation of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems
title_fullStr Evaluation of Different Generative Models to Support the Validation of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Different Generative Models to Support the Validation of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems
title_short Evaluation of Different Generative Models to Support the Validation of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems
title_sort evaluation of different generative models to support the validation of advanced driver assistance systems
topic advanced driver assistance system
real cut-in maneuver
synthetic data
variational autoencoder
generative adversarial networks
machine learning
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-3161/6/2/39
work_keys_str_mv AT manasamariammammen evaluationofdifferentgenerativemodelstosupportthevalidationofadvanceddriverassistancesystems
AT zaferkayatas evaluationofdifferentgenerativemodelstosupportthevalidationofadvanceddriverassistancesystems
AT dieterbestle evaluationofdifferentgenerativemodelstosupportthevalidationofadvanceddriverassistancesystems