Mallard winter use of conservation program and nonprogram lands in Mississippi

Abstract Prior to the 19th century, the Mississippi Alluvial Valley (MAV) was a vast bottomland hardwood forest ecosystem with associated wetlands and intrinsic resources. Conversion for human uses in the 20th century transformed the MAV into an agriculturally dominated system. Since the late 1980s,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph D. Lancaster, Melanie R. Boudreau, Richard M. Kaminski, Garett M. Street, Anne E. Mini, Kevin D. Nelms, J. Brian Davis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-09-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1545
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849221209322946560
author Joseph D. Lancaster
Melanie R. Boudreau
Richard M. Kaminski
Garett M. Street
Anne E. Mini
Kevin D. Nelms
J. Brian Davis
author_facet Joseph D. Lancaster
Melanie R. Boudreau
Richard M. Kaminski
Garett M. Street
Anne E. Mini
Kevin D. Nelms
J. Brian Davis
author_sort Joseph D. Lancaster
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Prior to the 19th century, the Mississippi Alluvial Valley (MAV) was a vast bottomland hardwood forest ecosystem with associated wetlands and intrinsic resources. Conversion for human uses in the 20th century transformed the MAV into an agriculturally dominated system. Since the late 1980s, federal and state incentivized conservation programs for landowners have helped restore wetlands on private lands in the MAV. Given the need to evaluate incentivized private lands in relation to waterfowl use, we used a sample of 241 radiomarked female mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and evaluated their use of private and public lands in the Mississippi portion of the MAV during winters 2010–2015. Our objective was to examine mallard use of public, incentivized private, and non‐incentivized private lands and to evaluate if use changed by time of day and during and after the hunting season. Among all diurnal and nocturnal locations of mallards, 43.3% (n = 3,995) occurred on public lands, 19.5% (n = 1,802) were on incentivized private lands, and 37.2% (n = 3,432) on non‐incentivized private lands. Of mallard locations on incentivized private lands, mallards exhibited greatest use of Wetland Reserve Easements (WRE; 12.4%) and Conservation Reserve Program tracts (CRP; 4.7%). Mallards used public lands more diurnally within hunting seasons and more during hunting seasons than post‐hunting season, which we attributed to the presence of designated sanctuaries that may have provided refuge from hunting and other disturbances. Post‐hunting season, mallards increased their use of incentivized and non‐incentivized private lands, perhaps to exploit seasonal emergent wetland and remnant agricultural foods. Radiomarked mallards used a variety of landcover types across public and private land, reinforcing the importance of habitat complexes for wintering mallards and other dabbling ducks. Conservation program lands, such as CRP and WREs, provide emergent and forested wetlands that complement flooded agricultural lands and natural wetlands in the MAV. When areal availability estimates of incentivized private lands are accessible from government or other partners, we encourage future researchers to investigate selectivity by mallards and other waterfowl of public, incentivized, and non‐incentivized lands.
format Article
id doaj-art-ce3e0db3e0e44140bcde2572e289c6cd
institution Kabale University
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-ce3e0db3e0e44140bcde2572e289c6cd2024-11-17T12:05:36ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402024-09-01483n/an/a10.1002/wsb.1545Mallard winter use of conservation program and nonprogram lands in MississippiJoseph D. Lancaster0Melanie R. Boudreau1Richard M. Kaminski2Garett M. Street3Anne E. Mini4Kevin D. Nelms5J. Brian Davis6Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture Mississippi State University Mississippi State MS 39762 USADepartment of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture Mississippi State University Mississippi State MS 39762 USADepartment of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture Mississippi State University Mississippi State MS 39762 USADepartment of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture Mississippi State University Mississippi State MS 39762 USALower Mississippi Valley Joint Venture, American Bird Conservancy Ridgeland MS 39157 USANatural Resources Conservation Service Greenwood MS 38930 USADepartment of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture Mississippi State University Mississippi State MS 39762 USAAbstract Prior to the 19th century, the Mississippi Alluvial Valley (MAV) was a vast bottomland hardwood forest ecosystem with associated wetlands and intrinsic resources. Conversion for human uses in the 20th century transformed the MAV into an agriculturally dominated system. Since the late 1980s, federal and state incentivized conservation programs for landowners have helped restore wetlands on private lands in the MAV. Given the need to evaluate incentivized private lands in relation to waterfowl use, we used a sample of 241 radiomarked female mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and evaluated their use of private and public lands in the Mississippi portion of the MAV during winters 2010–2015. Our objective was to examine mallard use of public, incentivized private, and non‐incentivized private lands and to evaluate if use changed by time of day and during and after the hunting season. Among all diurnal and nocturnal locations of mallards, 43.3% (n = 3,995) occurred on public lands, 19.5% (n = 1,802) were on incentivized private lands, and 37.2% (n = 3,432) on non‐incentivized private lands. Of mallard locations on incentivized private lands, mallards exhibited greatest use of Wetland Reserve Easements (WRE; 12.4%) and Conservation Reserve Program tracts (CRP; 4.7%). Mallards used public lands more diurnally within hunting seasons and more during hunting seasons than post‐hunting season, which we attributed to the presence of designated sanctuaries that may have provided refuge from hunting and other disturbances. Post‐hunting season, mallards increased their use of incentivized and non‐incentivized private lands, perhaps to exploit seasonal emergent wetland and remnant agricultural foods. Radiomarked mallards used a variety of landcover types across public and private land, reinforcing the importance of habitat complexes for wintering mallards and other dabbling ducks. Conservation program lands, such as CRP and WREs, provide emergent and forested wetlands that complement flooded agricultural lands and natural wetlands in the MAV. When areal availability estimates of incentivized private lands are accessible from government or other partners, we encourage future researchers to investigate selectivity by mallards and other waterfowl of public, incentivized, and non‐incentivized lands.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1545Anas platyrhynchosConservation Reserve ProgrammallardMississippi Alluvial ValleyWetland Reserve Easement
spellingShingle Joseph D. Lancaster
Melanie R. Boudreau
Richard M. Kaminski
Garett M. Street
Anne E. Mini
Kevin D. Nelms
J. Brian Davis
Mallard winter use of conservation program and nonprogram lands in Mississippi
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Anas platyrhynchos
Conservation Reserve Program
mallard
Mississippi Alluvial Valley
Wetland Reserve Easement
title Mallard winter use of conservation program and nonprogram lands in Mississippi
title_full Mallard winter use of conservation program and nonprogram lands in Mississippi
title_fullStr Mallard winter use of conservation program and nonprogram lands in Mississippi
title_full_unstemmed Mallard winter use of conservation program and nonprogram lands in Mississippi
title_short Mallard winter use of conservation program and nonprogram lands in Mississippi
title_sort mallard winter use of conservation program and nonprogram lands in mississippi
topic Anas platyrhynchos
Conservation Reserve Program
mallard
Mississippi Alluvial Valley
Wetland Reserve Easement
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1545
work_keys_str_mv AT josephdlancaster mallardwinteruseofconservationprogramandnonprogramlandsinmississippi
AT melanierboudreau mallardwinteruseofconservationprogramandnonprogramlandsinmississippi
AT richardmkaminski mallardwinteruseofconservationprogramandnonprogramlandsinmississippi
AT garettmstreet mallardwinteruseofconservationprogramandnonprogramlandsinmississippi
AT anneemini mallardwinteruseofconservationprogramandnonprogramlandsinmississippi
AT kevindnelms mallardwinteruseofconservationprogramandnonprogramlandsinmississippi
AT jbriandavis mallardwinteruseofconservationprogramandnonprogramlandsinmississippi