A comparative analysis of stem cells derived from young rabbit knee joints: the potentially superior performance of decellularized extracellular matrix pretreated infrapatellar fat pad stem cells on nanofiber scaffolds

IntroductionOsteoarthritis (OA) remains a significant clinical challenge, necessitating improved strategies for cartilage repair. Stem cells and scaffolds have crucial roles in tissue repair and regeneration. In this study, we comprehensively investigated the proliferation and differentiation potent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhixin Wei, Qingqing Yu, Qingyun Xie, Dongfa Liao, Xue Gou, Song Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2025.1539308/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850098063280963584
author Zhixin Wei
Qingqing Yu
Qingyun Xie
Dongfa Liao
Xue Gou
Song Chen
Song Chen
author_facet Zhixin Wei
Qingqing Yu
Qingyun Xie
Dongfa Liao
Xue Gou
Song Chen
Song Chen
author_sort Zhixin Wei
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionOsteoarthritis (OA) remains a significant clinical challenge, necessitating improved strategies for cartilage repair. Stem cells and scaffolds have crucial roles in tissue repair and regeneration. In this study, we comprehensively investigated the proliferation and differentiation potential of infrapatellar fat pad stem cells (IFPSCs), synovium-derived stem cells (SDSCs), and bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) from unpretreated knee joints in young rabbits, and after decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) deposition by stem cell pretreatment in vitro.MethodsWe also examined adhesion and differentiation effects of poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) and poly-D, L-lactic acid (PDLLA) scaffolds after inoculation with the three stem cell types. We conducted osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic induction studies using three unpretreated stem cell groups, nine stem cell groups cross-preconditioned with different dECM types, and six stem cell groups cultured on nanofiber PLLA and PDLLA scaffolds. Staining and PCR analyses were then performed.ResultsIn vitro studies indicated that without pretreatment, IFPSCs exhibited the highest proliferation capacity, followed by SDSCs, while BMSCs had the lowest proliferation rate. After cross-pretreatment with dECMs from different sources, IFPSCs pretreated with IECM (decellularized extracellular matrix deposited by IFPSCs) showed the greatest proliferation. BMSCs displayed the highest osteogenic potential, while SDSCs and IFPSCs showed greater chondrogenic potential. No significant differences were observed in adipogenic potential among the three groups. BMSCs exhibited reduced osteogenic potential after pretreatment with all three dECMs, whereas IFPSCs and SDSCs showed enhanced osteogenic potential following SECM and IECM pretreatment, respectively. Additionally, all 3 cell types showed reduced lipogenic potential after pretreatment with the three dECM types. For chondrogenesis, BECM pretreatment were suitable for enhancing the chondrogenic potential of all 3 cell types. Furthermore, BMSCs and IFPSCs exhibited better adhesion and survival than SDSCs on electrospun scaffolds, which mimicked dECM structures. Besides, BMSCs and IFPSCs are more suitable for PLLA to promote osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation, whereas SDSCs are better suited for PDLLA.DiscussionOverall, it is anticipated that IFPSCs can be expanded with BECM pretreatment in vitro, and when combined with degradable nanofiber PLLA scaffolds in vivo, will facilitate better OA repair.
format Article
id doaj-art-cef2ed504a574cdc90674f96bb211793
institution DOAJ
issn 2296-634X
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
spelling doaj-art-cef2ed504a574cdc90674f96bb2117932025-08-20T02:40:48ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology2296-634X2025-03-011310.3389/fcell.2025.15393081539308A comparative analysis of stem cells derived from young rabbit knee joints: the potentially superior performance of decellularized extracellular matrix pretreated infrapatellar fat pad stem cells on nanofiber scaffoldsZhixin Wei0Qingqing Yu1Qingyun Xie2Dongfa Liao3Xue Gou4Song Chen5Song Chen6College of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan, ChinaCollege of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan, ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, College of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan, ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, College of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan, ChinaInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, College of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan, ChinaPancreatic Injury and Repair Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, ChinaIntroductionOsteoarthritis (OA) remains a significant clinical challenge, necessitating improved strategies for cartilage repair. Stem cells and scaffolds have crucial roles in tissue repair and regeneration. In this study, we comprehensively investigated the proliferation and differentiation potential of infrapatellar fat pad stem cells (IFPSCs), synovium-derived stem cells (SDSCs), and bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) from unpretreated knee joints in young rabbits, and after decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) deposition by stem cell pretreatment in vitro.MethodsWe also examined adhesion and differentiation effects of poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) and poly-D, L-lactic acid (PDLLA) scaffolds after inoculation with the three stem cell types. We conducted osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic induction studies using three unpretreated stem cell groups, nine stem cell groups cross-preconditioned with different dECM types, and six stem cell groups cultured on nanofiber PLLA and PDLLA scaffolds. Staining and PCR analyses were then performed.ResultsIn vitro studies indicated that without pretreatment, IFPSCs exhibited the highest proliferation capacity, followed by SDSCs, while BMSCs had the lowest proliferation rate. After cross-pretreatment with dECMs from different sources, IFPSCs pretreated with IECM (decellularized extracellular matrix deposited by IFPSCs) showed the greatest proliferation. BMSCs displayed the highest osteogenic potential, while SDSCs and IFPSCs showed greater chondrogenic potential. No significant differences were observed in adipogenic potential among the three groups. BMSCs exhibited reduced osteogenic potential after pretreatment with all three dECMs, whereas IFPSCs and SDSCs showed enhanced osteogenic potential following SECM and IECM pretreatment, respectively. Additionally, all 3 cell types showed reduced lipogenic potential after pretreatment with the three dECM types. For chondrogenesis, BECM pretreatment were suitable for enhancing the chondrogenic potential of all 3 cell types. Furthermore, BMSCs and IFPSCs exhibited better adhesion and survival than SDSCs on electrospun scaffolds, which mimicked dECM structures. Besides, BMSCs and IFPSCs are more suitable for PLLA to promote osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation, whereas SDSCs are better suited for PDLLA.DiscussionOverall, it is anticipated that IFPSCs can be expanded with BECM pretreatment in vitro, and when combined with degradable nanofiber PLLA scaffolds in vivo, will facilitate better OA repair.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2025.1539308/fullmesenchymal stem cellsdecellularized extracellular matrix (dECM)electrospun nanofiber scaffoldsosteogenesisadipogenesischondrogenesis
spellingShingle Zhixin Wei
Qingqing Yu
Qingyun Xie
Dongfa Liao
Xue Gou
Song Chen
Song Chen
A comparative analysis of stem cells derived from young rabbit knee joints: the potentially superior performance of decellularized extracellular matrix pretreated infrapatellar fat pad stem cells on nanofiber scaffolds
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
mesenchymal stem cells
decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM)
electrospun nanofiber scaffolds
osteogenesis
adipogenesis
chondrogenesis
title A comparative analysis of stem cells derived from young rabbit knee joints: the potentially superior performance of decellularized extracellular matrix pretreated infrapatellar fat pad stem cells on nanofiber scaffolds
title_full A comparative analysis of stem cells derived from young rabbit knee joints: the potentially superior performance of decellularized extracellular matrix pretreated infrapatellar fat pad stem cells on nanofiber scaffolds
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of stem cells derived from young rabbit knee joints: the potentially superior performance of decellularized extracellular matrix pretreated infrapatellar fat pad stem cells on nanofiber scaffolds
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of stem cells derived from young rabbit knee joints: the potentially superior performance of decellularized extracellular matrix pretreated infrapatellar fat pad stem cells on nanofiber scaffolds
title_short A comparative analysis of stem cells derived from young rabbit knee joints: the potentially superior performance of decellularized extracellular matrix pretreated infrapatellar fat pad stem cells on nanofiber scaffolds
title_sort comparative analysis of stem cells derived from young rabbit knee joints the potentially superior performance of decellularized extracellular matrix pretreated infrapatellar fat pad stem cells on nanofiber scaffolds
topic mesenchymal stem cells
decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM)
electrospun nanofiber scaffolds
osteogenesis
adipogenesis
chondrogenesis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2025.1539308/full
work_keys_str_mv AT zhixinwei acomparativeanalysisofstemcellsderivedfromyoungrabbitkneejointsthepotentiallysuperiorperformanceofdecellularizedextracellularmatrixpretreatedinfrapatellarfatpadstemcellsonnanofiberscaffolds
AT qingqingyu acomparativeanalysisofstemcellsderivedfromyoungrabbitkneejointsthepotentiallysuperiorperformanceofdecellularizedextracellularmatrixpretreatedinfrapatellarfatpadstemcellsonnanofiberscaffolds
AT qingyunxie acomparativeanalysisofstemcellsderivedfromyoungrabbitkneejointsthepotentiallysuperiorperformanceofdecellularizedextracellularmatrixpretreatedinfrapatellarfatpadstemcellsonnanofiberscaffolds
AT dongfaliao acomparativeanalysisofstemcellsderivedfromyoungrabbitkneejointsthepotentiallysuperiorperformanceofdecellularizedextracellularmatrixpretreatedinfrapatellarfatpadstemcellsonnanofiberscaffolds
AT xuegou acomparativeanalysisofstemcellsderivedfromyoungrabbitkneejointsthepotentiallysuperiorperformanceofdecellularizedextracellularmatrixpretreatedinfrapatellarfatpadstemcellsonnanofiberscaffolds
AT songchen acomparativeanalysisofstemcellsderivedfromyoungrabbitkneejointsthepotentiallysuperiorperformanceofdecellularizedextracellularmatrixpretreatedinfrapatellarfatpadstemcellsonnanofiberscaffolds
AT songchen acomparativeanalysisofstemcellsderivedfromyoungrabbitkneejointsthepotentiallysuperiorperformanceofdecellularizedextracellularmatrixpretreatedinfrapatellarfatpadstemcellsonnanofiberscaffolds
AT zhixinwei comparativeanalysisofstemcellsderivedfromyoungrabbitkneejointsthepotentiallysuperiorperformanceofdecellularizedextracellularmatrixpretreatedinfrapatellarfatpadstemcellsonnanofiberscaffolds
AT qingqingyu comparativeanalysisofstemcellsderivedfromyoungrabbitkneejointsthepotentiallysuperiorperformanceofdecellularizedextracellularmatrixpretreatedinfrapatellarfatpadstemcellsonnanofiberscaffolds
AT qingyunxie comparativeanalysisofstemcellsderivedfromyoungrabbitkneejointsthepotentiallysuperiorperformanceofdecellularizedextracellularmatrixpretreatedinfrapatellarfatpadstemcellsonnanofiberscaffolds
AT dongfaliao comparativeanalysisofstemcellsderivedfromyoungrabbitkneejointsthepotentiallysuperiorperformanceofdecellularizedextracellularmatrixpretreatedinfrapatellarfatpadstemcellsonnanofiberscaffolds
AT xuegou comparativeanalysisofstemcellsderivedfromyoungrabbitkneejointsthepotentiallysuperiorperformanceofdecellularizedextracellularmatrixpretreatedinfrapatellarfatpadstemcellsonnanofiberscaffolds
AT songchen comparativeanalysisofstemcellsderivedfromyoungrabbitkneejointsthepotentiallysuperiorperformanceofdecellularizedextracellularmatrixpretreatedinfrapatellarfatpadstemcellsonnanofiberscaffolds
AT songchen comparativeanalysisofstemcellsderivedfromyoungrabbitkneejointsthepotentiallysuperiorperformanceofdecellularizedextracellularmatrixpretreatedinfrapatellarfatpadstemcellsonnanofiberscaffolds