Comparative Study on the Reinforced Sand-Bed and the Stone Column in Improving the Clay Deposit Supporting Isolated Footing

The working mechanism of a geotechnical structure can be understood from the deformations and the vertical stresses in the soil media. This article attempts to study the deformation, vertical stress development, and distribution of improved clay deposits carrying a single isolated footing. Through P...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Premalatha Krishnamurthy, Priyadharshini Maniam Rajan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Advances in Civil Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/8836116
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850172930879651840
author Premalatha Krishnamurthy
Priyadharshini Maniam Rajan
author_facet Premalatha Krishnamurthy
Priyadharshini Maniam Rajan
author_sort Premalatha Krishnamurthy
collection DOAJ
description The working mechanism of a geotechnical structure can be understood from the deformations and the vertical stresses in the soil media. This article attempts to study the deformation, vertical stress development, and distribution of improved clay deposits carrying a single isolated footing. Through PLAXIS 3D software, numerical analyses were conducted for the ground improvement methods, such as the geogrid reinforced sand-bed (GRSB) and ordinary and geogrid encased stone column installation (OSC and GESC). In GRSB, the results show that the stresses were maximum at the sand–clay interface at a depth of 0.67 B (B—footing width). It is proposed to place an additional layer of geogrid at the interface, and it must be within the critical depth, i.e., the width of the footing. Furthermore, for the current study, the stiffness of the geogrid in the sand layer greater than 500 kN/m was insignificant in soil improvement, whereas the optimum axial stiffness of the stone column encasement was 1,000 kN/m based on the stress concentration factor. The stone column installation improved the clay layer even below the depth of 0.67 B, improving the capacity of clay to carry higher vertical stresses on par with the stone columns. The GRSB carried higher vertical stresses than the unimproved ground. However, the OSC and GESC could carry vertical stresses higher than the GRSB. This knowledge can allow the practitioners to decide the depth of placement of the reinforcement and also to choose an alternate if one method is not feasible for the site.
format Article
id doaj-art-ccca703478b6430795b2ed9195ea4f5a
institution OA Journals
issn 1687-8094
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Civil Engineering
spelling doaj-art-ccca703478b6430795b2ed9195ea4f5a2025-08-20T02:19:57ZengWileyAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80942024-01-01202410.1155/2024/8836116Comparative Study on the Reinforced Sand-Bed and the Stone Column in Improving the Clay Deposit Supporting Isolated FootingPremalatha Krishnamurthy0Priyadharshini Maniam Rajan1Division of Soil Mechanics and Foundation EngineeringDivision of Soil Mechanics and Foundation EngineeringThe working mechanism of a geotechnical structure can be understood from the deformations and the vertical stresses in the soil media. This article attempts to study the deformation, vertical stress development, and distribution of improved clay deposits carrying a single isolated footing. Through PLAXIS 3D software, numerical analyses were conducted for the ground improvement methods, such as the geogrid reinforced sand-bed (GRSB) and ordinary and geogrid encased stone column installation (OSC and GESC). In GRSB, the results show that the stresses were maximum at the sand–clay interface at a depth of 0.67 B (B—footing width). It is proposed to place an additional layer of geogrid at the interface, and it must be within the critical depth, i.e., the width of the footing. Furthermore, for the current study, the stiffness of the geogrid in the sand layer greater than 500 kN/m was insignificant in soil improvement, whereas the optimum axial stiffness of the stone column encasement was 1,000 kN/m based on the stress concentration factor. The stone column installation improved the clay layer even below the depth of 0.67 B, improving the capacity of clay to carry higher vertical stresses on par with the stone columns. The GRSB carried higher vertical stresses than the unimproved ground. However, the OSC and GESC could carry vertical stresses higher than the GRSB. This knowledge can allow the practitioners to decide the depth of placement of the reinforcement and also to choose an alternate if one method is not feasible for the site.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/8836116
spellingShingle Premalatha Krishnamurthy
Priyadharshini Maniam Rajan
Comparative Study on the Reinforced Sand-Bed and the Stone Column in Improving the Clay Deposit Supporting Isolated Footing
Advances in Civil Engineering
title Comparative Study on the Reinforced Sand-Bed and the Stone Column in Improving the Clay Deposit Supporting Isolated Footing
title_full Comparative Study on the Reinforced Sand-Bed and the Stone Column in Improving the Clay Deposit Supporting Isolated Footing
title_fullStr Comparative Study on the Reinforced Sand-Bed and the Stone Column in Improving the Clay Deposit Supporting Isolated Footing
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study on the Reinforced Sand-Bed and the Stone Column in Improving the Clay Deposit Supporting Isolated Footing
title_short Comparative Study on the Reinforced Sand-Bed and the Stone Column in Improving the Clay Deposit Supporting Isolated Footing
title_sort comparative study on the reinforced sand bed and the stone column in improving the clay deposit supporting isolated footing
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/8836116
work_keys_str_mv AT premalathakrishnamurthy comparativestudyonthereinforcedsandbedandthestonecolumninimprovingtheclaydepositsupportingisolatedfooting
AT priyadharshinimaniamrajan comparativestudyonthereinforcedsandbedandthestonecolumninimprovingtheclaydepositsupportingisolatedfooting