Effectiveness of AI-generated orthodontic treatment plans compared to expert orthodontist recommendations: a cross-sectional pilot study

ABSTRACT Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a prominent focus in orthodontics. Objective: This study aimed to compare treatment plans generated by AI platforms (ChatGPT, Google Bard, Microsoft Bing) with those formulated by an experienced orthodontist. Methods: This observation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Orlando Motohiro TANAKA, Gil Guilherme GASPARELLO, Sergio Luiz MOTA-JÚNIOR, Mohamad Jamal BARK, Jacqueline de Almeida Antunes ROZYSCKI, Rafael Bordin WOLANSKI
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dental Press Editora 2025-03-01
Series:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512025000100301&tlng=en
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850048621373816832
author Orlando Motohiro TANAKA
Gil Guilherme GASPARELLO
Sergio Luiz MOTA-JÚNIOR
Mohamad Jamal BARK
Jacqueline de Almeida Antunes ROZYSCKI
Rafael Bordin WOLANSKI
author_facet Orlando Motohiro TANAKA
Gil Guilherme GASPARELLO
Sergio Luiz MOTA-JÚNIOR
Mohamad Jamal BARK
Jacqueline de Almeida Antunes ROZYSCKI
Rafael Bordin WOLANSKI
author_sort Orlando Motohiro TANAKA
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a prominent focus in orthodontics. Objective: This study aimed to compare treatment plans generated by AI platforms (ChatGPT, Google Bard, Microsoft Bing) with those formulated by an experienced orthodontist. Methods: This observational cross-sectional pilot study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of AI-powered platforms in creating orthodontic treatment plans, using a clinical case treated by an experienced orthodontist as a benchmark. A clinical case was selected, and after obtaining informed consent, detailed case information was presented to ChatGPT-3.5, Microsoft Bing Copilot, and Google Bard Gemini for treatment planning. The AI-generated plans, along with the orthodontist’s plan, were evaluated by 34 orthodontists using a questionnaire that included Likert scale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) items. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the levels of agreement with the proposed treatment plans. Results: Orthodontists exhibited significantly higher levels of agreement with treatment plans proposed by the orthodontist, compared to those generated by AIs platforms (p < 0.001). Both Likert scale and VAS scores indicated increased confidence in the orthodontist’s expertise in formulating treatment plans. No significant differences were found among the AI platforms, though Google Bard received the lowest mean scores. Conclusions: Orthodontists demonstrated a higher level of acceptance of treatment plans formulated by human counterparts over those generated by AI platforms. While AI offers significant contributions, the clinical judgment and experience of orthodontists remain essential for thorough and effective treatment planning in orthodontics.
format Article
id doaj-art-cd85f90bca1b497d8bb27230fc4664e8
institution DOAJ
issn 2177-6709
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Dental Press Editora
record_format Article
series Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
spelling doaj-art-cd85f90bca1b497d8bb27230fc4664e82025-08-20T02:53:54ZengDental Press EditoraDental Press Journal of Orthodontics2177-67092025-03-0130110.1590/2177-6709.30.1.e2524186.oarEffectiveness of AI-generated orthodontic treatment plans compared to expert orthodontist recommendations: a cross-sectional pilot studyOrlando Motohiro TANAKAhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1052-7872Gil Guilherme GASPARELLOhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8955-6448Sergio Luiz MOTA-JÚNIORhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3601-8264Mohamad Jamal BARKhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9862-0894Jacqueline de Almeida Antunes ROZYSCKIhttps://orcid.org/0009-0001-3216-0426Rafael Bordin WOLANSKIhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3273-5584ABSTRACT Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a prominent focus in orthodontics. Objective: This study aimed to compare treatment plans generated by AI platforms (ChatGPT, Google Bard, Microsoft Bing) with those formulated by an experienced orthodontist. Methods: This observational cross-sectional pilot study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of AI-powered platforms in creating orthodontic treatment plans, using a clinical case treated by an experienced orthodontist as a benchmark. A clinical case was selected, and after obtaining informed consent, detailed case information was presented to ChatGPT-3.5, Microsoft Bing Copilot, and Google Bard Gemini for treatment planning. The AI-generated plans, along with the orthodontist’s plan, were evaluated by 34 orthodontists using a questionnaire that included Likert scale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) items. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the levels of agreement with the proposed treatment plans. Results: Orthodontists exhibited significantly higher levels of agreement with treatment plans proposed by the orthodontist, compared to those generated by AIs platforms (p < 0.001). Both Likert scale and VAS scores indicated increased confidence in the orthodontist’s expertise in formulating treatment plans. No significant differences were found among the AI platforms, though Google Bard received the lowest mean scores. Conclusions: Orthodontists demonstrated a higher level of acceptance of treatment plans formulated by human counterparts over those generated by AI platforms. While AI offers significant contributions, the clinical judgment and experience of orthodontists remain essential for thorough and effective treatment planning in orthodontics.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512025000100301&tlng=enArtificial intelligenceTreatment planDiagnosisOrthodontics
spellingShingle Orlando Motohiro TANAKA
Gil Guilherme GASPARELLO
Sergio Luiz MOTA-JÚNIOR
Mohamad Jamal BARK
Jacqueline de Almeida Antunes ROZYSCKI
Rafael Bordin WOLANSKI
Effectiveness of AI-generated orthodontic treatment plans compared to expert orthodontist recommendations: a cross-sectional pilot study
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Artificial intelligence
Treatment plan
Diagnosis
Orthodontics
title Effectiveness of AI-generated orthodontic treatment plans compared to expert orthodontist recommendations: a cross-sectional pilot study
title_full Effectiveness of AI-generated orthodontic treatment plans compared to expert orthodontist recommendations: a cross-sectional pilot study
title_fullStr Effectiveness of AI-generated orthodontic treatment plans compared to expert orthodontist recommendations: a cross-sectional pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of AI-generated orthodontic treatment plans compared to expert orthodontist recommendations: a cross-sectional pilot study
title_short Effectiveness of AI-generated orthodontic treatment plans compared to expert orthodontist recommendations: a cross-sectional pilot study
title_sort effectiveness of ai generated orthodontic treatment plans compared to expert orthodontist recommendations a cross sectional pilot study
topic Artificial intelligence
Treatment plan
Diagnosis
Orthodontics
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512025000100301&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT orlandomotohirotanaka effectivenessofaigeneratedorthodontictreatmentplanscomparedtoexpertorthodontistrecommendationsacrosssectionalpilotstudy
AT gilguilhermegasparello effectivenessofaigeneratedorthodontictreatmentplanscomparedtoexpertorthodontistrecommendationsacrosssectionalpilotstudy
AT sergioluizmotajunior effectivenessofaigeneratedorthodontictreatmentplanscomparedtoexpertorthodontistrecommendationsacrosssectionalpilotstudy
AT mohamadjamalbark effectivenessofaigeneratedorthodontictreatmentplanscomparedtoexpertorthodontistrecommendationsacrosssectionalpilotstudy
AT jacquelinedealmeidaantunesrozyscki effectivenessofaigeneratedorthodontictreatmentplanscomparedtoexpertorthodontistrecommendationsacrosssectionalpilotstudy
AT rafaelbordinwolanski effectivenessofaigeneratedorthodontictreatmentplanscomparedtoexpertorthodontistrecommendationsacrosssectionalpilotstudy