Decellularized and Engineered Tendons as Biological Substitutes: A Critical Review

Tendon ruptures are a great burden in clinics. Finding a proper graft material as a substitute for tendon repair is one of the main challenges in orthopaedics, for which the requirement of a biological scaffold would be different for each clinical application. Among biological scaffolds, the use of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arianna B. Lovati, Marta Bottagisio, Matteo Moretti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Stem Cells International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7276150
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850173283057532928
author Arianna B. Lovati
Marta Bottagisio
Matteo Moretti
author_facet Arianna B. Lovati
Marta Bottagisio
Matteo Moretti
author_sort Arianna B. Lovati
collection DOAJ
description Tendon ruptures are a great burden in clinics. Finding a proper graft material as a substitute for tendon repair is one of the main challenges in orthopaedics, for which the requirement of a biological scaffold would be different for each clinical application. Among biological scaffolds, the use of decellularized tendon-derived matrix increasingly represents an interesting approach to treat tendon ruptures. We analyzed in vitro and in vivo studies focused on the development of efficient protocols for the decellularization and for the cell reseeding of the tendon matrix to obtain medical devices for tendon substitution. Our review considered also the proper tendon source and preclinical animal models with the aim of entering into clinical trials. The results highlight a wide panorama in terms of allogenic or xenogeneic tendon sources, specimen dimensions, physical or chemical decellularization techniques, and the cell type variety for reseeding from terminally differentiated to undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells and their static or dynamic culture employed to generate implantable constructs tested in different animal models. We try to identify the most efficient approach to achieve an optimal biological scaffold for biomechanics and intrinsic properties, resembling the native tendon and being applicable in clinics in the near future, with particular attention to the Achilles tendon substitution.
format Article
id doaj-art-cd7a5347392e471dae4438a2cd8aa2df
institution OA Journals
issn 1687-966X
1687-9678
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Stem Cells International
spelling doaj-art-cd7a5347392e471dae4438a2cd8aa2df2025-08-20T02:19:54ZengWileyStem Cells International1687-966X1687-96782016-01-01201610.1155/2016/72761507276150Decellularized and Engineered Tendons as Biological Substitutes: A Critical ReviewArianna B. Lovati0Marta Bottagisio1Matteo Moretti2Cell and Tissue Engineering Laboratory, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, Via R. Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milan, ItalyCell and Tissue Engineering Laboratory, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, Via R. Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milan, ItalyCell and Tissue Engineering Laboratory, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, Via R. Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milan, ItalyTendon ruptures are a great burden in clinics. Finding a proper graft material as a substitute for tendon repair is one of the main challenges in orthopaedics, for which the requirement of a biological scaffold would be different for each clinical application. Among biological scaffolds, the use of decellularized tendon-derived matrix increasingly represents an interesting approach to treat tendon ruptures. We analyzed in vitro and in vivo studies focused on the development of efficient protocols for the decellularization and for the cell reseeding of the tendon matrix to obtain medical devices for tendon substitution. Our review considered also the proper tendon source and preclinical animal models with the aim of entering into clinical trials. The results highlight a wide panorama in terms of allogenic or xenogeneic tendon sources, specimen dimensions, physical or chemical decellularization techniques, and the cell type variety for reseeding from terminally differentiated to undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells and their static or dynamic culture employed to generate implantable constructs tested in different animal models. We try to identify the most efficient approach to achieve an optimal biological scaffold for biomechanics and intrinsic properties, resembling the native tendon and being applicable in clinics in the near future, with particular attention to the Achilles tendon substitution.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7276150
spellingShingle Arianna B. Lovati
Marta Bottagisio
Matteo Moretti
Decellularized and Engineered Tendons as Biological Substitutes: A Critical Review
Stem Cells International
title Decellularized and Engineered Tendons as Biological Substitutes: A Critical Review
title_full Decellularized and Engineered Tendons as Biological Substitutes: A Critical Review
title_fullStr Decellularized and Engineered Tendons as Biological Substitutes: A Critical Review
title_full_unstemmed Decellularized and Engineered Tendons as Biological Substitutes: A Critical Review
title_short Decellularized and Engineered Tendons as Biological Substitutes: A Critical Review
title_sort decellularized and engineered tendons as biological substitutes a critical review
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7276150
work_keys_str_mv AT ariannablovati decellularizedandengineeredtendonsasbiologicalsubstitutesacriticalreview
AT martabottagisio decellularizedandengineeredtendonsasbiologicalsubstitutesacriticalreview
AT matteomoretti decellularizedandengineeredtendonsasbiologicalsubstitutesacriticalreview