Selecting indicators for the measurement of low-value care using German claims data: A three-round modified Delphi panel.

By reducing healthcare services that offer little benefit or potential harm to patients (low-value care), resources can be redirected towards more adequate treatments, improving healthcare efficiency and patient outcomes. This study aimed to systematically incorporate clinical expertise across medic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carolina Pioch, Anne Neubert, Lotte Dammertz, Hanna Ermann, Meik Hildebrandt, Peter Ihle, Monika Nothacker, Udo Schneider, Enno Swart, Reinhard Busse, Verena Vogt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314864
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849323444629405696
author Carolina Pioch
Anne Neubert
Lotte Dammertz
Hanna Ermann
Meik Hildebrandt
Peter Ihle
Monika Nothacker
Udo Schneider
Enno Swart
Reinhard Busse
Verena Vogt
author_facet Carolina Pioch
Anne Neubert
Lotte Dammertz
Hanna Ermann
Meik Hildebrandt
Peter Ihle
Monika Nothacker
Udo Schneider
Enno Swart
Reinhard Busse
Verena Vogt
author_sort Carolina Pioch
collection DOAJ
description By reducing healthcare services that offer little benefit or potential harm to patients (low-value care), resources can be redirected towards more adequate treatments, improving healthcare efficiency and patient outcomes. This study aimed to systematically incorporate clinical expertise across medical disciplines through a Delphi process to establish indicators for measuring low-value care, ensuring their acceptance by medical societies, the broader medical community, and patients. We developed two versions (one with higher sensitivity and one with higher specificity) for almost each of the 42 indicators identified as potentially measurable in a previous systematic review. We conducted a three-round modified Delphi panel based on the RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology, with 62 experts from 52 Scientific Medical Societies and professional organisations, and patient representatives. In round one, each indicator was rated for its ability to indicate low-value healthcare and its measurability in German claims data. This was followed by an online discussion in round two. The indicators were then modified based on expert feedback and re-assessed in round three. As a result, 24 indicators were deemed appropriate for measuring low-value care, covering areas such as pharmaceuticals, diagnostic tests, screening, and treatment. For example, one indicator identified patients with cancer who received chemotherapy in the last month of life. These indicators will help identify healthcare services that may require policy-level interventions to improve the quality of care. However, most low-value care indicators can only be measured in German claims data if documentation requirements for relevant information are expanded.
format Article
id doaj-art-cd01c80568ab46fdaec5321dc7fcbda4
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-cd01c80568ab46fdaec5321dc7fcbda42025-08-20T03:49:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01202e031486410.1371/journal.pone.0314864Selecting indicators for the measurement of low-value care using German claims data: A three-round modified Delphi panel.Carolina PiochAnne NeubertLotte DammertzHanna ErmannMeik HildebrandtPeter IhleMonika NothackerUdo SchneiderEnno SwartReinhard BusseVerena VogtBy reducing healthcare services that offer little benefit or potential harm to patients (low-value care), resources can be redirected towards more adequate treatments, improving healthcare efficiency and patient outcomes. This study aimed to systematically incorporate clinical expertise across medical disciplines through a Delphi process to establish indicators for measuring low-value care, ensuring their acceptance by medical societies, the broader medical community, and patients. We developed two versions (one with higher sensitivity and one with higher specificity) for almost each of the 42 indicators identified as potentially measurable in a previous systematic review. We conducted a three-round modified Delphi panel based on the RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology, with 62 experts from 52 Scientific Medical Societies and professional organisations, and patient representatives. In round one, each indicator was rated for its ability to indicate low-value healthcare and its measurability in German claims data. This was followed by an online discussion in round two. The indicators were then modified based on expert feedback and re-assessed in round three. As a result, 24 indicators were deemed appropriate for measuring low-value care, covering areas such as pharmaceuticals, diagnostic tests, screening, and treatment. For example, one indicator identified patients with cancer who received chemotherapy in the last month of life. These indicators will help identify healthcare services that may require policy-level interventions to improve the quality of care. However, most low-value care indicators can only be measured in German claims data if documentation requirements for relevant information are expanded.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314864
spellingShingle Carolina Pioch
Anne Neubert
Lotte Dammertz
Hanna Ermann
Meik Hildebrandt
Peter Ihle
Monika Nothacker
Udo Schneider
Enno Swart
Reinhard Busse
Verena Vogt
Selecting indicators for the measurement of low-value care using German claims data: A three-round modified Delphi panel.
PLoS ONE
title Selecting indicators for the measurement of low-value care using German claims data: A three-round modified Delphi panel.
title_full Selecting indicators for the measurement of low-value care using German claims data: A three-round modified Delphi panel.
title_fullStr Selecting indicators for the measurement of low-value care using German claims data: A three-round modified Delphi panel.
title_full_unstemmed Selecting indicators for the measurement of low-value care using German claims data: A three-round modified Delphi panel.
title_short Selecting indicators for the measurement of low-value care using German claims data: A three-round modified Delphi panel.
title_sort selecting indicators for the measurement of low value care using german claims data a three round modified delphi panel
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314864
work_keys_str_mv AT carolinapioch selectingindicatorsforthemeasurementoflowvaluecareusinggermanclaimsdataathreeroundmodifieddelphipanel
AT anneneubert selectingindicatorsforthemeasurementoflowvaluecareusinggermanclaimsdataathreeroundmodifieddelphipanel
AT lottedammertz selectingindicatorsforthemeasurementoflowvaluecareusinggermanclaimsdataathreeroundmodifieddelphipanel
AT hannaermann selectingindicatorsforthemeasurementoflowvaluecareusinggermanclaimsdataathreeroundmodifieddelphipanel
AT meikhildebrandt selectingindicatorsforthemeasurementoflowvaluecareusinggermanclaimsdataathreeroundmodifieddelphipanel
AT peterihle selectingindicatorsforthemeasurementoflowvaluecareusinggermanclaimsdataathreeroundmodifieddelphipanel
AT monikanothacker selectingindicatorsforthemeasurementoflowvaluecareusinggermanclaimsdataathreeroundmodifieddelphipanel
AT udoschneider selectingindicatorsforthemeasurementoflowvaluecareusinggermanclaimsdataathreeroundmodifieddelphipanel
AT ennoswart selectingindicatorsforthemeasurementoflowvaluecareusinggermanclaimsdataathreeroundmodifieddelphipanel
AT reinhardbusse selectingindicatorsforthemeasurementoflowvaluecareusinggermanclaimsdataathreeroundmodifieddelphipanel
AT verenavogt selectingindicatorsforthemeasurementoflowvaluecareusinggermanclaimsdataathreeroundmodifieddelphipanel