How Were Translated: Perspectives on the Political and Literary Fields
The Three-Body Trilogy , published in English, is arguably the best-selling Chinese literature, with the most attention garnered from the English-language media. Literature is viewed as a symbolic product, as a nation’s literary works are naturally seen as a literary prestige or reserving the status...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | SAGE Open |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241304847 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850257043257032704 |
|---|---|
| author | Gaosheng Deng Sang Seong Goh |
| author_facet | Gaosheng Deng Sang Seong Goh |
| author_sort | Gaosheng Deng |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The Three-Body Trilogy , published in English, is arguably the best-selling Chinese literature, with the most attention garnered from the English-language media. Literature is viewed as a symbolic product, as a nation’s literary works are naturally seen as a literary prestige or reserving the status of a sacred classic. While some literary fields are considered dominant, others ending up in being dominated. Thus, the conflict between the dominant and dominated in the field of literature serves as the field’s fundamental driving force. Such competition may derive from political influence, financial gain, social standing, or even the cultural standing of the field the participants occupy. By adopting the keyword “ The Three-Body Trilogy ,” this study searched the BCC and NOW corpora. It was found that the Classic China International Publishing Project, Silk Road Literary Project, Ken Liu, Tor Books all provided varying degrees of support for the translation and dissemination of The Three-Body Trilogy , which jointly form the field and translation context for it to move from the dominated literary field to the dominant literary field. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-cdb22480c18c4e58bf190ee3f0215086 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2158-2440 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | SAGE Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | SAGE Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-cdb22480c18c4e58bf190ee3f02150862025-08-20T01:56:31ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402024-12-011410.1177/21582440241304847How Were Translated: Perspectives on the Political and Literary FieldsGaosheng Deng0Sang Seong Goh1Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, ChinaUniversiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, MalaysiaThe Three-Body Trilogy , published in English, is arguably the best-selling Chinese literature, with the most attention garnered from the English-language media. Literature is viewed as a symbolic product, as a nation’s literary works are naturally seen as a literary prestige or reserving the status of a sacred classic. While some literary fields are considered dominant, others ending up in being dominated. Thus, the conflict between the dominant and dominated in the field of literature serves as the field’s fundamental driving force. Such competition may derive from political influence, financial gain, social standing, or even the cultural standing of the field the participants occupy. By adopting the keyword “ The Three-Body Trilogy ,” this study searched the BCC and NOW corpora. It was found that the Classic China International Publishing Project, Silk Road Literary Project, Ken Liu, Tor Books all provided varying degrees of support for the translation and dissemination of The Three-Body Trilogy , which jointly form the field and translation context for it to move from the dominated literary field to the dominant literary field.https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241304847 |
| spellingShingle | Gaosheng Deng Sang Seong Goh How Were Translated: Perspectives on the Political and Literary Fields SAGE Open |
| title | How Were Translated: Perspectives on the Political and Literary Fields |
| title_full | How Were Translated: Perspectives on the Political and Literary Fields |
| title_fullStr | How Were Translated: Perspectives on the Political and Literary Fields |
| title_full_unstemmed | How Were Translated: Perspectives on the Political and Literary Fields |
| title_short | How Were Translated: Perspectives on the Political and Literary Fields |
| title_sort | how were translated perspectives on the political and literary fields |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241304847 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gaoshengdeng howweretranslatedperspectivesonthepoliticalandliteraryfields AT sangseonggoh howweretranslatedperspectivesonthepoliticalandliteraryfields |