Impact of Alternative Feed Ingredients and Feeding Strategies on Growth, Muscle Morphology, and Fillet Quality of Genetically Selected Gilthead Seabream (<i>Sparus aurata</i>) in a Long-Term Feeding Trial

Aquaculture advancement depends on alternative raw materials to reduce reliance on fishmeal (FM) and fish oil (FO) from extractive fisheries. Strategies like restricted feeding reduce costs and improve sustainability by minimizing feed waste and enhancing water quality, while selective breeding boos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paula Sarmiento, Pedro L. Castro, Rafael Ginés
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/15/13/1913
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849319962758348800
author Paula Sarmiento
Pedro L. Castro
Rafael Ginés
author_facet Paula Sarmiento
Pedro L. Castro
Rafael Ginés
author_sort Paula Sarmiento
collection DOAJ
description Aquaculture advancement depends on alternative raw materials to reduce reliance on fishmeal (FM) and fish oil (FO) from extractive fisheries. Strategies like restricted feeding reduce costs and improve sustainability by minimizing feed waste and enhancing water quality, while selective breeding boosts growth and adapts fish to innovative diets. However, these measures may affect quality and shelf life. Gilthead seabream selected for high growth or non-selected were fed in 500 L tanks for 300 days until apparent satiety (AS) or with food restrictions (85AS or 65AS) using a control diet with low FM and FO balanced with vegetable ingredients, and an alternative diet (ALT) where FM was substantially replaced with insect, poultry by-product, feather, and porcine blood meals, while FO was completely replaced by microalgae, poultry, and salmon by-product oils. The ALT diet improved EPA + DHA levels, <i>n</i>-3/<i>n</i>-6 ratio, and fillet hardness. The selected fish outperformed the non-selected ones in growth and were more resilient to ALT diet and feeding restrictions. The 85AS feeding strategy optimized fillet quality by preventing lipid accumulation and muscle adaptations, as observed with the other feeding strategies. Combining sustainable feed formulations, genetic selection, and moderate feed restriction enables a viable, long-term strategy for high-quality, environmentally responsible seabream farming.
format Article
id doaj-art-cd199ab411ec4fda8f5792eeb8f47d46
institution Kabale University
issn 2076-2615
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj-art-cd199ab411ec4fda8f5792eeb8f47d462025-08-20T03:50:16ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152025-06-011513191310.3390/ani15131913Impact of Alternative Feed Ingredients and Feeding Strategies on Growth, Muscle Morphology, and Fillet Quality of Genetically Selected Gilthead Seabream (<i>Sparus aurata</i>) in a Long-Term Feeding TrialPaula Sarmiento0Pedro L. Castro1Rafael Ginés2Aquaculture Research Group (GIA), Institute of Sustainable Aquaculture and Marine Ecosystems (IU-ECOAQUA), University of Las Palmas Gran Canaria, 35214 Telde, SpainAquaculture Research Group (GIA), Institute of Sustainable Aquaculture and Marine Ecosystems (IU-ECOAQUA), University of Las Palmas Gran Canaria, 35214 Telde, SpainAquaculture Research Group (GIA), Institute of Sustainable Aquaculture and Marine Ecosystems (IU-ECOAQUA), University of Las Palmas Gran Canaria, 35214 Telde, SpainAquaculture advancement depends on alternative raw materials to reduce reliance on fishmeal (FM) and fish oil (FO) from extractive fisheries. Strategies like restricted feeding reduce costs and improve sustainability by minimizing feed waste and enhancing water quality, while selective breeding boosts growth and adapts fish to innovative diets. However, these measures may affect quality and shelf life. Gilthead seabream selected for high growth or non-selected were fed in 500 L tanks for 300 days until apparent satiety (AS) or with food restrictions (85AS or 65AS) using a control diet with low FM and FO balanced with vegetable ingredients, and an alternative diet (ALT) where FM was substantially replaced with insect, poultry by-product, feather, and porcine blood meals, while FO was completely replaced by microalgae, poultry, and salmon by-product oils. The ALT diet improved EPA + DHA levels, <i>n</i>-3/<i>n</i>-6 ratio, and fillet hardness. The selected fish outperformed the non-selected ones in growth and were more resilient to ALT diet and feeding restrictions. The 85AS feeding strategy optimized fillet quality by preventing lipid accumulation and muscle adaptations, as observed with the other feeding strategies. Combining sustainable feed formulations, genetic selection, and moderate feed restriction enables a viable, long-term strategy for high-quality, environmentally responsible seabream farming.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/15/13/1913gilthead seabreamalternative dietsselective breedingfeeding strategyfillet quality
spellingShingle Paula Sarmiento
Pedro L. Castro
Rafael Ginés
Impact of Alternative Feed Ingredients and Feeding Strategies on Growth, Muscle Morphology, and Fillet Quality of Genetically Selected Gilthead Seabream (<i>Sparus aurata</i>) in a Long-Term Feeding Trial
Animals
gilthead seabream
alternative diets
selective breeding
feeding strategy
fillet quality
title Impact of Alternative Feed Ingredients and Feeding Strategies on Growth, Muscle Morphology, and Fillet Quality of Genetically Selected Gilthead Seabream (<i>Sparus aurata</i>) in a Long-Term Feeding Trial
title_full Impact of Alternative Feed Ingredients and Feeding Strategies on Growth, Muscle Morphology, and Fillet Quality of Genetically Selected Gilthead Seabream (<i>Sparus aurata</i>) in a Long-Term Feeding Trial
title_fullStr Impact of Alternative Feed Ingredients and Feeding Strategies on Growth, Muscle Morphology, and Fillet Quality of Genetically Selected Gilthead Seabream (<i>Sparus aurata</i>) in a Long-Term Feeding Trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Alternative Feed Ingredients and Feeding Strategies on Growth, Muscle Morphology, and Fillet Quality of Genetically Selected Gilthead Seabream (<i>Sparus aurata</i>) in a Long-Term Feeding Trial
title_short Impact of Alternative Feed Ingredients and Feeding Strategies on Growth, Muscle Morphology, and Fillet Quality of Genetically Selected Gilthead Seabream (<i>Sparus aurata</i>) in a Long-Term Feeding Trial
title_sort impact of alternative feed ingredients and feeding strategies on growth muscle morphology and fillet quality of genetically selected gilthead seabream i sparus aurata i in a long term feeding trial
topic gilthead seabream
alternative diets
selective breeding
feeding strategy
fillet quality
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/15/13/1913
work_keys_str_mv AT paulasarmiento impactofalternativefeedingredientsandfeedingstrategiesongrowthmusclemorphologyandfilletqualityofgeneticallyselectedgiltheadseabreamisparusaurataiinalongtermfeedingtrial
AT pedrolcastro impactofalternativefeedingredientsandfeedingstrategiesongrowthmusclemorphologyandfilletqualityofgeneticallyselectedgiltheadseabreamisparusaurataiinalongtermfeedingtrial
AT rafaelgines impactofalternativefeedingredientsandfeedingstrategiesongrowthmusclemorphologyandfilletqualityofgeneticallyselectedgiltheadseabreamisparusaurataiinalongtermfeedingtrial