Enhancing intra-axial brain surgery in resource-limited settings: a pilot study balancing safety and radicality

Abstract Background In Low-Middle-Income Countries (LMIC), the high cost of advanced surgical tools and limited access to specialized training restricts the ability to maximize the safety and thoroughness of intra-axial lesion surgeries especially for Diffuse Low-Grade Glioma (DLGG) Aim To enhance s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammed Osama ELArossi, Mohammed Ashraf Ghobashy, Hisham Anwar Abdelrihim, Zeiad Youssry Ibrahem Fayed, Abdelrahman Hesham Elgayar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-08-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-025-00405-w
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849333570948038656
author Mohammed Osama ELArossi
Mohammed Ashraf Ghobashy
Hisham Anwar Abdelrihim
Zeiad Youssry Ibrahem Fayed
Abdelrahman Hesham Elgayar
author_facet Mohammed Osama ELArossi
Mohammed Ashraf Ghobashy
Hisham Anwar Abdelrihim
Zeiad Youssry Ibrahem Fayed
Abdelrahman Hesham Elgayar
author_sort Mohammed Osama ELArossi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background In Low-Middle-Income Countries (LMIC), the high cost of advanced surgical tools and limited access to specialized training restricts the ability to maximize the safety and thoroughness of intra-axial lesion surgeries especially for Diffuse Low-Grade Glioma (DLGG) Aim To enhance surgical safety and radicality on intra-axial brain lesions putatively diagnosed as DLGG. We evaluated four surgical techniques at our resource-limited institution: conventional asleep surgery, asleep surgery with intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS), awake craniotomy (AC) with intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), and AC with both IOUS and IONM. We also aim to report our single institution experience and lessons learned concerning the AC procedure from the perspective of LMIC. Results Forty-six patients aged fourteen years or older, harboring intra-axial brain lesions with the preoperative radiological diagnosis of DLGG were included. Outcomes were compared across the four surgical techniques, focusing on the extent of resection (EOR), complication rates, functional outcomes, blood loss, and length of hospital stay. Awake Craniotomy with both IOUS and IONM, compared to conventional surgery, achieved a significantly higher EOR (98.49% vs. 71.78%, p = 0.007) and a 100% gross total resection rate (vs. 41.18%, p = 0.012). However, this approach also led to a higher rate of immediate postoperative complications (88.89% vs. 47.06%, p = 0.02), a significant decline in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (− 22.22 vs. − 2.35, p = 0.007), and longer hospital stays (15.00 vs. 7.29 days, p = 0.00002). No significant difference between the groups was observed in persistent neurological deficits (PNDs) (p = 1.0). Conclusion Our pilot study demonstrated that the use of AC with IOUS and IONM significantly enhanced the resection of various diffuse intra-axial lesions. However, this approach also led to higher immediate postoperative complications and extended hospital stays. Thus, while advanced modalities offer substantial benefits, they can also present significant burdens without proper training, particularly in resource-constrained environments. As a LMIC, our institute has shown the potential to implement AC. Though it is still in its early stages facing numerous challenges that necessitate further training and potential multicenter collaboration for refinement. Thus for improved outcomes that balance between safety and radicality in LMIC institutes like ours, we would require a comprehensive knowledge transfer, dedicated personnel training, larger studies with longer follow-up periods, and a tailored approach to patient-by-patient resource allocation.
format Article
id doaj-art-ce4f2a036ea14fb19b4b6b985da15305
institution Kabale University
issn 2520-8225
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery
spelling doaj-art-ce4f2a036ea14fb19b4b6b985da153052025-08-20T03:45:48ZengSpringerOpenEgyptian Journal of Neurosurgery2520-82252025-08-0140111710.1186/s41984-025-00405-wEnhancing intra-axial brain surgery in resource-limited settings: a pilot study balancing safety and radicalityMohammed Osama ELArossi0Mohammed Ashraf Ghobashy1Hisham Anwar Abdelrihim2Zeiad Youssry Ibrahem Fayed3Abdelrahman Hesham Elgayar4Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams UniversityNeurosurgery and Spine Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams UniversityNeurosurgery and Spine Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams UniversityNeurosurgery and Spine Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams UniversityNeurosurgery and Spine Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams UniversityAbstract Background In Low-Middle-Income Countries (LMIC), the high cost of advanced surgical tools and limited access to specialized training restricts the ability to maximize the safety and thoroughness of intra-axial lesion surgeries especially for Diffuse Low-Grade Glioma (DLGG) Aim To enhance surgical safety and radicality on intra-axial brain lesions putatively diagnosed as DLGG. We evaluated four surgical techniques at our resource-limited institution: conventional asleep surgery, asleep surgery with intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS), awake craniotomy (AC) with intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), and AC with both IOUS and IONM. We also aim to report our single institution experience and lessons learned concerning the AC procedure from the perspective of LMIC. Results Forty-six patients aged fourteen years or older, harboring intra-axial brain lesions with the preoperative radiological diagnosis of DLGG were included. Outcomes were compared across the four surgical techniques, focusing on the extent of resection (EOR), complication rates, functional outcomes, blood loss, and length of hospital stay. Awake Craniotomy with both IOUS and IONM, compared to conventional surgery, achieved a significantly higher EOR (98.49% vs. 71.78%, p = 0.007) and a 100% gross total resection rate (vs. 41.18%, p = 0.012). However, this approach also led to a higher rate of immediate postoperative complications (88.89% vs. 47.06%, p = 0.02), a significant decline in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (− 22.22 vs. − 2.35, p = 0.007), and longer hospital stays (15.00 vs. 7.29 days, p = 0.00002). No significant difference between the groups was observed in persistent neurological deficits (PNDs) (p = 1.0). Conclusion Our pilot study demonstrated that the use of AC with IOUS and IONM significantly enhanced the resection of various diffuse intra-axial lesions. However, this approach also led to higher immediate postoperative complications and extended hospital stays. Thus, while advanced modalities offer substantial benefits, they can also present significant burdens without proper training, particularly in resource-constrained environments. As a LMIC, our institute has shown the potential to implement AC. Though it is still in its early stages facing numerous challenges that necessitate further training and potential multicenter collaboration for refinement. Thus for improved outcomes that balance between safety and radicality in LMIC institutes like ours, we would require a comprehensive knowledge transfer, dedicated personnel training, larger studies with longer follow-up periods, and a tailored approach to patient-by-patient resource allocation.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-025-00405-wLow-grade gliomaIntra-axial lesionNeuronavigationAwake craniotomyLimited resourcesIntraoperative ultrasound
spellingShingle Mohammed Osama ELArossi
Mohammed Ashraf Ghobashy
Hisham Anwar Abdelrihim
Zeiad Youssry Ibrahem Fayed
Abdelrahman Hesham Elgayar
Enhancing intra-axial brain surgery in resource-limited settings: a pilot study balancing safety and radicality
Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery
Low-grade glioma
Intra-axial lesion
Neuronavigation
Awake craniotomy
Limited resources
Intraoperative ultrasound
title Enhancing intra-axial brain surgery in resource-limited settings: a pilot study balancing safety and radicality
title_full Enhancing intra-axial brain surgery in resource-limited settings: a pilot study balancing safety and radicality
title_fullStr Enhancing intra-axial brain surgery in resource-limited settings: a pilot study balancing safety and radicality
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing intra-axial brain surgery in resource-limited settings: a pilot study balancing safety and radicality
title_short Enhancing intra-axial brain surgery in resource-limited settings: a pilot study balancing safety and radicality
title_sort enhancing intra axial brain surgery in resource limited settings a pilot study balancing safety and radicality
topic Low-grade glioma
Intra-axial lesion
Neuronavigation
Awake craniotomy
Limited resources
Intraoperative ultrasound
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-025-00405-w
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedosamaelarossi enhancingintraaxialbrainsurgeryinresourcelimitedsettingsapilotstudybalancingsafetyandradicality
AT mohammedashrafghobashy enhancingintraaxialbrainsurgeryinresourcelimitedsettingsapilotstudybalancingsafetyandradicality
AT hishamanwarabdelrihim enhancingintraaxialbrainsurgeryinresourcelimitedsettingsapilotstudybalancingsafetyandradicality
AT zeiadyoussryibrahemfayed enhancingintraaxialbrainsurgeryinresourcelimitedsettingsapilotstudybalancingsafetyandradicality
AT abdelrahmanheshamelgayar enhancingintraaxialbrainsurgeryinresourcelimitedsettingsapilotstudybalancingsafetyandradicality