Risiko for bias i retspsykiatriske vurderinger

Abstract To reach better-informed decisions about psycho-legal issues, courts in Denmark and other countries request psychiatric and psychological expertise opinions on emotional, behavioral, and/or cognitive functioning of charged individuals and on court sentencing for convicts. The process of pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susanne Bengtson, Pia Lykke Hjortebjerg
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: De Nordiske Kriminalistforeninger 2023-06-01
Series:Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tidsskrift.dk/NTfK/article/view/138264
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841556188635856896
author Susanne Bengtson
Pia Lykke Hjortebjerg
author_facet Susanne Bengtson
Pia Lykke Hjortebjerg
author_sort Susanne Bengtson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract To reach better-informed decisions about psycho-legal issues, courts in Denmark and other countries request psychiatric and psychological expertise opinions on emotional, behavioral, and/or cognitive functioning of charged individuals and on court sentencing for convicts. The process of professional decision-making has, however, for decades been recognized as vulnerable to becoming biased. Biases are a potential result of humans’ applying  cognitive short-cuts ( heuristics) to ensure fast and effective decision-making. While bias in forensic psychiatry has been examined internationally, this subject has been issued only scarcely in Denmark. This paper aims to introduce to theoretical basics and empirical findings on bias, cognitive heuristics, and debiasing strategies broadly and specifically to forensic psychiatry. The objective is to inform and improve professional practice within forensic psychiatry.
format Article
id doaj-art-cfc1b2ad82d74be0978ed09971f552ef
institution Kabale University
issn 2446-3051
language Danish
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher De Nordiske Kriminalistforeninger
record_format Article
series Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab
spelling doaj-art-cfc1b2ad82d74be0978ed09971f552ef2025-01-07T13:17:48ZdanDe Nordiske KriminalistforeningerNordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab2446-30512023-06-01110215917510.7146/ntfk.v110i2.138264131734Risiko for bias i retspsykiatriske vurderingerSusanne BengtsonPia Lykke HjortebjergAbstract To reach better-informed decisions about psycho-legal issues, courts in Denmark and other countries request psychiatric and psychological expertise opinions on emotional, behavioral, and/or cognitive functioning of charged individuals and on court sentencing for convicts. The process of professional decision-making has, however, for decades been recognized as vulnerable to becoming biased. Biases are a potential result of humans’ applying  cognitive short-cuts ( heuristics) to ensure fast and effective decision-making. While bias in forensic psychiatry has been examined internationally, this subject has been issued only scarcely in Denmark. This paper aims to introduce to theoretical basics and empirical findings on bias, cognitive heuristics, and debiasing strategies broadly and specifically to forensic psychiatry. The objective is to inform and improve professional practice within forensic psychiatry.https://tidsskrift.dk/NTfK/article/view/138264cognitive heuristicscognitive biasclinical judgmentforensic psychiatry
spellingShingle Susanne Bengtson
Pia Lykke Hjortebjerg
Risiko for bias i retspsykiatriske vurderinger
Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab
cognitive heuristics
cognitive bias
clinical judgment
forensic psychiatry
title Risiko for bias i retspsykiatriske vurderinger
title_full Risiko for bias i retspsykiatriske vurderinger
title_fullStr Risiko for bias i retspsykiatriske vurderinger
title_full_unstemmed Risiko for bias i retspsykiatriske vurderinger
title_short Risiko for bias i retspsykiatriske vurderinger
title_sort risiko for bias i retspsykiatriske vurderinger
topic cognitive heuristics
cognitive bias
clinical judgment
forensic psychiatry
url https://tidsskrift.dk/NTfK/article/view/138264
work_keys_str_mv AT susannebengtson risikoforbiasiretspsykiatriskevurderinger
AT pialykkehjortebjerg risikoforbiasiretspsykiatriskevurderinger