Effects of acupuncture versus moxibustion on functional dyspepsia: a randomized clinical trial

Abstract Background Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder, despite its high prevalence and impact on quality of life, effective treatments are limited. Acupuncture and moxibustion, two complementary therapies based on traditional Chinese medicine, have shown potential in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yangke Mao, Pan Zhang, Zhaoxuan He, Yuke Teng, Zilei Tian, Sha Yang, Kuan Fang, Wei Zhang, Yuting Wang, Tao Yin, Fang Zeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-08-01
Series:Chinese Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-025-01187-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849225944297897984
author Yangke Mao
Pan Zhang
Zhaoxuan He
Yuke Teng
Zilei Tian
Sha Yang
Kuan Fang
Wei Zhang
Yuting Wang
Tao Yin
Fang Zeng
author_facet Yangke Mao
Pan Zhang
Zhaoxuan He
Yuke Teng
Zilei Tian
Sha Yang
Kuan Fang
Wei Zhang
Yuting Wang
Tao Yin
Fang Zeng
author_sort Yangke Mao
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder, despite its high prevalence and impact on quality of life, effective treatments are limited. Acupuncture and moxibustion, two complementary therapies based on traditional Chinese medicine, have shown potential in alleviating FD symptoms. However, the differences of acupuncture and moxibustion in FD are unclear. Methods A total of 144 eligible FD patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the acupuncture or moxibustion group to receive 20 treatment sessions. The primary outcome was the Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (SFLDQ) total score after 4 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes included SFLDQ symptom-specific score, Nepean Dyspepsia Life Quality Index etc. Linear mixed-effects model was used for analyses. Results There was no difference in SFLDQ total score after treatment with acupuncture compared with moxibustion (difference, 0.08[95% CI −0.634 to 0.794], p = 0.82), despite both groups were effective. However, the results of the secondary outcomes showed that compared with moxibustion, acupuncture was more effective in alleviating epigastric pain (difference, -0.318[95% CI −0.056 to −0.579], p = 0.017) and anxiety mood (difference, −2.893[95% CI −0.419 to −5.367], p = .022). On the other hand, moxibustion was more effective than acupuncture in reducing post-prandial fullness (difference, −0.3[95% CI −0.551 to −0.048], p = .02). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the groups. Conclusions Both the acupuncture and moxibustion groups showed significant improvement in FD symptoms. Although there were no significant differences between the groups at week 4 for the primary outcome, acupuncture exhibited greater improvement in addressing epigastric pain and reduction in anxiety symptoms while moxibustion demonstrated a larger reduction in improving post-prandial fullness. Choice of acupuncture and moxibustion should be tailored to the primary symptoms of FD patients to achieve optimal efficacy. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ID: ChiCTR2100049496). Graphical Abstract
format Article
id doaj-art-cee3f9a6695e4011ada2e0e26b31e2c2
institution Kabale University
issn 1749-8546
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Chinese Medicine
spelling doaj-art-cee3f9a6695e4011ada2e0e26b31e2c22025-08-24T11:50:20ZengBMCChinese Medicine1749-85462025-08-0120111010.1186/s13020-025-01187-xEffects of acupuncture versus moxibustion on functional dyspepsia: a randomized clinical trialYangke Mao0Pan Zhang1Zhaoxuan He2Yuke Teng3Zilei Tian4Sha Yang5Kuan Fang6Wei Zhang7Yuting Wang8Tao Yin9Fang Zeng10Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineNervous System Disease Treatment Center, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of MeishanAcupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineAcupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineAcupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineAcupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineDepartment of Hospital Health Management/Physical Examination, Chengdu Fifth People’s Hospital, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineAcupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineAcupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineAcupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineAcupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineAbstract Background Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder, despite its high prevalence and impact on quality of life, effective treatments are limited. Acupuncture and moxibustion, two complementary therapies based on traditional Chinese medicine, have shown potential in alleviating FD symptoms. However, the differences of acupuncture and moxibustion in FD are unclear. Methods A total of 144 eligible FD patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the acupuncture or moxibustion group to receive 20 treatment sessions. The primary outcome was the Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (SFLDQ) total score after 4 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes included SFLDQ symptom-specific score, Nepean Dyspepsia Life Quality Index etc. Linear mixed-effects model was used for analyses. Results There was no difference in SFLDQ total score after treatment with acupuncture compared with moxibustion (difference, 0.08[95% CI −0.634 to 0.794], p = 0.82), despite both groups were effective. However, the results of the secondary outcomes showed that compared with moxibustion, acupuncture was more effective in alleviating epigastric pain (difference, -0.318[95% CI −0.056 to −0.579], p = 0.017) and anxiety mood (difference, −2.893[95% CI −0.419 to −5.367], p = .022). On the other hand, moxibustion was more effective than acupuncture in reducing post-prandial fullness (difference, −0.3[95% CI −0.551 to −0.048], p = .02). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the groups. Conclusions Both the acupuncture and moxibustion groups showed significant improvement in FD symptoms. Although there were no significant differences between the groups at week 4 for the primary outcome, acupuncture exhibited greater improvement in addressing epigastric pain and reduction in anxiety symptoms while moxibustion demonstrated a larger reduction in improving post-prandial fullness. Choice of acupuncture and moxibustion should be tailored to the primary symptoms of FD patients to achieve optimal efficacy. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ID: ChiCTR2100049496). Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-025-01187-xFunctional dyspepsiaAcupunctureMoxibustionComplementary and alternative medicineEpigastric painPost-prandial fullness
spellingShingle Yangke Mao
Pan Zhang
Zhaoxuan He
Yuke Teng
Zilei Tian
Sha Yang
Kuan Fang
Wei Zhang
Yuting Wang
Tao Yin
Fang Zeng
Effects of acupuncture versus moxibustion on functional dyspepsia: a randomized clinical trial
Chinese Medicine
Functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture
Moxibustion
Complementary and alternative medicine
Epigastric pain
Post-prandial fullness
title Effects of acupuncture versus moxibustion on functional dyspepsia: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Effects of acupuncture versus moxibustion on functional dyspepsia: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Effects of acupuncture versus moxibustion on functional dyspepsia: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of acupuncture versus moxibustion on functional dyspepsia: a randomized clinical trial
title_short Effects of acupuncture versus moxibustion on functional dyspepsia: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort effects of acupuncture versus moxibustion on functional dyspepsia a randomized clinical trial
topic Functional dyspepsia
Acupuncture
Moxibustion
Complementary and alternative medicine
Epigastric pain
Post-prandial fullness
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-025-01187-x
work_keys_str_mv AT yangkemao effectsofacupunctureversusmoxibustiononfunctionaldyspepsiaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT panzhang effectsofacupunctureversusmoxibustiononfunctionaldyspepsiaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zhaoxuanhe effectsofacupunctureversusmoxibustiononfunctionaldyspepsiaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT yuketeng effectsofacupunctureversusmoxibustiononfunctionaldyspepsiaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zileitian effectsofacupunctureversusmoxibustiononfunctionaldyspepsiaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT shayang effectsofacupunctureversusmoxibustiononfunctionaldyspepsiaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kuanfang effectsofacupunctureversusmoxibustiononfunctionaldyspepsiaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT weizhang effectsofacupunctureversusmoxibustiononfunctionaldyspepsiaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT yutingwang effectsofacupunctureversusmoxibustiononfunctionaldyspepsiaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT taoyin effectsofacupunctureversusmoxibustiononfunctionaldyspepsiaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT fangzeng effectsofacupunctureversusmoxibustiononfunctionaldyspepsiaarandomizedclinicaltrial