Comparison of Apgar scores in breech presentations between vaginal and cesarean delivery

Objective: The mode of delivery in breech presentation (BP) is controversial. Several studies have reported the advantages and disadvantages of delivery mode in BP. The aim of this study was to compare the Apgar scores in BPs between vaginal and cesarean delivery. Materials and Methods: A retrospect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonny Karunia Fajar, Mohd Andalas, Harapan Harapan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.tcmjmed.com/article.asp?issn=1016-3190;year=2017;volume=29;issue=1;spage=24;epage=29;aulast=Fajar
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850173581718192128
author Jonny Karunia Fajar
Mohd Andalas
Harapan Harapan
author_facet Jonny Karunia Fajar
Mohd Andalas
Harapan Harapan
author_sort Jonny Karunia Fajar
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The mode of delivery in breech presentation (BP) is controversial. Several studies have reported the advantages and disadvantages of delivery mode in BP. The aim of this study was to compare the Apgar scores in BPs between vaginal and cesarean delivery. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at Dr. Zainoel Abidin General Hospital from January 2010 to December 2012. Data on the mode of delivery and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min for infants with a BP were extracted from the medical records. Logistic regression was employed to assess the correlation between mode of delivery and Apgar scores. In addition, a meta-analysis was conducted to summarize findings from other regions. Results: A total of 205 (3.9%) BPs among 5252 deliveries between January 2010 and December 2012 were analyzed for this study. There were 26% (52 cases) vaginal and 74% (153 cases) cesarean deliveries. The mode of delivery for BP had a significant association with Apgar score at 1 min (odds ratio [OR] 95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.462 [2.476–16.870], P = 0.0001) and 5 min (OR 95% CI =7.727 [1.416–42.175], P = 0.018). Our meta-analysis showed that the delivery mode had a significant association with Apgar score in BP (OR: 3.69; 95% CI: 2.18–6.26, P = 0.0001). Conclusions: There was a significant association between Apgar scores in BPs and mode of delivery. Our results suggest better outcomes for cesarean than vaginal delivery in BPs.
format Article
id doaj-art-cb46440ba6b949d09c65139960eef0c6
institution OA Journals
issn 1016-3190
2223-8956
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Tzu Chi Medical Journal
spelling doaj-art-cb46440ba6b949d09c65139960eef0c62025-08-20T02:19:48ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsTzu Chi Medical Journal1016-31902223-89562017-01-01291242910.4103/tcmj.tcmj_5_17Comparison of Apgar scores in breech presentations between vaginal and cesarean deliveryJonny Karunia FajarMohd AndalasHarapan HarapanObjective: The mode of delivery in breech presentation (BP) is controversial. Several studies have reported the advantages and disadvantages of delivery mode in BP. The aim of this study was to compare the Apgar scores in BPs between vaginal and cesarean delivery. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at Dr. Zainoel Abidin General Hospital from January 2010 to December 2012. Data on the mode of delivery and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min for infants with a BP were extracted from the medical records. Logistic regression was employed to assess the correlation between mode of delivery and Apgar scores. In addition, a meta-analysis was conducted to summarize findings from other regions. Results: A total of 205 (3.9%) BPs among 5252 deliveries between January 2010 and December 2012 were analyzed for this study. There were 26% (52 cases) vaginal and 74% (153 cases) cesarean deliveries. The mode of delivery for BP had a significant association with Apgar score at 1 min (odds ratio [OR] 95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.462 [2.476–16.870], P = 0.0001) and 5 min (OR 95% CI =7.727 [1.416–42.175], P = 0.018). Our meta-analysis showed that the delivery mode had a significant association with Apgar score in BP (OR: 3.69; 95% CI: 2.18–6.26, P = 0.0001). Conclusions: There was a significant association between Apgar scores in BPs and mode of delivery. Our results suggest better outcomes for cesarean than vaginal delivery in BPs.http://www.tcmjmed.com/article.asp?issn=1016-3190;year=2017;volume=29;issue=1;spage=24;epage=29;aulast=FajarApgar scoreBreech presentationCesarean deliveryVaginal delivery
spellingShingle Jonny Karunia Fajar
Mohd Andalas
Harapan Harapan
Comparison of Apgar scores in breech presentations between vaginal and cesarean delivery
Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Apgar score
Breech presentation
Cesarean delivery
Vaginal delivery
title Comparison of Apgar scores in breech presentations between vaginal and cesarean delivery
title_full Comparison of Apgar scores in breech presentations between vaginal and cesarean delivery
title_fullStr Comparison of Apgar scores in breech presentations between vaginal and cesarean delivery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Apgar scores in breech presentations between vaginal and cesarean delivery
title_short Comparison of Apgar scores in breech presentations between vaginal and cesarean delivery
title_sort comparison of apgar scores in breech presentations between vaginal and cesarean delivery
topic Apgar score
Breech presentation
Cesarean delivery
Vaginal delivery
url http://www.tcmjmed.com/article.asp?issn=1016-3190;year=2017;volume=29;issue=1;spage=24;epage=29;aulast=Fajar
work_keys_str_mv AT jonnykaruniafajar comparisonofapgarscoresinbreechpresentationsbetweenvaginalandcesareandelivery
AT mohdandalas comparisonofapgarscoresinbreechpresentationsbetweenvaginalandcesareandelivery
AT harapanharapan comparisonofapgarscoresinbreechpresentationsbetweenvaginalandcesareandelivery