Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty — What Are We to Expect?
The paper analyzes the local total hip arthroplasty (THA) registry database over 18 years, from 2007 to 2024. The following questions were posed. Are there any changes in the structure of revision THA? What are the current trends in revision THA in recent years? What revision technologies are bei...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/viewFile/17697/pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849687551269404672 |
|---|---|
| author | Igor I. Shubnyakov Andrey A. Korytkin Alexey O. Denisov Alisagib A. Dzhavadov Aymen Riahi Maksim S. Guatsaev Rashid M. Tikhilov |
| author_facet | Igor I. Shubnyakov Andrey A. Korytkin Alexey O. Denisov Alisagib A. Dzhavadov Aymen Riahi Maksim S. Guatsaev Rashid M. Tikhilov |
| author_sort | Igor I. Shubnyakov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The paper analyzes the local total hip arthroplasty (THA) registry database over 18 years, from 2007 to 2024.
The following questions were posed. Are there any changes in the structure of revision THA? What are the current trends in revision THA in recent years? What revision technologies are being utilized?
A total of 11.201 cases of revision procedures were analyzed, which accounted for 12.4% of all registered THAs. Compared to previous analyses, the share of early revisions has increased — 42.2% of initial revisions and 87.6% of subsequent re-revisions are performed within the first five years after the previous surgery.
This analysis revealed several important trends:
The significant increase in both the absolute number and proportion of infection-related revisions (40.7%). This share is significantly higher for re-revisions (72.5%) compared to 20.2% for initial revisions.
Rejuvenation of revision — the average age is 60.7 years for aseptic revisions and 58.5 for infection-related ones.
The increase in proportion of trabecular metal constructs and other revision acetabular components, as well as a significant increase (up to 11.9%) of custom-made acetabular implants produced via 3D printing.
For femoral component revision, there is a steady trend towards using Wagner-type tapered fluted titanium components. Their share increased from 39.4% in 2019 to 61.7% in 2024.
There is a sharp increase in the number of revision procedures, a growing proportion of complex revisions requiring advanced and costly implants, and an exceptionally rapid rise in the number of infection-related revisions. It is therefore clear that the challenges of revision arthroplasty may soon affect all surgeons performing primary total hip arthroplasty — initially through the need to manage infectious complications, and later due to the gradual accumulation of patients requiring other types of revisions, including repeat procedures. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-cbf6a3c92b424058bc8f5ce203d78761 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2311-2905 2542-0933 |
| language | Russian |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii |
| spelling | doaj-art-cbf6a3c92b424058bc8f5ce203d787612025-08-20T03:22:18ZrusVreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and OrthopedicsTravmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii2311-29052542-09332025-06-0131213215210.17816/2311-2905-176971412Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty — What Are We to Expect?Igor I. Shubnyakov0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0218-3106Andrey A. Korytkin1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9231-5891Alexey O. Denisov2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0828-7678Alisagib A. Dzhavadov3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6745-4707Aymen Riahi4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8407-5453Maksim S. Guatsaev5https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1948-0895Rashid M. Tikhilov6https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0733-2414Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and OrthopedicsTsivyan Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and OrthopedicsVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and OrthopedicsVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and OrthopedicsVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and OrthopedicsVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and OrthopedicsVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and OrthopedicsThe paper analyzes the local total hip arthroplasty (THA) registry database over 18 years, from 2007 to 2024. The following questions were posed. Are there any changes in the structure of revision THA? What are the current trends in revision THA in recent years? What revision technologies are being utilized? A total of 11.201 cases of revision procedures were analyzed, which accounted for 12.4% of all registered THAs. Compared to previous analyses, the share of early revisions has increased — 42.2% of initial revisions and 87.6% of subsequent re-revisions are performed within the first five years after the previous surgery. This analysis revealed several important trends: The significant increase in both the absolute number and proportion of infection-related revisions (40.7%). This share is significantly higher for re-revisions (72.5%) compared to 20.2% for initial revisions. Rejuvenation of revision — the average age is 60.7 years for aseptic revisions and 58.5 for infection-related ones. The increase in proportion of trabecular metal constructs and other revision acetabular components, as well as a significant increase (up to 11.9%) of custom-made acetabular implants produced via 3D printing. For femoral component revision, there is a steady trend towards using Wagner-type tapered fluted titanium components. Their share increased from 39.4% in 2019 to 61.7% in 2024. There is a sharp increase in the number of revision procedures, a growing proportion of complex revisions requiring advanced and costly implants, and an exceptionally rapid rise in the number of infection-related revisions. It is therefore clear that the challenges of revision arthroplasty may soon affect all surgeons performing primary total hip arthroplasty — initially through the need to manage infectious complications, and later due to the gradual accumulation of patients requiring other types of revisions, including repeat procedures.https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/viewFile/17697/pdfrevision total hip arthroplastyarthroplasty registries |
| spellingShingle | Igor I. Shubnyakov Andrey A. Korytkin Alexey O. Denisov Alisagib A. Dzhavadov Aymen Riahi Maksim S. Guatsaev Rashid M. Tikhilov Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty — What Are We to Expect? Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii revision total hip arthroplasty arthroplasty registries |
| title | Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty — What Are We to Expect? |
| title_full | Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty — What Are We to Expect? |
| title_fullStr | Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty — What Are We to Expect? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty — What Are We to Expect? |
| title_short | Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty — What Are We to Expect? |
| title_sort | revision total hip arthroplasty what are we to expect |
| topic | revision total hip arthroplasty arthroplasty registries |
| url | https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/viewFile/17697/pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT igorishubnyakov revisiontotalhiparthroplastywhatarewetoexpect AT andreyakorytkin revisiontotalhiparthroplastywhatarewetoexpect AT alexeyodenisov revisiontotalhiparthroplastywhatarewetoexpect AT alisagibadzhavadov revisiontotalhiparthroplastywhatarewetoexpect AT aymenriahi revisiontotalhiparthroplastywhatarewetoexpect AT maksimsguatsaev revisiontotalhiparthroplastywhatarewetoexpect AT rashidmtikhilov revisiontotalhiparthroplastywhatarewetoexpect |