Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews

Objectives Occupational injuries and diseases are a huge public health problem and cause extensive suffering and loss of productivity. Nevertheless, many occupational health and safety (OHS) guidelines are still not based on the best available evidence. In the last decade, numerous systematic review...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Birgit Teufer, Irma Klerings, Lisa Affengruber, Agnes Ebenberger, Christina Kien, Monika Szelag, Ludwig Grillich, Ursula Griebler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/12/e032528.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846147845045878784
author Birgit Teufer
Irma Klerings
Lisa Affengruber
Agnes Ebenberger
Christina Kien
Monika Szelag
Ludwig Grillich
Ursula Griebler
author_facet Birgit Teufer
Irma Klerings
Lisa Affengruber
Agnes Ebenberger
Christina Kien
Monika Szelag
Ludwig Grillich
Ursula Griebler
author_sort Birgit Teufer
collection DOAJ
description Objectives Occupational injuries and diseases are a huge public health problem and cause extensive suffering and loss of productivity. Nevertheless, many occupational health and safety (OHS) guidelines are still not based on the best available evidence. In the last decade, numerous systematic reviews on behavioural, relational and mixed interventions to reduce occupational injuries and diseases have been carried out, but a comprehensive synopsis is yet missing. The aim of this overview of reviews is to provide a comprehensive basis to inform evidence-based decision-making about interventions in the field of OHS.Methods We conducted an overview of reviews. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), the Cochrane Library (Wiley), epistemonikos.org and Scopus (Elsevier) for relevant systematic reviews published between January 2008 and June 2018. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full-text publications and determined the risk of bias of the included systematic reviews with the ROBIS (Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews) tool.Results We screened 2287 abstracts and 200 full-texts for eligibility. Finally, we included 25 systematic reviews with a low risk of bias for data synthesis and analysis. We identified systematic reviews on the prevention of occupational injuries, musculoskeletal, skin and lung diseases, occupational hearing impairment and interventions without specific target diseases. Several interventions led to consistently positive results on individual diseases; other interventions did not show any effects, or the studies are contradictory. We provide detailed results on all included interventions.Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive overview of behavioural, relational and mixed interventions and their effectiveness in preventing occupational injuries and diseases. It provides policymakers with an important basis for making evidence-based decisions on interventions in this field.PROSPERO registration number CRD42018100341
format Article
id doaj-art-cdcb71ae3c6c45a8b509e2b710312ed5
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-cdcb71ae3c6c45a8b509e2b710312ed52024-12-01T12:25:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552019-12-0191210.1136/bmjopen-2019-032528Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviewsBirgit Teufer0Irma Klerings1Lisa Affengruber2Agnes Ebenberger3Christina Kien4Monika Szelag5Ludwig Grillich6Ursula Griebler7Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Krems, AustriaDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Krems, AustriaDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Krems, AustriaDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Krems, AustriaDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Krems, AustriaDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Krems, AustriaDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austriasenior research associateObjectives Occupational injuries and diseases are a huge public health problem and cause extensive suffering and loss of productivity. Nevertheless, many occupational health and safety (OHS) guidelines are still not based on the best available evidence. In the last decade, numerous systematic reviews on behavioural, relational and mixed interventions to reduce occupational injuries and diseases have been carried out, but a comprehensive synopsis is yet missing. The aim of this overview of reviews is to provide a comprehensive basis to inform evidence-based decision-making about interventions in the field of OHS.Methods We conducted an overview of reviews. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), the Cochrane Library (Wiley), epistemonikos.org and Scopus (Elsevier) for relevant systematic reviews published between January 2008 and June 2018. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full-text publications and determined the risk of bias of the included systematic reviews with the ROBIS (Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews) tool.Results We screened 2287 abstracts and 200 full-texts for eligibility. Finally, we included 25 systematic reviews with a low risk of bias for data synthesis and analysis. We identified systematic reviews on the prevention of occupational injuries, musculoskeletal, skin and lung diseases, occupational hearing impairment and interventions without specific target diseases. Several interventions led to consistently positive results on individual diseases; other interventions did not show any effects, or the studies are contradictory. We provide detailed results on all included interventions.Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive overview of behavioural, relational and mixed interventions and their effectiveness in preventing occupational injuries and diseases. It provides policymakers with an important basis for making evidence-based decisions on interventions in this field.PROSPERO registration number CRD42018100341https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/12/e032528.full
spellingShingle Birgit Teufer
Irma Klerings
Lisa Affengruber
Agnes Ebenberger
Christina Kien
Monika Szelag
Ludwig Grillich
Ursula Griebler
Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews
BMJ Open
title Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews
title_full Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews
title_fullStr Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews
title_full_unstemmed Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews
title_short Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews
title_sort evidence based occupational health and safety interventions a comprehensive overview of reviews
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/12/e032528.full
work_keys_str_mv AT birgitteufer evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews
AT irmaklerings evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews
AT lisaaffengruber evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews
AT agnesebenberger evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews
AT christinakien evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews
AT monikaszelag evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews
AT ludwiggrillich evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews
AT ursulagriebler evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews