Students’ Perceptions of AI Digital Assistants (AIDAs): Should Institutions Invest in Their Own AIDAs?

This mixed methods study explores 315 distance learning students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence digital assistants (AIDAs) over an 11-month period in three distinct studies. The research investigates student perspectives on both a publicly available AI digital assistant (p-AIDA), such as Ch...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bart Rienties, Felipe Tessarolo, Emily Coughlan, Tim Coughlan, John Domingue
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-04-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/8/4279
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850155990901587968
author Bart Rienties
Felipe Tessarolo
Emily Coughlan
Tim Coughlan
John Domingue
author_facet Bart Rienties
Felipe Tessarolo
Emily Coughlan
Tim Coughlan
John Domingue
author_sort Bart Rienties
collection DOAJ
description This mixed methods study explores 315 distance learning students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence digital assistants (AIDAs) over an 11-month period in three distinct studies. The research investigates student perspectives on both a publicly available AI digital assistant (p-AIDA), such as ChatGPT, and a potential institutionally developed AI digital assistant (i-AIDA). Findings indicate that students highly valued 24/7 immediate academic feedback and the personalisation of the i-AIDA, and these perspectives remained largely stable across the three studies. However, concerns about academic integrity, data privacy, and ethical implications persisted across the studies. A cluster analysis identified three distinct student groups of highly critical, supportive, and keenly supportive learners, with key differences based on prior GenAI experience, educational background, and age. This study underscores both the potential and challenges of developing institutional AI solutions to enhance student learning while addressing privacy and ethical concerns.
format Article
id doaj-art-cd95c844d3f842aab646268e4a24ac0e
institution OA Journals
issn 2076-3417
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-cd95c844d3f842aab646268e4a24ac0e2025-08-20T02:24:43ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172025-04-01158427910.3390/app15084279Students’ Perceptions of AI Digital Assistants (AIDAs): Should Institutions Invest in Their Own AIDAs?Bart Rienties0Felipe Tessarolo1Emily Coughlan2Tim Coughlan3John Domingue4Institute of Educational Technology, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UKInstitute of Educational Technology, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UKInstitute of Educational Technology, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UKInstitute of Educational Technology, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UKKnowledge Media Institute, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UKThis mixed methods study explores 315 distance learning students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence digital assistants (AIDAs) over an 11-month period in three distinct studies. The research investigates student perspectives on both a publicly available AI digital assistant (p-AIDA), such as ChatGPT, and a potential institutionally developed AI digital assistant (i-AIDA). Findings indicate that students highly valued 24/7 immediate academic feedback and the personalisation of the i-AIDA, and these perspectives remained largely stable across the three studies. However, concerns about academic integrity, data privacy, and ethical implications persisted across the studies. A cluster analysis identified three distinct student groups of highly critical, supportive, and keenly supportive learners, with key differences based on prior GenAI experience, educational background, and age. This study underscores both the potential and challenges of developing institutional AI solutions to enhance student learning while addressing privacy and ethical concerns.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/8/4279artificial intelligencegenerative AIdigital assistantpublic vs. institutional AIstudent expectationsdistance learning
spellingShingle Bart Rienties
Felipe Tessarolo
Emily Coughlan
Tim Coughlan
John Domingue
Students’ Perceptions of AI Digital Assistants (AIDAs): Should Institutions Invest in Their Own AIDAs?
Applied Sciences
artificial intelligence
generative AI
digital assistant
public vs. institutional AI
student expectations
distance learning
title Students’ Perceptions of AI Digital Assistants (AIDAs): Should Institutions Invest in Their Own AIDAs?
title_full Students’ Perceptions of AI Digital Assistants (AIDAs): Should Institutions Invest in Their Own AIDAs?
title_fullStr Students’ Perceptions of AI Digital Assistants (AIDAs): Should Institutions Invest in Their Own AIDAs?
title_full_unstemmed Students’ Perceptions of AI Digital Assistants (AIDAs): Should Institutions Invest in Their Own AIDAs?
title_short Students’ Perceptions of AI Digital Assistants (AIDAs): Should Institutions Invest in Their Own AIDAs?
title_sort students perceptions of ai digital assistants aidas should institutions invest in their own aidas
topic artificial intelligence
generative AI
digital assistant
public vs. institutional AI
student expectations
distance learning
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/8/4279
work_keys_str_mv AT bartrienties studentsperceptionsofaidigitalassistantsaidasshouldinstitutionsinvestintheirownaidas
AT felipetessarolo studentsperceptionsofaidigitalassistantsaidasshouldinstitutionsinvestintheirownaidas
AT emilycoughlan studentsperceptionsofaidigitalassistantsaidasshouldinstitutionsinvestintheirownaidas
AT timcoughlan studentsperceptionsofaidigitalassistantsaidasshouldinstitutionsinvestintheirownaidas
AT johndomingue studentsperceptionsofaidigitalassistantsaidasshouldinstitutionsinvestintheirownaidas