Transverse Expansion and Stability after Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy versus Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion: a Systematic Review

Objectives: The objective of the present systematic review was to test the hypothesis of no difference in transverse skeletal and dental arch expansion and relapse after segmental Le Fort I osteotomy versus surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Material and Methods: A MEDLINE (PubMed), E...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Starch-Jensen, Tue Lindberg Blæhr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Odontology 2017-01-01
Series:eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2016/4/e1/v7n4e1ht.htm
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850044898806333440
author Thomas Starch-Jensen
Tue Lindberg Blæhr
author_facet Thomas Starch-Jensen
Tue Lindberg Blæhr
author_sort Thomas Starch-Jensen
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: The objective of the present systematic review was to test the hypothesis of no difference in transverse skeletal and dental arch expansion and relapse after segmental Le Fort I osteotomy versus surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Material and Methods: A MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane library search in combination with a hand-search of relevant journals was conducted by including human studies published in English from January 1, 2000 to June 1, 2016. Results: The search provided 130 titles and four studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All the included studies were characterized by high risk of bias and meta-analysis was not possible due to considerable variation. Both treatment modalities significantly increase the transverse maxillary skeletal and dental arch width. The transverse dental arch expansion and relapse seems to be substantial higher with tooth-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion compared to segmental Le Fort I osteotomy. The ratio of dental to skeletal relapse was significantly higher in the posterior maxilla with tooth-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Moreover, a parallel opening without segment tilting was observed after segmental Le Fort I osteotomy. Conclusions: Maxillary transverse deficiency in adults can be treated successfully with both treatment modalities, although surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion seems more effective when large transverse maxillary skeletal and dental arch expansion is required. However, considering the methodological limitations of the included studies, long-term randomized studies assessing transverse skeletal and dental expansion and relapse with the two treatment modalities are needed before definite conclusions can be provided.
format Article
id doaj-art-cbbbc465f5b94ea39757381d3341a2d7
institution DOAJ
issn 2029-283X
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Odontology
record_format Article
series eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research
spelling doaj-art-cbbbc465f5b94ea39757381d3341a2d72025-08-20T02:54:49ZengLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of OdontologyeJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research2029-283X2017-01-0174e110.5037/jomr.2016.7401Transverse Expansion and Stability after Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy versus Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion: a Systematic ReviewThomas Starch-JensenTue Lindberg BlæhrObjectives: The objective of the present systematic review was to test the hypothesis of no difference in transverse skeletal and dental arch expansion and relapse after segmental Le Fort I osteotomy versus surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Material and Methods: A MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane library search in combination with a hand-search of relevant journals was conducted by including human studies published in English from January 1, 2000 to June 1, 2016. Results: The search provided 130 titles and four studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All the included studies were characterized by high risk of bias and meta-analysis was not possible due to considerable variation. Both treatment modalities significantly increase the transverse maxillary skeletal and dental arch width. The transverse dental arch expansion and relapse seems to be substantial higher with tooth-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion compared to segmental Le Fort I osteotomy. The ratio of dental to skeletal relapse was significantly higher in the posterior maxilla with tooth-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Moreover, a parallel opening without segment tilting was observed after segmental Le Fort I osteotomy. Conclusions: Maxillary transverse deficiency in adults can be treated successfully with both treatment modalities, although surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion seems more effective when large transverse maxillary skeletal and dental arch expansion is required. However, considering the methodological limitations of the included studies, long-term randomized studies assessing transverse skeletal and dental expansion and relapse with the two treatment modalities are needed before definite conclusions can be provided.http://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2016/4/e1/v7n4e1ht.htmorthodonticsorthognathic surgerypalatal expansion techniquereview
spellingShingle Thomas Starch-Jensen
Tue Lindberg Blæhr
Transverse Expansion and Stability after Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy versus Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion: a Systematic Review
eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research
orthodontics
orthognathic surgery
palatal expansion technique
review
title Transverse Expansion and Stability after Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy versus Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion: a Systematic Review
title_full Transverse Expansion and Stability after Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy versus Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion: a Systematic Review
title_fullStr Transverse Expansion and Stability after Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy versus Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion: a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Transverse Expansion and Stability after Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy versus Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion: a Systematic Review
title_short Transverse Expansion and Stability after Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy versus Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion: a Systematic Review
title_sort transverse expansion and stability after segmental le fort i osteotomy versus surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion a systematic review
topic orthodontics
orthognathic surgery
palatal expansion technique
review
url http://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2016/4/e1/v7n4e1ht.htm
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasstarchjensen transverseexpansionandstabilityaftersegmentallefortiosteotomyversussurgicallyassistedrapidmaxillaryexpansionasystematicreview
AT tuelindbergblæhr transverseexpansionandstabilityaftersegmentallefortiosteotomyversussurgicallyassistedrapidmaxillaryexpansionasystematicreview