Effect of Surface Treatments on the Repair of a Hybrid Ceramic through the Microtensile Test

Abstract This study evaluated the microtensile bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and a composite resin under different surface treatments and aging. Hybrid ceramic blocks were divided into five groups based on surface treatment and thermocycling: HF: 5% hydrofluoric acid; HFS: hydrofluoric acid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cristiane Mayumi Inagati, Jonas V. M. Rodrigues, Manassés T. V. Grangeiro, Natália R. Rossi, Lilian C. Anami, Guilherme de S. F. A. Saavedra, Rodrigo O. de Assunção e Souza, Renata M. de M. Marinho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Cerâmica 2025-03-01
Series:Cerâmica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0366-69132025000100306&lng=en&tlng=en
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract This study evaluated the microtensile bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and a composite resin under different surface treatments and aging. Hybrid ceramic blocks were divided into five groups based on surface treatment and thermocycling: HF: 5% hydrofluoric acid; HFS: hydrofluoric acid and silane; A110S: sandblasting with aluminum oxide and silicatization; A50: aluminum oxide particle blasting; R: roughening. All samples were cemented to composite resin. After 24-hour storage in distilled water at 37ºC, the blocks were cut into sticks and tested immediately or after 10,000 cycles. Microtensile bond strength was tested using a universal testing machine. Failure modes were visualized and classified as cohesive, adhesive, and predominantly adhesive. Statistical differences were found between groups for surface treatment and thermocycling (p<0.05). Hybrid ceramics showed higher bond strength when etched with hydrofluoric acid and silanized, but bond strength decreased after thermocycling in all groups.
ISSN:1678-4553