Clinical efficacy and learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for symptomatic cervical spondylotic radiculopathy

Abstract Background This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (PECD) in treating patients with symptomatic cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). Methods A total of 105 patients with single-segment symptomatic CSR treated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiao Sun, Lijuan Zhan, Zhongxin Tang, Mingkui Shen, Haijun Ma, Jun Tan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-02-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05530-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861843470319616
author Xiao Sun
Lijuan Zhan
Zhongxin Tang
Mingkui Shen
Haijun Ma
Jun Tan
author_facet Xiao Sun
Lijuan Zhan
Zhongxin Tang
Mingkui Shen
Haijun Ma
Jun Tan
author_sort Xiao Sun
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (PECD) in treating patients with symptomatic cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). Methods A total of 105 patients with single-segment symptomatic CSR treated between January 2020 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into PECD and ACDF groups based on the surgical approach. Patient demographics, operation time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, complications, postoperative hospital stay, total hospitalization cost, neck dysfunction index (NDI), arm and neck visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared and analyzed. The learning curve of the PECD group was assessed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. Results There was no statistically significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P > 0.05). The PECD group had shorter operative time, smaller incision length, less estimated intraoperative bleeding, lower total hospitalization costs, and shorter postoperative hospital stays compared to the ACDF group (P < 0.05). Postoperative NDI, arm VAS, and neck VAS scores improved significantly in both groups compared to preoperative values (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found between the two groups during the same period (P > 0.05). There were also no significant differences between the PECD and ACDF groups in the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, complications, or surgical success rates (P > 0.05). As more cases accumulated, a trend toward shorter operative times was observed in the PECD group. When grouped according to the learning curve, with the 23rd case as the cutoff point, there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the learning phase and proficient phase groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions PECD is a safe and effective procedure for treating single-segment CSR, offering clinical outcomes comparable to ACDF. PECD has a notable learning curve, requiring beginners to perform 23 cases to reach proficiency. However, longer operative times do not negatively impact preclinical outcomes. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.
format Article
id doaj-art-cb7590fb744242ff8184ce8b0c972555
institution Kabale University
issn 1749-799X
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj-art-cb7590fb744242ff8184ce8b0c9725552025-02-09T12:46:55ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2025-02-012011910.1186/s13018-025-05530-8Clinical efficacy and learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for symptomatic cervical spondylotic radiculopathyXiao Sun0Lijuan Zhan1Zhongxin Tang2Mingkui Shen3Haijun Ma4Jun Tan5Department of Mini-invasive Spinal Surgery, The Third People’s Hospital of Henan ProvinceDepartment of Neurology, People’s Hospital of ZhengzhouDepartment of Mini-invasive Spinal Surgery, The Third People’s Hospital of Henan ProvinceDepartment of Mini-invasive Spinal Surgery, The Third People’s Hospital of Henan ProvinceDepartment of Mini-invasive Spinal Surgery, The Third People’s Hospital of Henan ProvinceDepartment of Mini-invasive Spinal Surgery, The Third People’s Hospital of Henan ProvinceAbstract Background This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (PECD) in treating patients with symptomatic cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). Methods A total of 105 patients with single-segment symptomatic CSR treated between January 2020 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into PECD and ACDF groups based on the surgical approach. Patient demographics, operation time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, complications, postoperative hospital stay, total hospitalization cost, neck dysfunction index (NDI), arm and neck visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared and analyzed. The learning curve of the PECD group was assessed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. Results There was no statistically significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P > 0.05). The PECD group had shorter operative time, smaller incision length, less estimated intraoperative bleeding, lower total hospitalization costs, and shorter postoperative hospital stays compared to the ACDF group (P < 0.05). Postoperative NDI, arm VAS, and neck VAS scores improved significantly in both groups compared to preoperative values (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found between the two groups during the same period (P > 0.05). There were also no significant differences between the PECD and ACDF groups in the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, complications, or surgical success rates (P > 0.05). As more cases accumulated, a trend toward shorter operative times was observed in the PECD group. When grouped according to the learning curve, with the 23rd case as the cutoff point, there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the learning phase and proficient phase groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions PECD is a safe and effective procedure for treating single-segment CSR, offering clinical outcomes comparable to ACDF. PECD has a notable learning curve, requiring beginners to perform 23 cases to reach proficiency. However, longer operative times do not negatively impact preclinical outcomes. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05530-8Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomyCervical spondylotic radiculopathyAnterior cervical discectomy and fusionLearning curveEndoscopic spinal surgery
spellingShingle Xiao Sun
Lijuan Zhan
Zhongxin Tang
Mingkui Shen
Haijun Ma
Jun Tan
Clinical efficacy and learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for symptomatic cervical spondylotic radiculopathy
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy
Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
Learning curve
Endoscopic spinal surgery
title Clinical efficacy and learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for symptomatic cervical spondylotic radiculopathy
title_full Clinical efficacy and learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for symptomatic cervical spondylotic radiculopathy
title_fullStr Clinical efficacy and learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for symptomatic cervical spondylotic radiculopathy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical efficacy and learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for symptomatic cervical spondylotic radiculopathy
title_short Clinical efficacy and learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for symptomatic cervical spondylotic radiculopathy
title_sort clinical efficacy and learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for symptomatic cervical spondylotic radiculopathy
topic Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy
Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
Learning curve
Endoscopic spinal surgery
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05530-8
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaosun clinicalefficacyandlearningcurveofpercutaneousendoscopiccervicaldiscectomyforsymptomaticcervicalspondyloticradiculopathy
AT lijuanzhan clinicalefficacyandlearningcurveofpercutaneousendoscopiccervicaldiscectomyforsymptomaticcervicalspondyloticradiculopathy
AT zhongxintang clinicalefficacyandlearningcurveofpercutaneousendoscopiccervicaldiscectomyforsymptomaticcervicalspondyloticradiculopathy
AT mingkuishen clinicalefficacyandlearningcurveofpercutaneousendoscopiccervicaldiscectomyforsymptomaticcervicalspondyloticradiculopathy
AT haijunma clinicalefficacyandlearningcurveofpercutaneousendoscopiccervicaldiscectomyforsymptomaticcervicalspondyloticradiculopathy
AT juntan clinicalefficacyandlearningcurveofpercutaneousendoscopiccervicaldiscectomyforsymptomaticcervicalspondyloticradiculopathy