Analysis of Bone Density and Bone Morphometry by Periapical Radiographs in Dental Implant Osseointegration Process

Objective. This research aimed to analyze the differences in bone density and bone morphometry by periapical implant radiography in the dental implant osseointegration stages. Methods. This experimental research uses 12 periapical radiographs of tibial bones from a New Zealand white rabbit (Oryctola...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ratih Trikusumadewi Lubis, Azhari Azhari, Farina Pramanik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/4763961
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832548015100919808
author Ratih Trikusumadewi Lubis
Azhari Azhari
Farina Pramanik
author_facet Ratih Trikusumadewi Lubis
Azhari Azhari
Farina Pramanik
author_sort Ratih Trikusumadewi Lubis
collection DOAJ
description Objective. This research aimed to analyze the differences in bone density and bone morphometry by periapical implant radiography in the dental implant osseointegration stages. Methods. This experimental research uses 12 periapical radiographs of tibial bones from a New Zealand white rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). The analysis was performed on day 3, 14, and 28 of the osseointegration stages with density, trabecular thickness (Tb.Th.), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp.), and trabecular number (Tb.N.) as parameters. The implant used is a titanium alloy and coated by SA (sunblasted with alumina acid) of 4 mm in diameter and 7 mm in length. The radiographic assessment of the osseointegration process is obtained with the region of interest (ROI) segmentation results. Additionally, each ROI was analyzed for bone density and morphometry using the open-source ImageJ software with the BoneJ plugin. The significant difference was evaluated by analysis of variance (F-test) with p<0.05 and nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test with p<0.05. Results. Analysis of the osseointegration images of dental implants at day 3, 14, and 28 with the periapical X-ray modality shows significant differences (p<0.05) in the parameters measuring density and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th.). In the variables of trabecular separation (Tb.Sp.) and number (Tb.N.) (p>0.05), there is no significant difference. Conclusion. Based on the results, density and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th.) showed a significant difference between healing times. However, trabecular separation (Tb.Sp.) and trabecular number (Tb.N.) showed no difference in healing time.
format Article
id doaj-art-cd96b5088ca1488bb1f2b2bbffd785b7
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8736
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Dentistry
spelling doaj-art-cd96b5088ca1488bb1f2b2bbffd785b72025-02-03T06:42:40ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87362023-01-01202310.1155/2023/4763961Analysis of Bone Density and Bone Morphometry by Periapical Radiographs in Dental Implant Osseointegration ProcessRatih Trikusumadewi Lubis0Azhari Azhari1Farina Pramanik2Dentomaxillofacial Radiology Specialist ProgramDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial RadiologyDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial RadiologyObjective. This research aimed to analyze the differences in bone density and bone morphometry by periapical implant radiography in the dental implant osseointegration stages. Methods. This experimental research uses 12 periapical radiographs of tibial bones from a New Zealand white rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). The analysis was performed on day 3, 14, and 28 of the osseointegration stages with density, trabecular thickness (Tb.Th.), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp.), and trabecular number (Tb.N.) as parameters. The implant used is a titanium alloy and coated by SA (sunblasted with alumina acid) of 4 mm in diameter and 7 mm in length. The radiographic assessment of the osseointegration process is obtained with the region of interest (ROI) segmentation results. Additionally, each ROI was analyzed for bone density and morphometry using the open-source ImageJ software with the BoneJ plugin. The significant difference was evaluated by analysis of variance (F-test) with p<0.05 and nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test with p<0.05. Results. Analysis of the osseointegration images of dental implants at day 3, 14, and 28 with the periapical X-ray modality shows significant differences (p<0.05) in the parameters measuring density and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th.). In the variables of trabecular separation (Tb.Sp.) and number (Tb.N.) (p>0.05), there is no significant difference. Conclusion. Based on the results, density and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th.) showed a significant difference between healing times. However, trabecular separation (Tb.Sp.) and trabecular number (Tb.N.) showed no difference in healing time.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/4763961
spellingShingle Ratih Trikusumadewi Lubis
Azhari Azhari
Farina Pramanik
Analysis of Bone Density and Bone Morphometry by Periapical Radiographs in Dental Implant Osseointegration Process
International Journal of Dentistry
title Analysis of Bone Density and Bone Morphometry by Periapical Radiographs in Dental Implant Osseointegration Process
title_full Analysis of Bone Density and Bone Morphometry by Periapical Radiographs in Dental Implant Osseointegration Process
title_fullStr Analysis of Bone Density and Bone Morphometry by Periapical Radiographs in Dental Implant Osseointegration Process
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Bone Density and Bone Morphometry by Periapical Radiographs in Dental Implant Osseointegration Process
title_short Analysis of Bone Density and Bone Morphometry by Periapical Radiographs in Dental Implant Osseointegration Process
title_sort analysis of bone density and bone morphometry by periapical radiographs in dental implant osseointegration process
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/4763961
work_keys_str_mv AT ratihtrikusumadewilubis analysisofbonedensityandbonemorphometrybyperiapicalradiographsindentalimplantosseointegrationprocess
AT azhariazhari analysisofbonedensityandbonemorphometrybyperiapicalradiographsindentalimplantosseointegrationprocess
AT farinapramanik analysisofbonedensityandbonemorphometrybyperiapicalradiographsindentalimplantosseointegrationprocess