Histopathologic Progression and Metastatic Relapse Outcomes in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Urinary Tract
ABSTRACT Introduction Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary tract (SCNEC‐URO) has an inferior prognosis compared to conventional urothelial carcinoma (UC). Here, we evaluate the predictors and patterns of relapse after surgery. Materials and Methods We identified a definitive‐surgery co...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Cancer Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70594 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832589797111103488 |
---|---|
author | Mohammad Jad Moussa Georges C. Tabet Arlene O. Siefker‐Radtke Lianchun Xiao Nathaniel R. Wilson Jianjun Gao Christopher J. Logothetis Petros Grivas Byron Lee Amishi Y. Shah Pavlos Msaouel Roger Li Leticia Campos Clemente Jianping Zhao Nizar M. Tannir Ashish M. Kamat Donna E. Hansel Charles C. Guo Matthew T. Campbell Omar Alhalabi |
author_facet | Mohammad Jad Moussa Georges C. Tabet Arlene O. Siefker‐Radtke Lianchun Xiao Nathaniel R. Wilson Jianjun Gao Christopher J. Logothetis Petros Grivas Byron Lee Amishi Y. Shah Pavlos Msaouel Roger Li Leticia Campos Clemente Jianping Zhao Nizar M. Tannir Ashish M. Kamat Donna E. Hansel Charles C. Guo Matthew T. Campbell Omar Alhalabi |
author_sort | Mohammad Jad Moussa |
collection | DOAJ |
description | ABSTRACT Introduction Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary tract (SCNEC‐URO) has an inferior prognosis compared to conventional urothelial carcinoma (UC). Here, we evaluate the predictors and patterns of relapse after surgery. Materials and Methods We identified a definitive‐surgery cohort (n = 224) from an institutional database of patients with cT1‐T4NxM0 SCNEC‐URO treated in 1985–2021. Histopathologic review was conducted by independent pathologists. Relapse event was the time‐to‐event outcome, and relapse probabilities were estimated using a competing risk method with cumulative incidence functions (CIFs). Fine‐Gray distribution models assessed covariate associations. Results Most patients (161, 71.9%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCTX). Ninety two (41%) patients had relapse with 77 (83.7%) having distant organs as first metastatic sites, including 10 (10.9%) with exclusive central nervous system (CNS) metastases, mostly (9/10) within 1 year of surgery. Patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoCTx had the lowest 5‐year CIF (16.5% [95% CI 9.3%–25.6%]). Patients with remaining exclusively small cell (SC) histology had the highest CIF (85.7% [95% CI 46.6–96.9]). Patients with eradicated SCNEC but remaining UC components had an intermediate‐risk CIF (32.5% [95% CI 18.6–47.2]). Multivariable analysis adjusting for neoCTx, clinical stage at diagnosis (T3/4, N0/N+ vs. T1/T2, N0), and pathologic stage (pN+ vs. pN0) demonstrated that any SCNEC histology at resection (vs. pCR) was associated with relapse risk (hazard ratio = 3.69 [95% CI 1.91–7.13], p = 0.0001). Conclusions SCNEC‐URO is a systemic disease with high risk of distant relapse including CNS. Our findings highlight unmet needs for neoadjuvant/adjuvant approaches targeting the rare SCNEC subtype and suggest adding CNS surveillance within the first year after definitive surgery to high‐risk patients. Précis (Condensed Abstract) Alongside neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cancer stage, histology at resection strongly impacts relapse risk in small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the urinary tract. The incidence of brain metastasis is notably higher than in “traditional” urothelial cancer within the first year after surgery, especially if small cell cancer persists, thus necessitating close neurological monitoring during this period. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-cd5527849bff493cb9222beac89525f6 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2045-7634 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Cancer Medicine |
spelling | doaj-art-cd5527849bff493cb9222beac89525f62025-01-24T08:46:07ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342025-01-01142n/an/a10.1002/cam4.70594Histopathologic Progression and Metastatic Relapse Outcomes in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Urinary TractMohammad Jad Moussa0Georges C. Tabet1Arlene O. Siefker‐Radtke2Lianchun Xiao3Nathaniel R. Wilson4Jianjun Gao5Christopher J. Logothetis6Petros Grivas7Byron Lee8Amishi Y. Shah9Pavlos Msaouel10Roger Li11Leticia Campos Clemente12Jianping Zhao13Nizar M. Tannir14Ashish M. Kamat15Donna E. Hansel16Charles C. Guo17Matthew T. Campbell18Omar Alhalabi19Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USADivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine University of Washington School of Medicine Seattle Washington USADivision of Surgery, Department of Urology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADepartment of Genitourinary Oncology H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa Florida USADepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Surgery, Department of Urology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USAABSTRACT Introduction Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary tract (SCNEC‐URO) has an inferior prognosis compared to conventional urothelial carcinoma (UC). Here, we evaluate the predictors and patterns of relapse after surgery. Materials and Methods We identified a definitive‐surgery cohort (n = 224) from an institutional database of patients with cT1‐T4NxM0 SCNEC‐URO treated in 1985–2021. Histopathologic review was conducted by independent pathologists. Relapse event was the time‐to‐event outcome, and relapse probabilities were estimated using a competing risk method with cumulative incidence functions (CIFs). Fine‐Gray distribution models assessed covariate associations. Results Most patients (161, 71.9%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCTX). Ninety two (41%) patients had relapse with 77 (83.7%) having distant organs as first metastatic sites, including 10 (10.9%) with exclusive central nervous system (CNS) metastases, mostly (9/10) within 1 year of surgery. Patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoCTx had the lowest 5‐year CIF (16.5% [95% CI 9.3%–25.6%]). Patients with remaining exclusively small cell (SC) histology had the highest CIF (85.7% [95% CI 46.6–96.9]). Patients with eradicated SCNEC but remaining UC components had an intermediate‐risk CIF (32.5% [95% CI 18.6–47.2]). Multivariable analysis adjusting for neoCTx, clinical stage at diagnosis (T3/4, N0/N+ vs. T1/T2, N0), and pathologic stage (pN+ vs. pN0) demonstrated that any SCNEC histology at resection (vs. pCR) was associated with relapse risk (hazard ratio = 3.69 [95% CI 1.91–7.13], p = 0.0001). Conclusions SCNEC‐URO is a systemic disease with high risk of distant relapse including CNS. Our findings highlight unmet needs for neoadjuvant/adjuvant approaches targeting the rare SCNEC subtype and suggest adding CNS surveillance within the first year after definitive surgery to high‐risk patients. Précis (Condensed Abstract) Alongside neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cancer stage, histology at resection strongly impacts relapse risk in small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the urinary tract. The incidence of brain metastasis is notably higher than in “traditional” urothelial cancer within the first year after surgery, especially if small cell cancer persists, thus necessitating close neurological monitoring during this period.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70594bladder cancermetastatic relapseneuroendocrine carcinomaprognostic factorssmall cell carcinomasurgical outcomes |
spellingShingle | Mohammad Jad Moussa Georges C. Tabet Arlene O. Siefker‐Radtke Lianchun Xiao Nathaniel R. Wilson Jianjun Gao Christopher J. Logothetis Petros Grivas Byron Lee Amishi Y. Shah Pavlos Msaouel Roger Li Leticia Campos Clemente Jianping Zhao Nizar M. Tannir Ashish M. Kamat Donna E. Hansel Charles C. Guo Matthew T. Campbell Omar Alhalabi Histopathologic Progression and Metastatic Relapse Outcomes in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Urinary Tract Cancer Medicine bladder cancer metastatic relapse neuroendocrine carcinoma prognostic factors small cell carcinoma surgical outcomes |
title | Histopathologic Progression and Metastatic Relapse Outcomes in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Urinary Tract |
title_full | Histopathologic Progression and Metastatic Relapse Outcomes in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Urinary Tract |
title_fullStr | Histopathologic Progression and Metastatic Relapse Outcomes in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Urinary Tract |
title_full_unstemmed | Histopathologic Progression and Metastatic Relapse Outcomes in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Urinary Tract |
title_short | Histopathologic Progression and Metastatic Relapse Outcomes in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Urinary Tract |
title_sort | histopathologic progression and metastatic relapse outcomes in small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the urinary tract |
topic | bladder cancer metastatic relapse neuroendocrine carcinoma prognostic factors small cell carcinoma surgical outcomes |
url | https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70594 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohammadjadmoussa histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT georgesctabet histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT arleneosiefkerradtke histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT lianchunxiao histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT nathanielrwilson histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT jianjungao histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT christopherjlogothetis histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT petrosgrivas histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT byronlee histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT amishiyshah histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT pavlosmsaouel histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT rogerli histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT leticiacamposclemente histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT jianpingzhao histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT nizarmtannir histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT ashishmkamat histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT donnaehansel histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT charlescguo histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT matthewtcampbell histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract AT omaralhalabi histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract |