Optimal Pest Control Strategies with Cost-effectiveness Analysis

Pest and plant diseases cause damages and economic losses, threatening food security and ecosystem services. Thus, proper pest management is indispensable to mitigate the risk of losses. The risk of environmental hazards induced by toxic chemicals alongside the rapid development of chemical resistan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ihza Rizkia Fitri, Farida Hanum, Ali Kusnanto, Toni Bakhtiar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6630193
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832567404803129344
author Ihza Rizkia Fitri
Farida Hanum
Ali Kusnanto
Toni Bakhtiar
author_facet Ihza Rizkia Fitri
Farida Hanum
Ali Kusnanto
Toni Bakhtiar
author_sort Ihza Rizkia Fitri
collection DOAJ
description Pest and plant diseases cause damages and economic losses, threatening food security and ecosystem services. Thus, proper pest management is indispensable to mitigate the risk of losses. The risk of environmental hazards induced by toxic chemicals alongside the rapid development of chemical resistance by insects entails more resilient, sustainable, and ecologically sound approaches to chemical methods of control. This study evaluates the application of three dynamical measures of controls, namely, green insecticide, mating disruption, and the removal of infected plants, in controlling pest insects. A model was built to describe the interaction between plants and insects as well as the circulation of the pathogen. Optimal control measures are sought in such a way they maximize the healthy plant density jointly with the pests’ density under the lowest possible control efforts. Our simulation study shows that all strategies succeed in controlling the insects. However, a cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that a strategy with two measures of green insecticide and plant removal is the most cost-effective, followed by one which applies all control measures. The best strategy projects the decrease of potential loss from 65.36% to 6.12%.
format Article
id doaj-art-cc0fd65fb4844732ba1ec97b3ad0fd08
institution Kabale University
issn 2356-6140
1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-cc0fd65fb4844732ba1ec97b3ad0fd082025-02-03T01:01:43ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2021-01-01202110.1155/2021/66301936630193Optimal Pest Control Strategies with Cost-effectiveness AnalysisIhza Rizkia Fitri0Farida Hanum1Ali Kusnanto2Toni Bakhtiar3Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, Bogor 16680, IndonesiaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, Bogor 16680, IndonesiaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, Bogor 16680, IndonesiaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, Bogor 16680, IndonesiaPest and plant diseases cause damages and economic losses, threatening food security and ecosystem services. Thus, proper pest management is indispensable to mitigate the risk of losses. The risk of environmental hazards induced by toxic chemicals alongside the rapid development of chemical resistance by insects entails more resilient, sustainable, and ecologically sound approaches to chemical methods of control. This study evaluates the application of three dynamical measures of controls, namely, green insecticide, mating disruption, and the removal of infected plants, in controlling pest insects. A model was built to describe the interaction between plants and insects as well as the circulation of the pathogen. Optimal control measures are sought in such a way they maximize the healthy plant density jointly with the pests’ density under the lowest possible control efforts. Our simulation study shows that all strategies succeed in controlling the insects. However, a cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that a strategy with two measures of green insecticide and plant removal is the most cost-effective, followed by one which applies all control measures. The best strategy projects the decrease of potential loss from 65.36% to 6.12%.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6630193
spellingShingle Ihza Rizkia Fitri
Farida Hanum
Ali Kusnanto
Toni Bakhtiar
Optimal Pest Control Strategies with Cost-effectiveness Analysis
The Scientific World Journal
title Optimal Pest Control Strategies with Cost-effectiveness Analysis
title_full Optimal Pest Control Strategies with Cost-effectiveness Analysis
title_fullStr Optimal Pest Control Strategies with Cost-effectiveness Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Pest Control Strategies with Cost-effectiveness Analysis
title_short Optimal Pest Control Strategies with Cost-effectiveness Analysis
title_sort optimal pest control strategies with cost effectiveness analysis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6630193
work_keys_str_mv AT ihzarizkiafitri optimalpestcontrolstrategieswithcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT faridahanum optimalpestcontrolstrategieswithcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT alikusnanto optimalpestcontrolstrategieswithcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT tonibakhtiar optimalpestcontrolstrategieswithcosteffectivenessanalysis