Evapotranspiration Dynamics and Partitioning in a Grassed Vineyard: Ecophysiological and Computational Modeling Approaches

Abstract Plenty of information on evapotranspiration (ET) dynamics and partitioning into nonbiological (evaporation, E) and biological (transpiration, T) components is available in literature. However, in agro‐ecosystems where more than one vegetation group is found, like intercropping or grassed or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Flávio Bastos Campos, Torben Oliver Callesen, Carina Verónica Gonzalez, Giorgio Alberti, Leonardo Montagnani, Massimo Tagliavini, Jacob A. Nelson, Damiano Zanotelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-03-01
Series:Water Resources Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035360
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850211936251150336
author Flávio Bastos Campos
Torben Oliver Callesen
Carina Verónica Gonzalez
Giorgio Alberti
Leonardo Montagnani
Massimo Tagliavini
Jacob A. Nelson
Damiano Zanotelli
author_facet Flávio Bastos Campos
Torben Oliver Callesen
Carina Verónica Gonzalez
Giorgio Alberti
Leonardo Montagnani
Massimo Tagliavini
Jacob A. Nelson
Damiano Zanotelli
author_sort Flávio Bastos Campos
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Plenty of information on evapotranspiration (ET) dynamics and partitioning into nonbiological (evaporation, E) and biological (transpiration, T) components is available in literature. However, in agro‐ecosystems where more than one vegetation group is found, like intercropping or grassed orchards and vineyards, it is of great use to understand the contribution to T due to the single plant type or group of plants. We deployed empirical and modeling methods to study the ecosystem evapotranspiration (ETEC) components in a grassed vineyard in Caldaro (Italy) aiming to assess (a) which process, E or T, had greater influence on ETEC dynamics; (b) which component among grapevines and understorey portion dominated the ETEC; and (c) how rainfall influences ETEC components. A top‐down approach combined the eddy covariance method to estimate ETEC, and the Transpiration Estimation Algorithm method to partition it. A bottom‐up approach integrated the understorey evapotranspiration (ETu) with modeled vines transpiration (Tv(mod)). Measured and modeled fluxes showed high daily variability, consistently with meteorological conditions (vapor pressure deficit, Rn and Tair). The mean daily ETEC integrals were 3.45 and 3.40 mm d−1 (2021 and 2022), being TEC (estimated transpiration fraction of ETEC) the higher contributor (TEC/ETEC of 0.77 and 0.79, same years). From the bottom‐up approach, ETu assessed during ground flux chamber campaigns (0.74–1.65 mm d−1) was lower than Tv(mod). A high agreement (R2 = 0.85) was found between the eddy covariance ET hourly values and ET by summing Tv(mod) and ETu. We concluded that the T process represented major fluxes in the agroecosystem during the warm season. Furthermore, the bottom‐up approach indicated the vines as primary contributors to ecosystem T, particularly noticeable after rainfall, as the understorey T fraction (Tu) increased when the system became drier. This study helps disentangling grapevine contribution to evapotranspiration from adjacent herbaceous vegetation in a vineyard, and emphasizes the dominance of biologically mediated transpiration influenced by meteorological conditions. This novel combination of approaches not only enhances understanding of Mediterranean viticulture but also illuminates broader applications in sparsely vegetated environments, such as agroforestry systems and orchards, advancing ecological management practices.
format Article
id doaj-art-ce2dcc00af534f1b96618e41ec49c58f
institution OA Journals
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Water Resources Research
spelling doaj-art-ce2dcc00af534f1b96618e41ec49c58f2025-08-20T02:09:27ZengWileyWater Resources Research0043-13971944-79732025-03-01613n/an/a10.1029/2023WR035360Evapotranspiration Dynamics and Partitioning in a Grassed Vineyard: Ecophysiological and Computational Modeling ApproachesFlávio Bastos Campos0Torben Oliver Callesen1Carina Verónica Gonzalez2Giorgio Alberti3Leonardo Montagnani4Massimo Tagliavini5Jacob A. Nelson6Damiano Zanotelli7Faculty of Science and Technology Free University of Bolzano Piazza Università 1 Bolzano ItalyFaculty of Science and Technology Free University of Bolzano Piazza Università 1 Bolzano ItalyNational University of Cuyo Mendoza ArgentinaFaculty of Science and Technology Free University of Bolzano Piazza Università 1 Bolzano ItalyFaculty of Science and Technology Free University of Bolzano Piazza Università 1 Bolzano ItalyFaculty of Science and Technology Free University of Bolzano Piazza Università 1 Bolzano ItalyDepartment of Biogeochemical Integration Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry Jena GermanyFaculty of Science and Technology Free University of Bolzano Piazza Università 1 Bolzano ItalyAbstract Plenty of information on evapotranspiration (ET) dynamics and partitioning into nonbiological (evaporation, E) and biological (transpiration, T) components is available in literature. However, in agro‐ecosystems where more than one vegetation group is found, like intercropping or grassed orchards and vineyards, it is of great use to understand the contribution to T due to the single plant type or group of plants. We deployed empirical and modeling methods to study the ecosystem evapotranspiration (ETEC) components in a grassed vineyard in Caldaro (Italy) aiming to assess (a) which process, E or T, had greater influence on ETEC dynamics; (b) which component among grapevines and understorey portion dominated the ETEC; and (c) how rainfall influences ETEC components. A top‐down approach combined the eddy covariance method to estimate ETEC, and the Transpiration Estimation Algorithm method to partition it. A bottom‐up approach integrated the understorey evapotranspiration (ETu) with modeled vines transpiration (Tv(mod)). Measured and modeled fluxes showed high daily variability, consistently with meteorological conditions (vapor pressure deficit, Rn and Tair). The mean daily ETEC integrals were 3.45 and 3.40 mm d−1 (2021 and 2022), being TEC (estimated transpiration fraction of ETEC) the higher contributor (TEC/ETEC of 0.77 and 0.79, same years). From the bottom‐up approach, ETu assessed during ground flux chamber campaigns (0.74–1.65 mm d−1) was lower than Tv(mod). A high agreement (R2 = 0.85) was found between the eddy covariance ET hourly values and ET by summing Tv(mod) and ETu. We concluded that the T process represented major fluxes in the agroecosystem during the warm season. Furthermore, the bottom‐up approach indicated the vines as primary contributors to ecosystem T, particularly noticeable after rainfall, as the understorey T fraction (Tu) increased when the system became drier. This study helps disentangling grapevine contribution to evapotranspiration from adjacent herbaceous vegetation in a vineyard, and emphasizes the dominance of biologically mediated transpiration influenced by meteorological conditions. This novel combination of approaches not only enhances understanding of Mediterranean viticulture but also illuminates broader applications in sparsely vegetated environments, such as agroforestry systems and orchards, advancing ecological management practices.https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035360evapotranspiration partitioningtranspiration estimation algorithmEddy CovarianceT/ETunderstorey ETfluxes after precipitation
spellingShingle Flávio Bastos Campos
Torben Oliver Callesen
Carina Verónica Gonzalez
Giorgio Alberti
Leonardo Montagnani
Massimo Tagliavini
Jacob A. Nelson
Damiano Zanotelli
Evapotranspiration Dynamics and Partitioning in a Grassed Vineyard: Ecophysiological and Computational Modeling Approaches
Water Resources Research
evapotranspiration partitioning
transpiration estimation algorithm
Eddy Covariance
T/ET
understorey ET
fluxes after precipitation
title Evapotranspiration Dynamics and Partitioning in a Grassed Vineyard: Ecophysiological and Computational Modeling Approaches
title_full Evapotranspiration Dynamics and Partitioning in a Grassed Vineyard: Ecophysiological and Computational Modeling Approaches
title_fullStr Evapotranspiration Dynamics and Partitioning in a Grassed Vineyard: Ecophysiological and Computational Modeling Approaches
title_full_unstemmed Evapotranspiration Dynamics and Partitioning in a Grassed Vineyard: Ecophysiological and Computational Modeling Approaches
title_short Evapotranspiration Dynamics and Partitioning in a Grassed Vineyard: Ecophysiological and Computational Modeling Approaches
title_sort evapotranspiration dynamics and partitioning in a grassed vineyard ecophysiological and computational modeling approaches
topic evapotranspiration partitioning
transpiration estimation algorithm
Eddy Covariance
T/ET
understorey ET
fluxes after precipitation
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035360
work_keys_str_mv AT flaviobastoscampos evapotranspirationdynamicsandpartitioninginagrassedvineyardecophysiologicalandcomputationalmodelingapproaches
AT torbenolivercallesen evapotranspirationdynamicsandpartitioninginagrassedvineyardecophysiologicalandcomputationalmodelingapproaches
AT carinaveronicagonzalez evapotranspirationdynamicsandpartitioninginagrassedvineyardecophysiologicalandcomputationalmodelingapproaches
AT giorgioalberti evapotranspirationdynamicsandpartitioninginagrassedvineyardecophysiologicalandcomputationalmodelingapproaches
AT leonardomontagnani evapotranspirationdynamicsandpartitioninginagrassedvineyardecophysiologicalandcomputationalmodelingapproaches
AT massimotagliavini evapotranspirationdynamicsandpartitioninginagrassedvineyardecophysiologicalandcomputationalmodelingapproaches
AT jacobanelson evapotranspirationdynamicsandpartitioninginagrassedvineyardecophysiologicalandcomputationalmodelingapproaches
AT damianozanotelli evapotranspirationdynamicsandpartitioninginagrassedvineyardecophysiologicalandcomputationalmodelingapproaches