Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Standard and Non-standard Computer Perimetry Methods in the Early Diagnosis of Glaucoma

Purpose: tо compare the effectiveness of standard automated perimetry (SAP) and two non-standard perimetry methods in the diagnosis of the early stage primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).Patients and methods. The study involved 18 patients (32 eyes) with the early POAG, 10 women, 8 men (average age o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I. L. Simakova, A. N. Kulikov, S. A. Serdyukova, I. A. Tikhonovskay
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Ophthalmology Publishing Group 2025-06-01
Series:Oftalʹmologiâ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/2667
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849687492751523840
author I. L. Simakova
A. N. Kulikov
S. A. Serdyukova
I. A. Tikhonovskay
author_facet I. L. Simakova
A. N. Kulikov
S. A. Serdyukova
I. A. Tikhonovskay
author_sort I. L. Simakova
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: tо compare the effectiveness of standard automated perimetry (SAP) and two non-standard perimetry methods in the diagnosis of the early stage primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).Patients and methods. The study involved 18 patients (32 eyes) with the early POAG, 10 women, 8 men (average age of 56.2 ± 1.4 years). The control group included 32 healthy people (32 eyes), (average age of 56.4 ± 3.9 years). In addition to the routine ophthalmic examination all subjects underwent SAP (Octopus 900, threshold strategy “G TOP”) and two methods of non-standard perimetry — the author’s own modification of Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry (threshold strategies “FDT-16” and “FDT-64”) and Pulsar perimetry (Octopus 600). Morphometric assessment of the optic nerve head was performed using stereoophthalmoscopy and retinotomography (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 and RTVue FD-OCT). Optical coherence tomography was also used to assess the parameters of the retinal ganglion cell complex in the macular region.Results. Evaluating the sensitivity level of these 4 compared strategies (“FDT-16”, “FDT-64”, “Pulsar” Octopus 600 and “G TOP” Octopus 900) in patients with the early stage of POAG by mean MD index (87.1, 93.55, 54.84 and 80.65 % respectively) and by mean number of 10×10° squares with scotomas in the central visual field (90.32, 98.77, 51.61, and 83.87 % respectively) showed that both threshold FDT perimetry strategies were 7 to 15 % higher than the sensitivity of Octopus 900 (“G TOP”) and almost 2 times higher than the sensitivity of Octopus 600 (“Pulsar”). The specificity level of all three threshold strategies (“FDT-16”, “FDT-64” and “Pulsar”) of both non-standard perimetry methods was 100 %, and specificity level of SAP was 96.77 %. The correlation between the values of the MD index and the number of squares with scotomas in the central visual field according to the SAP data and all three threshold strategies data of the two non-standard perimetry methods was moderate and statistically significant.Conclusion. For diagnosis of early POAG a combination of standard and non-standard computer perimetry methods is advisable. Both FDT perimetry strategies had a significant advantage in the sensitivity level of their results compared to Pulsar perimetry data.
format Article
id doaj-art-cd06b10b104e4bc683776294a3df2ae8
institution DOAJ
issn 1816-5095
2500-0845
language Russian
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Ophthalmology Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Oftalʹmologiâ
spelling doaj-art-cd06b10b104e4bc683776294a3df2ae82025-08-20T03:22:19ZrusOphthalmology Publishing GroupOftalʹmologiâ1816-50952500-08452025-06-0122238339010.18008/1816-5095-2025-2-383-3901271Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Standard and Non-standard Computer Perimetry Methods in the Early Diagnosis of GlaucomaI. L. Simakova0A. N. Kulikov1S. A. Serdyukova2I. A. Tikhonovskay3S.M. Kirov Military Medical AcademyS.M. Kirov Military Medical AcademyS.M. Kirov Military Medical AcademyS.M. Kirov Military Medical AcademyPurpose: tо compare the effectiveness of standard automated perimetry (SAP) and two non-standard perimetry methods in the diagnosis of the early stage primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).Patients and methods. The study involved 18 patients (32 eyes) with the early POAG, 10 women, 8 men (average age of 56.2 ± 1.4 years). The control group included 32 healthy people (32 eyes), (average age of 56.4 ± 3.9 years). In addition to the routine ophthalmic examination all subjects underwent SAP (Octopus 900, threshold strategy “G TOP”) and two methods of non-standard perimetry — the author’s own modification of Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry (threshold strategies “FDT-16” and “FDT-64”) and Pulsar perimetry (Octopus 600). Morphometric assessment of the optic nerve head was performed using stereoophthalmoscopy and retinotomography (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 and RTVue FD-OCT). Optical coherence tomography was also used to assess the parameters of the retinal ganglion cell complex in the macular region.Results. Evaluating the sensitivity level of these 4 compared strategies (“FDT-16”, “FDT-64”, “Pulsar” Octopus 600 and “G TOP” Octopus 900) in patients with the early stage of POAG by mean MD index (87.1, 93.55, 54.84 and 80.65 % respectively) and by mean number of 10×10° squares with scotomas in the central visual field (90.32, 98.77, 51.61, and 83.87 % respectively) showed that both threshold FDT perimetry strategies were 7 to 15 % higher than the sensitivity of Octopus 900 (“G TOP”) and almost 2 times higher than the sensitivity of Octopus 600 (“Pulsar”). The specificity level of all three threshold strategies (“FDT-16”, “FDT-64” and “Pulsar”) of both non-standard perimetry methods was 100 %, and specificity level of SAP was 96.77 %. The correlation between the values of the MD index and the number of squares with scotomas in the central visual field according to the SAP data and all three threshold strategies data of the two non-standard perimetry methods was moderate and statistically significant.Conclusion. For diagnosis of early POAG a combination of standard and non-standard computer perimetry methods is advisable. Both FDT perimetry strategies had a significant advantage in the sensitivity level of their results compared to Pulsar perimetry data.https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/2667early diagnosis of glaucomastandard and non-standard perimetryfdt perimetrypulsar perimetry
spellingShingle I. L. Simakova
A. N. Kulikov
S. A. Serdyukova
I. A. Tikhonovskay
Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Standard and Non-standard Computer Perimetry Methods in the Early Diagnosis of Glaucoma
Oftalʹmologiâ
early diagnosis of glaucoma
standard and non-standard perimetry
fdt perimetry
pulsar perimetry
title Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Standard and Non-standard Computer Perimetry Methods in the Early Diagnosis of Glaucoma
title_full Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Standard and Non-standard Computer Perimetry Methods in the Early Diagnosis of Glaucoma
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Standard and Non-standard Computer Perimetry Methods in the Early Diagnosis of Glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Standard and Non-standard Computer Perimetry Methods in the Early Diagnosis of Glaucoma
title_short Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Standard and Non-standard Computer Perimetry Methods in the Early Diagnosis of Glaucoma
title_sort comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of standard and non standard computer perimetry methods in the early diagnosis of glaucoma
topic early diagnosis of glaucoma
standard and non-standard perimetry
fdt perimetry
pulsar perimetry
url https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/2667
work_keys_str_mv AT ilsimakova comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofstandardandnonstandardcomputerperimetrymethodsintheearlydiagnosisofglaucoma
AT ankulikov comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofstandardandnonstandardcomputerperimetrymethodsintheearlydiagnosisofglaucoma
AT saserdyukova comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofstandardandnonstandardcomputerperimetrymethodsintheearlydiagnosisofglaucoma
AT iatikhonovskay comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofstandardandnonstandardcomputerperimetrymethodsintheearlydiagnosisofglaucoma