The Use of Maxims (al-Qawāʿid al-Uṣūliyyah wa al-Fiqhiyyah) in Legal Argumentation of Sharia Economic Court Decisions in Indonesia

All sharia economic court decisions in Indonesia are supposed to include sharia principles as the basis for adjudicating the case. Therefore, the judges must be able to understand the legal norms of sharia economics. This study aimed to explore how fundamentalistic maxims (al-qawāʿid al-uṣūliyyah) a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammad Taufiki, Rokani Darsyah, Mahmud Ridha
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Fakultas Syariah IAIN Madura 2022-06-01
Series:Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejournal.iainmadura.ac.id/index.php/alihkam/article/view/6070
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849773452625444864
author Muhammad Taufiki
Rokani Darsyah
Mahmud Ridha
author_facet Muhammad Taufiki
Rokani Darsyah
Mahmud Ridha
author_sort Muhammad Taufiki
collection DOAJ
description All sharia economic court decisions in Indonesia are supposed to include sharia principles as the basis for adjudicating the case. Therefore, the judges must be able to understand the legal norms of sharia economics. This study aimed to explore how fundamentalistic maxims (al-qawāʿid al-uṣūliyyah) and jurisprudential maxims (al-qawāʿid al-fiqhiyyah) as parts of sharia economic legal norms or sharia principles were used by judges as legal argumentation in court decisions. We analyzed 384 court decisions categorized as sharia economic cases on the Indonesian Supreme Court website from April 20, 2016, to April 20, 2020, and set them as a universe of cases. Each decision that contained the maxim (qāʿidah) in its legal consideration was selected as relevant case sample and was then analyzed to find how the maxim was used as legal argumentation to respond to a petition and/or demurrer. Then, we found 15 legal maxims from 28 legal argumentations of 14 decisions (3.65% of the universe of cases). In general, the use of those maxims as legal argumentation has already conformed to their conventional usage with a few notes related to specific legal findings (rechtsvinding) in sharia economic cases.
format Article
id doaj-art-cde31fa506194b1797cb2c821646d201
institution DOAJ
issn 1907-591X
2442-3084
language Arabic
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Fakultas Syariah IAIN Madura
record_format Article
series Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial
spelling doaj-art-cde31fa506194b1797cb2c821646d2012025-08-20T03:02:03ZaraFakultas Syariah IAIN MaduraAl-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial1907-591X2442-30842022-06-0117116518810.19105/al-lhkam.v17i1.60706070The Use of Maxims (al-Qawāʿid al-Uṣūliyyah wa al-Fiqhiyyah) in Legal Argumentation of Sharia Economic Court Decisions in IndonesiaMuhammad Taufiki0Rokani Darsyah1Mahmud Ridha2Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, JakartaUniversitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, JakartaUniversitas Islam MadinahAll sharia economic court decisions in Indonesia are supposed to include sharia principles as the basis for adjudicating the case. Therefore, the judges must be able to understand the legal norms of sharia economics. This study aimed to explore how fundamentalistic maxims (al-qawāʿid al-uṣūliyyah) and jurisprudential maxims (al-qawāʿid al-fiqhiyyah) as parts of sharia economic legal norms or sharia principles were used by judges as legal argumentation in court decisions. We analyzed 384 court decisions categorized as sharia economic cases on the Indonesian Supreme Court website from April 20, 2016, to April 20, 2020, and set them as a universe of cases. Each decision that contained the maxim (qāʿidah) in its legal consideration was selected as relevant case sample and was then analyzed to find how the maxim was used as legal argumentation to respond to a petition and/or demurrer. Then, we found 15 legal maxims from 28 legal argumentations of 14 decisions (3.65% of the universe of cases). In general, the use of those maxims as legal argumentation has already conformed to their conventional usage with a few notes related to specific legal findings (rechtsvinding) in sharia economic cases.https://ejournal.iainmadura.ac.id/index.php/alihkam/article/view/6070court decision; sharia economic; legal maxim; al-qawāʿid al-fiqhiyyah; al-qawāʿid al-uṣūliyyah
spellingShingle Muhammad Taufiki
Rokani Darsyah
Mahmud Ridha
The Use of Maxims (al-Qawāʿid al-Uṣūliyyah wa al-Fiqhiyyah) in Legal Argumentation of Sharia Economic Court Decisions in Indonesia
Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial
court decision; sharia economic; legal maxim; al-qawāʿid al-fiqhiyyah; al-qawāʿid al-uṣūliyyah
title The Use of Maxims (al-Qawāʿid al-Uṣūliyyah wa al-Fiqhiyyah) in Legal Argumentation of Sharia Economic Court Decisions in Indonesia
title_full The Use of Maxims (al-Qawāʿid al-Uṣūliyyah wa al-Fiqhiyyah) in Legal Argumentation of Sharia Economic Court Decisions in Indonesia
title_fullStr The Use of Maxims (al-Qawāʿid al-Uṣūliyyah wa al-Fiqhiyyah) in Legal Argumentation of Sharia Economic Court Decisions in Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Maxims (al-Qawāʿid al-Uṣūliyyah wa al-Fiqhiyyah) in Legal Argumentation of Sharia Economic Court Decisions in Indonesia
title_short The Use of Maxims (al-Qawāʿid al-Uṣūliyyah wa al-Fiqhiyyah) in Legal Argumentation of Sharia Economic Court Decisions in Indonesia
title_sort use of maxims al qawaʿid al usuliyyah wa al fiqhiyyah in legal argumentation of sharia economic court decisions in indonesia
topic court decision; sharia economic; legal maxim; al-qawāʿid al-fiqhiyyah; al-qawāʿid al-uṣūliyyah
url https://ejournal.iainmadura.ac.id/index.php/alihkam/article/view/6070
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadtaufiki theuseofmaximsalqawaʿidalusuliyyahwaalfiqhiyyahinlegalargumentationofshariaeconomiccourtdecisionsinindonesia
AT rokanidarsyah theuseofmaximsalqawaʿidalusuliyyahwaalfiqhiyyahinlegalargumentationofshariaeconomiccourtdecisionsinindonesia
AT mahmudridha theuseofmaximsalqawaʿidalusuliyyahwaalfiqhiyyahinlegalargumentationofshariaeconomiccourtdecisionsinindonesia
AT muhammadtaufiki useofmaximsalqawaʿidalusuliyyahwaalfiqhiyyahinlegalargumentationofshariaeconomiccourtdecisionsinindonesia
AT rokanidarsyah useofmaximsalqawaʿidalusuliyyahwaalfiqhiyyahinlegalargumentationofshariaeconomiccourtdecisionsinindonesia
AT mahmudridha useofmaximsalqawaʿidalusuliyyahwaalfiqhiyyahinlegalargumentationofshariaeconomiccourtdecisionsinindonesia