Histopathologic Progression and Metastatic Relapse Outcomes in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Urinary Tract

ABSTRACT Introduction Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary tract (SCNEC‐URO) has an inferior prognosis compared to conventional urothelial carcinoma (UC). Here, we evaluate the predictors and patterns of relapse after surgery. Materials and Methods We identified a definitive‐surgery co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Jad Moussa, Georges C. Tabet, Arlene O. Siefker‐Radtke, Lianchun Xiao, Nathaniel R. Wilson, Jianjun Gao, Christopher J. Logothetis, Petros Grivas, Byron Lee, Amishi Y. Shah, Pavlos Msaouel, Roger Li, Leticia Campos Clemente, Jianping Zhao, Nizar M. Tannir, Ashish M. Kamat, Donna E. Hansel, Charles C. Guo, Matthew T. Campbell, Omar Alhalabi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70594
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832589797111103488
author Mohammad Jad Moussa
Georges C. Tabet
Arlene O. Siefker‐Radtke
Lianchun Xiao
Nathaniel R. Wilson
Jianjun Gao
Christopher J. Logothetis
Petros Grivas
Byron Lee
Amishi Y. Shah
Pavlos Msaouel
Roger Li
Leticia Campos Clemente
Jianping Zhao
Nizar M. Tannir
Ashish M. Kamat
Donna E. Hansel
Charles C. Guo
Matthew T. Campbell
Omar Alhalabi
author_facet Mohammad Jad Moussa
Georges C. Tabet
Arlene O. Siefker‐Radtke
Lianchun Xiao
Nathaniel R. Wilson
Jianjun Gao
Christopher J. Logothetis
Petros Grivas
Byron Lee
Amishi Y. Shah
Pavlos Msaouel
Roger Li
Leticia Campos Clemente
Jianping Zhao
Nizar M. Tannir
Ashish M. Kamat
Donna E. Hansel
Charles C. Guo
Matthew T. Campbell
Omar Alhalabi
author_sort Mohammad Jad Moussa
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Introduction Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary tract (SCNEC‐URO) has an inferior prognosis compared to conventional urothelial carcinoma (UC). Here, we evaluate the predictors and patterns of relapse after surgery. Materials and Methods We identified a definitive‐surgery cohort (n = 224) from an institutional database of patients with cT1‐T4NxM0 SCNEC‐URO treated in 1985–2021. Histopathologic review was conducted by independent pathologists. Relapse event was the time‐to‐event outcome, and relapse probabilities were estimated using a competing risk method with cumulative incidence functions (CIFs). Fine‐Gray distribution models assessed covariate associations. Results Most patients (161, 71.9%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCTX). Ninety two (41%) patients had relapse with 77 (83.7%) having distant organs as first metastatic sites, including 10 (10.9%) with exclusive central nervous system (CNS) metastases, mostly (9/10) within 1 year of surgery. Patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoCTx had the lowest 5‐year CIF (16.5% [95% CI 9.3%–25.6%]). Patients with remaining exclusively small cell (SC) histology had the highest CIF (85.7% [95% CI 46.6–96.9]). Patients with eradicated SCNEC but remaining UC components had an intermediate‐risk CIF (32.5% [95% CI 18.6–47.2]). Multivariable analysis adjusting for neoCTx, clinical stage at diagnosis (T3/4, N0/N+ vs. T1/T2, N0), and pathologic stage (pN+ vs. pN0) demonstrated that any SCNEC histology at resection (vs. pCR) was associated with relapse risk (hazard ratio = 3.69 [95% CI 1.91–7.13], p = 0.0001). Conclusions SCNEC‐URO is a systemic disease with high risk of distant relapse including CNS. Our findings highlight unmet needs for neoadjuvant/adjuvant approaches targeting the rare SCNEC subtype and suggest adding CNS surveillance within the first year after definitive surgery to high‐risk patients. Précis (Condensed Abstract) Alongside neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cancer stage, histology at resection strongly impacts relapse risk in small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the urinary tract. The incidence of brain metastasis is notably higher than in “traditional” urothelial cancer within the first year after surgery, especially if small cell cancer persists, thus necessitating close neurological monitoring during this period.
format Article
id doaj-art-cd5527849bff493cb9222beac89525f6
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-7634
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj-art-cd5527849bff493cb9222beac89525f62025-01-24T08:46:07ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342025-01-01142n/an/a10.1002/cam4.70594Histopathologic Progression and Metastatic Relapse Outcomes in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Urinary TractMohammad Jad Moussa0Georges C. Tabet1Arlene O. Siefker‐Radtke2Lianchun Xiao3Nathaniel R. Wilson4Jianjun Gao5Christopher J. Logothetis6Petros Grivas7Byron Lee8Amishi Y. Shah9Pavlos Msaouel10Roger Li11Leticia Campos Clemente12Jianping Zhao13Nizar M. Tannir14Ashish M. Kamat15Donna E. Hansel16Charles C. Guo17Matthew T. Campbell18Omar Alhalabi19Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USADivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine University of Washington School of Medicine Seattle Washington USADivision of Surgery, Department of Urology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADepartment of Genitourinary Oncology H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa Florida USADepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Surgery, Department of Urology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USADivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USAABSTRACT Introduction Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary tract (SCNEC‐URO) has an inferior prognosis compared to conventional urothelial carcinoma (UC). Here, we evaluate the predictors and patterns of relapse after surgery. Materials and Methods We identified a definitive‐surgery cohort (n = 224) from an institutional database of patients with cT1‐T4NxM0 SCNEC‐URO treated in 1985–2021. Histopathologic review was conducted by independent pathologists. Relapse event was the time‐to‐event outcome, and relapse probabilities were estimated using a competing risk method with cumulative incidence functions (CIFs). Fine‐Gray distribution models assessed covariate associations. Results Most patients (161, 71.9%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCTX). Ninety two (41%) patients had relapse with 77 (83.7%) having distant organs as first metastatic sites, including 10 (10.9%) with exclusive central nervous system (CNS) metastases, mostly (9/10) within 1 year of surgery. Patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoCTx had the lowest 5‐year CIF (16.5% [95% CI 9.3%–25.6%]). Patients with remaining exclusively small cell (SC) histology had the highest CIF (85.7% [95% CI 46.6–96.9]). Patients with eradicated SCNEC but remaining UC components had an intermediate‐risk CIF (32.5% [95% CI 18.6–47.2]). Multivariable analysis adjusting for neoCTx, clinical stage at diagnosis (T3/4, N0/N+ vs. T1/T2, N0), and pathologic stage (pN+ vs. pN0) demonstrated that any SCNEC histology at resection (vs. pCR) was associated with relapse risk (hazard ratio = 3.69 [95% CI 1.91–7.13], p = 0.0001). Conclusions SCNEC‐URO is a systemic disease with high risk of distant relapse including CNS. Our findings highlight unmet needs for neoadjuvant/adjuvant approaches targeting the rare SCNEC subtype and suggest adding CNS surveillance within the first year after definitive surgery to high‐risk patients. Précis (Condensed Abstract) Alongside neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cancer stage, histology at resection strongly impacts relapse risk in small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the urinary tract. The incidence of brain metastasis is notably higher than in “traditional” urothelial cancer within the first year after surgery, especially if small cell cancer persists, thus necessitating close neurological monitoring during this period.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70594bladder cancermetastatic relapseneuroendocrine carcinomaprognostic factorssmall cell carcinomasurgical outcomes
spellingShingle Mohammad Jad Moussa
Georges C. Tabet
Arlene O. Siefker‐Radtke
Lianchun Xiao
Nathaniel R. Wilson
Jianjun Gao
Christopher J. Logothetis
Petros Grivas
Byron Lee
Amishi Y. Shah
Pavlos Msaouel
Roger Li
Leticia Campos Clemente
Jianping Zhao
Nizar M. Tannir
Ashish M. Kamat
Donna E. Hansel
Charles C. Guo
Matthew T. Campbell
Omar Alhalabi
Histopathologic Progression and Metastatic Relapse Outcomes in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Urinary Tract
Cancer Medicine
bladder cancer
metastatic relapse
neuroendocrine carcinoma
prognostic factors
small cell carcinoma
surgical outcomes
title Histopathologic Progression and Metastatic Relapse Outcomes in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Urinary Tract
title_full Histopathologic Progression and Metastatic Relapse Outcomes in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Urinary Tract
title_fullStr Histopathologic Progression and Metastatic Relapse Outcomes in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Urinary Tract
title_full_unstemmed Histopathologic Progression and Metastatic Relapse Outcomes in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Urinary Tract
title_short Histopathologic Progression and Metastatic Relapse Outcomes in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Urinary Tract
title_sort histopathologic progression and metastatic relapse outcomes in small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the urinary tract
topic bladder cancer
metastatic relapse
neuroendocrine carcinoma
prognostic factors
small cell carcinoma
surgical outcomes
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70594
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadjadmoussa histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT georgesctabet histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT arleneosiefkerradtke histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT lianchunxiao histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT nathanielrwilson histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT jianjungao histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT christopherjlogothetis histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT petrosgrivas histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT byronlee histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT amishiyshah histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT pavlosmsaouel histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT rogerli histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT leticiacamposclemente histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT jianpingzhao histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT nizarmtannir histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT ashishmkamat histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT donnaehansel histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT charlescguo histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT matthewtcampbell histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract
AT omaralhalabi histopathologicprogressionandmetastaticrelapseoutcomesinsmallcellneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheurinarytract