First step in implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy for prevention of ovarian cancer: Current care and its determinants
Abstract Introduction Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) refers to additional removal of the fallopian tubes during abdominal surgery performed for another medical indication, as prevention for ovarian cancer. As OS has been inconsistently implemented, its clinical practice varies worldwide. To reduce...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2023-03-01
|
| Series: | Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14507 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849422712573788160 |
|---|---|
| author | Malou E. Gelderblom Veerle Jaspers Reinier P. Akkermans Brigitte Slangen Angele L. M. Oei Alexandra A. vanGinkel Huy Ngo Joanna IntHout Rosella P. M. G. Hermens Joanne A. deHullu Jurgen M. J. Piek |
| author_facet | Malou E. Gelderblom Veerle Jaspers Reinier P. Akkermans Brigitte Slangen Angele L. M. Oei Alexandra A. vanGinkel Huy Ngo Joanna IntHout Rosella P. M. G. Hermens Joanne A. deHullu Jurgen M. J. Piek |
| author_sort | Malou E. Gelderblom |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Introduction Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) refers to additional removal of the fallopian tubes during abdominal surgery performed for another medical indication, as prevention for ovarian cancer. As OS has been inconsistently implemented, its clinical practice varies worldwide. To reduce this variation, insight is required into current clinical practice and its determinants. Therefore, the study aim was to determine the implementation of counseling and performance of OS between 2015 and 2018, and its patient, surgical, physician, and hospital characteristics. Material and methods Retrospective study using electronic medical records from six different Dutch hospitals: two academic, two large teaching, and two non‐teaching hospitals. Patients were considered eligible for OS if they underwent elective non‐obstetric abdominal surgery for a gynecological indication from January 2015 through December 2018. Primary outcomes were uptake of counseling and performance of OS. Multilevel multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify characteristics associated with OS. Results A total of 3214 patients underwent elective non‐obstetric abdominal surgery for a gynecological indication and were eligible for OS. Counseling on OS increased significantly from 2.9% in 2015 to 29.4% in 2018. In this period, 440 patients were counseled on OS, of which 95.9% chose OS. Performance of OS increased significantly from 6.9% in 2015 to 44.5% in 2018. Counseling for and performance of OS were more likely in patients who had surgery by laparoscopic approach, were counseled by a gynecological resident, or had more than three contact moments before surgery. Additionally, OS was less likely in patients who had vaginal surgery. Conclusions Although the uptake of OS increased from 2015 to 2018, the majority of patients who were eligible for OS were not counseled and did not undergo OS. Its clinical practice varies on patient, surgery, and physician characteristics. Therefore, an implementation strategy tailored to associated determinants is recommended. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-cdbf370358f548ef97027ca99bc75c87 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0001-6349 1600-0412 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica |
| spelling | doaj-art-cdbf370358f548ef97027ca99bc75c872025-08-20T03:30:57ZengWileyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica0001-63491600-04122023-03-01102325726910.1111/aogs.14507First step in implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy for prevention of ovarian cancer: Current care and its determinantsMalou E. Gelderblom0Veerle Jaspers1Reinier P. Akkermans2Brigitte Slangen3Angele L. M. Oei4Alexandra A. vanGinkel5Huy Ngo6Joanna IntHout7Rosella P. M. G. Hermens8Joanne A. deHullu9Jurgen M. J. Piek10Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The NetherlandsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Catharina Cancer Institute Catharina Hospital Eindhoven The NetherlandsRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of IQ health care Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The NetherlandsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The NetherlandsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Bernhoven Hospital Uden The NetherlandsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem The NetherlandsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Elkerliek Hospital Helmond The NetherlandsDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The NetherlandsRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of IQ health care Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The NetherlandsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The NetherlandsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Catharina Cancer Institute Catharina Hospital Eindhoven The NetherlandsAbstract Introduction Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) refers to additional removal of the fallopian tubes during abdominal surgery performed for another medical indication, as prevention for ovarian cancer. As OS has been inconsistently implemented, its clinical practice varies worldwide. To reduce this variation, insight is required into current clinical practice and its determinants. Therefore, the study aim was to determine the implementation of counseling and performance of OS between 2015 and 2018, and its patient, surgical, physician, and hospital characteristics. Material and methods Retrospective study using electronic medical records from six different Dutch hospitals: two academic, two large teaching, and two non‐teaching hospitals. Patients were considered eligible for OS if they underwent elective non‐obstetric abdominal surgery for a gynecological indication from January 2015 through December 2018. Primary outcomes were uptake of counseling and performance of OS. Multilevel multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify characteristics associated with OS. Results A total of 3214 patients underwent elective non‐obstetric abdominal surgery for a gynecological indication and were eligible for OS. Counseling on OS increased significantly from 2.9% in 2015 to 29.4% in 2018. In this period, 440 patients were counseled on OS, of which 95.9% chose OS. Performance of OS increased significantly from 6.9% in 2015 to 44.5% in 2018. Counseling for and performance of OS were more likely in patients who had surgery by laparoscopic approach, were counseled by a gynecological resident, or had more than three contact moments before surgery. Additionally, OS was less likely in patients who had vaginal surgery. Conclusions Although the uptake of OS increased from 2015 to 2018, the majority of patients who were eligible for OS were not counseled and did not undergo OS. Its clinical practice varies on patient, surgery, and physician characteristics. Therefore, an implementation strategy tailored to associated determinants is recommended.https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14507counselingfallopian tubeopportunistic salpingectomyovarian cancerperformanceprevention |
| spellingShingle | Malou E. Gelderblom Veerle Jaspers Reinier P. Akkermans Brigitte Slangen Angele L. M. Oei Alexandra A. vanGinkel Huy Ngo Joanna IntHout Rosella P. M. G. Hermens Joanne A. deHullu Jurgen M. J. Piek First step in implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy for prevention of ovarian cancer: Current care and its determinants Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica counseling fallopian tube opportunistic salpingectomy ovarian cancer performance prevention |
| title | First step in implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy for prevention of ovarian cancer: Current care and its determinants |
| title_full | First step in implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy for prevention of ovarian cancer: Current care and its determinants |
| title_fullStr | First step in implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy for prevention of ovarian cancer: Current care and its determinants |
| title_full_unstemmed | First step in implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy for prevention of ovarian cancer: Current care and its determinants |
| title_short | First step in implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy for prevention of ovarian cancer: Current care and its determinants |
| title_sort | first step in implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy for prevention of ovarian cancer current care and its determinants |
| topic | counseling fallopian tube opportunistic salpingectomy ovarian cancer performance prevention |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14507 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT malouegelderblom firststepinimplementationofopportunisticsalpingectomyforpreventionofovariancancercurrentcareanditsdeterminants AT veerlejaspers firststepinimplementationofopportunisticsalpingectomyforpreventionofovariancancercurrentcareanditsdeterminants AT reinierpakkermans firststepinimplementationofopportunisticsalpingectomyforpreventionofovariancancercurrentcareanditsdeterminants AT brigitteslangen firststepinimplementationofopportunisticsalpingectomyforpreventionofovariancancercurrentcareanditsdeterminants AT angelelmoei firststepinimplementationofopportunisticsalpingectomyforpreventionofovariancancercurrentcareanditsdeterminants AT alexandraavanginkel firststepinimplementationofopportunisticsalpingectomyforpreventionofovariancancercurrentcareanditsdeterminants AT huyngo firststepinimplementationofopportunisticsalpingectomyforpreventionofovariancancercurrentcareanditsdeterminants AT joannainthout firststepinimplementationofopportunisticsalpingectomyforpreventionofovariancancercurrentcareanditsdeterminants AT rosellapmghermens firststepinimplementationofopportunisticsalpingectomyforpreventionofovariancancercurrentcareanditsdeterminants AT joanneadehullu firststepinimplementationofopportunisticsalpingectomyforpreventionofovariancancercurrentcareanditsdeterminants AT jurgenmjpiek firststepinimplementationofopportunisticsalpingectomyforpreventionofovariancancercurrentcareanditsdeterminants |