Internationally Mandatory Rules: Different Theories Explaining the Mechanism of their Application (Part II)
The article examines different theories, which were proposed in Western European literature for explanation of the notion of internationally mandatory rules (art. 1192 of Russian Civil Code). The content, advantages and disadvantages of the following theories are analyzed: theory of strictly territo...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO)
2010-06-01
|
| Series: | Московский журнал международного права |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/787 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849303749956206592 |
|---|---|
| author | A. V. Asoskov |
| author_facet | A. V. Asoskov |
| author_sort | A. V. Asoskov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article examines different theories, which were proposed in Western European literature for explanation of the notion of internationally mandatory rules (art. 1192 of Russian Civil Code). The content, advantages and disadvantages of the following theories are analyzed: theory of strictly territorial application of public law rules, special connection theory, theory of the proper law of contract, theory of taking internationally mandatory rules into consideration as facts of the case, as well as theory of special multilateral conflict of law rules.The author does not recommend using different criteria in order to determine the opportunity of taking into consideration the internationally mandatory rules of lex contractus, on the one hand, and internationally mandatory rules of third states, on the other hand. The author comes to the conclusion that the most promising are the special connection theory and theory of taking internationally mandatory rules into consideration as facts of the case, as well as their combination, which means the opportunity of application of this or that internationally mandatory rule on two consecutive levels – level of international private law and substantive law level. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ccf85d09b818469d8f042169b9028b2f |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0869-0049 2619-0893 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2010-06-01 |
| publisher | Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Московский журнал международного права |
| spelling | doaj-art-ccf85d09b818469d8f042169b9028b2f2025-08-20T03:55:58ZengMoscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO)Московский журнал международного права0869-00492619-08932010-06-0102486910.24833/0869-0049-2010-2-48-69733Internationally Mandatory Rules: Different Theories Explaining the Mechanism of their Application (Part II)A. V. Asoskov0Moscow State UniversityThe article examines different theories, which were proposed in Western European literature for explanation of the notion of internationally mandatory rules (art. 1192 of Russian Civil Code). The content, advantages and disadvantages of the following theories are analyzed: theory of strictly territorial application of public law rules, special connection theory, theory of the proper law of contract, theory of taking internationally mandatory rules into consideration as facts of the case, as well as theory of special multilateral conflict of law rules.The author does not recommend using different criteria in order to determine the opportunity of taking into consideration the internationally mandatory rules of lex contractus, on the one hand, and internationally mandatory rules of third states, on the other hand. The author comes to the conclusion that the most promising are the special connection theory and theory of taking internationally mandatory rules into consideration as facts of the case, as well as their combination, which means the opportunity of application of this or that internationally mandatory rule on two consecutive levels – level of international private law and substantive law level.https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/787internationally mandatory rulesrules of immediate applicationlex contractus1980 rome convention on the law applicable to contractual obligationsrome i ec regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations |
| spellingShingle | A. V. Asoskov Internationally Mandatory Rules: Different Theories Explaining the Mechanism of their Application (Part II) Московский журнал международного права internationally mandatory rules rules of immediate application lex contractus 1980 rome convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations rome i ec regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations |
| title | Internationally Mandatory Rules: Different Theories Explaining the Mechanism of their Application (Part II) |
| title_full | Internationally Mandatory Rules: Different Theories Explaining the Mechanism of their Application (Part II) |
| title_fullStr | Internationally Mandatory Rules: Different Theories Explaining the Mechanism of their Application (Part II) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Internationally Mandatory Rules: Different Theories Explaining the Mechanism of their Application (Part II) |
| title_short | Internationally Mandatory Rules: Different Theories Explaining the Mechanism of their Application (Part II) |
| title_sort | internationally mandatory rules different theories explaining the mechanism of their application part ii |
| topic | internationally mandatory rules rules of immediate application lex contractus 1980 rome convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations rome i ec regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations |
| url | https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/787 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT avasoskov internationallymandatoryrulesdifferenttheoriesexplainingthemechanismoftheirapplicationpartii |