Impact of Surgery Timing on Outcomes After Nerve Transfer to Restore Elbow Flexion

Background:. Nerve reconstruction following brachial plexus injury (BPI) is a time-sensitive procedure, and surgical delay may negatively impact muscle reinnervation and outcomes. This study investigated the impact of surgical timing on elbow flexion strength in patients with BPI undergoing nerve tr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katie Hicks, MD, Justin Haas, BSc, Moaath Saggaf, MD, Christine B. Novak, PhD, Jana Dengler, MD, MASc, FRCS(C)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2025-02-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006460
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849765521928486912
author Katie Hicks, MD
Justin Haas, BSc
Moaath Saggaf, MD
Christine B. Novak, PhD
Jana Dengler, MD, MASc, FRCS(C)
author_facet Katie Hicks, MD
Justin Haas, BSc
Moaath Saggaf, MD
Christine B. Novak, PhD
Jana Dengler, MD, MASc, FRCS(C)
author_sort Katie Hicks, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background:. Nerve reconstruction following brachial plexus injury (BPI) is a time-sensitive procedure, and surgical delay may negatively impact muscle reinnervation and outcomes. This study investigated the impact of surgical timing on elbow flexion strength in patients with BPI undergoing nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion. Methods:. Following PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. English-language studies investigating the single fascicular transfer (SFT) or double fascicular transfer (DFT) to restore elbow flexion in BPI were included. Data were analyzed to identify the predictors of elbow flexion strength: surgery timing, age, injury level, and SFT versus DFT. Results:. The literature search identified 1051 articles. Studies (n = 31) reporting data of individual patients who underwent SFT (n = 341) or DFT (n = 67) were included; the mean age was 29.6 ± 11.2 years, time from injury to surgery was 6.5 ± 5.0 months, and follow-up was 27.1 ± 24.3 months. Good elbow flexion strength was found: Medical Research Council grade greater than or equal to 3 in 352 (86.3%) and Medical Research Council grade greater than or equal to 4 in 288 (70.6%). In the adjusted analysis, poorer motor recovery was associated with increased age (P = 0.02), surgical delay (P < 0.0001), C5-7 injuries (P < 0.01), and pan-plexus injuries (P < 0.0001). A 32% reduction in the odds of favorable motor recovery was observed with a 3-month delay to surgery. Patients who had a nerve transfer 6 months or earlier from injury had 2.4 times the odds of favorable motor recovery (P < 0.001). Conclusions:. SFT and DFT provide excellent elbow flexion strength in the majority of patients. Following nerve transfers in individuals with BPI, poorer motor recovery was observed with each 3-month delay to surgery.
format Article
id doaj-art-cd2ae10607794f44b980e058e833e018
institution DOAJ
issn 2169-7574
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
spelling doaj-art-cd2ae10607794f44b980e058e833e0182025-08-20T03:04:49ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742025-02-01132e646010.1097/GOX.0000000000006460202502000-00047Impact of Surgery Timing on Outcomes After Nerve Transfer to Restore Elbow FlexionKatie Hicks, MD0Justin Haas, BSc1Moaath Saggaf, MD2Christine B. Novak, PhD3Jana Dengler, MD, MASc, FRCS(C)4From the * Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaFrom the * Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaFrom the * Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaFrom the * Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaFrom the * Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaBackground:. Nerve reconstruction following brachial plexus injury (BPI) is a time-sensitive procedure, and surgical delay may negatively impact muscle reinnervation and outcomes. This study investigated the impact of surgical timing on elbow flexion strength in patients with BPI undergoing nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion. Methods:. Following PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. English-language studies investigating the single fascicular transfer (SFT) or double fascicular transfer (DFT) to restore elbow flexion in BPI were included. Data were analyzed to identify the predictors of elbow flexion strength: surgery timing, age, injury level, and SFT versus DFT. Results:. The literature search identified 1051 articles. Studies (n = 31) reporting data of individual patients who underwent SFT (n = 341) or DFT (n = 67) were included; the mean age was 29.6 ± 11.2 years, time from injury to surgery was 6.5 ± 5.0 months, and follow-up was 27.1 ± 24.3 months. Good elbow flexion strength was found: Medical Research Council grade greater than or equal to 3 in 352 (86.3%) and Medical Research Council grade greater than or equal to 4 in 288 (70.6%). In the adjusted analysis, poorer motor recovery was associated with increased age (P = 0.02), surgical delay (P < 0.0001), C5-7 injuries (P < 0.01), and pan-plexus injuries (P < 0.0001). A 32% reduction in the odds of favorable motor recovery was observed with a 3-month delay to surgery. Patients who had a nerve transfer 6 months or earlier from injury had 2.4 times the odds of favorable motor recovery (P < 0.001). Conclusions:. SFT and DFT provide excellent elbow flexion strength in the majority of patients. Following nerve transfers in individuals with BPI, poorer motor recovery was observed with each 3-month delay to surgery.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006460
spellingShingle Katie Hicks, MD
Justin Haas, BSc
Moaath Saggaf, MD
Christine B. Novak, PhD
Jana Dengler, MD, MASc, FRCS(C)
Impact of Surgery Timing on Outcomes After Nerve Transfer to Restore Elbow Flexion
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
title Impact of Surgery Timing on Outcomes After Nerve Transfer to Restore Elbow Flexion
title_full Impact of Surgery Timing on Outcomes After Nerve Transfer to Restore Elbow Flexion
title_fullStr Impact of Surgery Timing on Outcomes After Nerve Transfer to Restore Elbow Flexion
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Surgery Timing on Outcomes After Nerve Transfer to Restore Elbow Flexion
title_short Impact of Surgery Timing on Outcomes After Nerve Transfer to Restore Elbow Flexion
title_sort impact of surgery timing on outcomes after nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006460
work_keys_str_mv AT katiehicksmd impactofsurgerytimingonoutcomesafternervetransfertorestoreelbowflexion
AT justinhaasbsc impactofsurgerytimingonoutcomesafternervetransfertorestoreelbowflexion
AT moaathsaggafmd impactofsurgerytimingonoutcomesafternervetransfertorestoreelbowflexion
AT christinebnovakphd impactofsurgerytimingonoutcomesafternervetransfertorestoreelbowflexion
AT janadenglermdmascfrcsc impactofsurgerytimingonoutcomesafternervetransfertorestoreelbowflexion