Optimal Pest Control Strategies with Cost-effectiveness Analysis
Pest and plant diseases cause damages and economic losses, threatening food security and ecosystem services. Thus, proper pest management is indispensable to mitigate the risk of losses. The risk of environmental hazards induced by toxic chemicals alongside the rapid development of chemical resistan...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-01-01
|
Series: | The Scientific World Journal |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6630193 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832567404803129344 |
---|---|
author | Ihza Rizkia Fitri Farida Hanum Ali Kusnanto Toni Bakhtiar |
author_facet | Ihza Rizkia Fitri Farida Hanum Ali Kusnanto Toni Bakhtiar |
author_sort | Ihza Rizkia Fitri |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Pest and plant diseases cause damages and economic losses, threatening food security and ecosystem services. Thus, proper pest management is indispensable to mitigate the risk of losses. The risk of environmental hazards induced by toxic chemicals alongside the rapid development of chemical resistance by insects entails more resilient, sustainable, and ecologically sound approaches to chemical methods of control. This study evaluates the application of three dynamical measures of controls, namely, green insecticide, mating disruption, and the removal of infected plants, in controlling pest insects. A model was built to describe the interaction between plants and insects as well as the circulation of the pathogen. Optimal control measures are sought in such a way they maximize the healthy plant density jointly with the pests’ density under the lowest possible control efforts. Our simulation study shows that all strategies succeed in controlling the insects. However, a cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that a strategy with two measures of green insecticide and plant removal is the most cost-effective, followed by one which applies all control measures. The best strategy projects the decrease of potential loss from 65.36% to 6.12%. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-cc0fd65fb4844732ba1ec97b3ad0fd08 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2356-6140 1537-744X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | The Scientific World Journal |
spelling | doaj-art-cc0fd65fb4844732ba1ec97b3ad0fd082025-02-03T01:01:43ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2021-01-01202110.1155/2021/66301936630193Optimal Pest Control Strategies with Cost-effectiveness AnalysisIhza Rizkia Fitri0Farida Hanum1Ali Kusnanto2Toni Bakhtiar3Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, Bogor 16680, IndonesiaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, Bogor 16680, IndonesiaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, Bogor 16680, IndonesiaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, Bogor 16680, IndonesiaPest and plant diseases cause damages and economic losses, threatening food security and ecosystem services. Thus, proper pest management is indispensable to mitigate the risk of losses. The risk of environmental hazards induced by toxic chemicals alongside the rapid development of chemical resistance by insects entails more resilient, sustainable, and ecologically sound approaches to chemical methods of control. This study evaluates the application of three dynamical measures of controls, namely, green insecticide, mating disruption, and the removal of infected plants, in controlling pest insects. A model was built to describe the interaction between plants and insects as well as the circulation of the pathogen. Optimal control measures are sought in such a way they maximize the healthy plant density jointly with the pests’ density under the lowest possible control efforts. Our simulation study shows that all strategies succeed in controlling the insects. However, a cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that a strategy with two measures of green insecticide and plant removal is the most cost-effective, followed by one which applies all control measures. The best strategy projects the decrease of potential loss from 65.36% to 6.12%.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6630193 |
spellingShingle | Ihza Rizkia Fitri Farida Hanum Ali Kusnanto Toni Bakhtiar Optimal Pest Control Strategies with Cost-effectiveness Analysis The Scientific World Journal |
title | Optimal Pest Control Strategies with Cost-effectiveness Analysis |
title_full | Optimal Pest Control Strategies with Cost-effectiveness Analysis |
title_fullStr | Optimal Pest Control Strategies with Cost-effectiveness Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal Pest Control Strategies with Cost-effectiveness Analysis |
title_short | Optimal Pest Control Strategies with Cost-effectiveness Analysis |
title_sort | optimal pest control strategies with cost effectiveness analysis |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6630193 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ihzarizkiafitri optimalpestcontrolstrategieswithcosteffectivenessanalysis AT faridahanum optimalpestcontrolstrategieswithcosteffectivenessanalysis AT alikusnanto optimalpestcontrolstrategieswithcosteffectivenessanalysis AT tonibakhtiar optimalpestcontrolstrategieswithcosteffectivenessanalysis |