The Effects of Maternal Mirroring on the Development of Infant Social Expressiveness: The Case of Infant Cleft Lip

Parent-infant social interactions start early in development, with infants showing active communicative expressions by just two months. A key question is how this social capacity develops. Maternal mirroring of infant expressions is considered an important, intuitive, parenting response, but evidenc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lynne Murray, Laura Bozicevic, Pier Francesco Ferrari, Kyla Vaillancourt, Louise Dalton, Tim Goodacre, Bhismadev Chakrabarti, Sarah Bicknell, Peter Cooper, Alan Stein, Leonardo De Pascalis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Neural Plasticity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5314657
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850174599655849984
author Lynne Murray
Laura Bozicevic
Pier Francesco Ferrari
Kyla Vaillancourt
Louise Dalton
Tim Goodacre
Bhismadev Chakrabarti
Sarah Bicknell
Peter Cooper
Alan Stein
Leonardo De Pascalis
author_facet Lynne Murray
Laura Bozicevic
Pier Francesco Ferrari
Kyla Vaillancourt
Louise Dalton
Tim Goodacre
Bhismadev Chakrabarti
Sarah Bicknell
Peter Cooper
Alan Stein
Leonardo De Pascalis
author_sort Lynne Murray
collection DOAJ
description Parent-infant social interactions start early in development, with infants showing active communicative expressions by just two months. A key question is how this social capacity develops. Maternal mirroring of infant expressions is considered an important, intuitive, parenting response, but evidence is sparse in the first two months concerning the conditions under which mirroring occurs and its developmental sequelae, including in clinical samples where the infant’s social expressiveness may be affected. We investigated these questions by comparing the development of mother-infant interactions between a sample where the infant had cleft lip and a normal, unaffected, comparison sample. We videotaped dyads in their homes five times from one to ten weeks and used a microanalytic coding scheme for maternal and infant behaviours, including infant social expressions, and maternal mirroring and marking responses. We also recorded maternal gaze to the infant, using eye-tracking glasses. Although infants with cleft lip did show communicative behaviours, the rate of their development was slower than in comparison infants. This group difference was mediated by a lower rate of mirroring of infant expressions by mothers of infants with cleft lip; this effect was, in turn, partly accounted for by reduced gaze to the infant’s mouth, although the clarity of infant social expressions (indexed by cleft severity) and maternal self-blame regarding the cleft were also influential. Results indicate the robustness of parent-infant interactions but also their sensitivity to specific variations in interactants’ appearance and behaviour. Parental mirroring appears critical in infant social development, likely supported by the mirror neuron system and underlying clinical and, possibly, cultural differences in infant behaviour. These findings suggest new avenues for clinical intervention.
format Article
id doaj-art-cadfcea64fd74b1d82337400ee71d3e3
institution OA Journals
issn 2090-5904
1687-5443
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Neural Plasticity
spelling doaj-art-cadfcea64fd74b1d82337400ee71d3e32025-08-20T02:19:37ZengWileyNeural Plasticity2090-59041687-54432018-01-01201810.1155/2018/53146575314657The Effects of Maternal Mirroring on the Development of Infant Social Expressiveness: The Case of Infant Cleft LipLynne Murray0Laura Bozicevic1Pier Francesco Ferrari2Kyla Vaillancourt3Louise Dalton4Tim Goodacre5Bhismadev Chakrabarti6Sarah Bicknell7Peter Cooper8Alan Stein9Leonardo De Pascalis10School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, UKSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, UKInstitut des Sciences, Cognitives, Marc Jeannerod CNRS, Bron, FranceSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, UKSpires Cleft Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UKSpires Cleft Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UKSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, UKSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, UKSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, UKDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UKSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, UKParent-infant social interactions start early in development, with infants showing active communicative expressions by just two months. A key question is how this social capacity develops. Maternal mirroring of infant expressions is considered an important, intuitive, parenting response, but evidence is sparse in the first two months concerning the conditions under which mirroring occurs and its developmental sequelae, including in clinical samples where the infant’s social expressiveness may be affected. We investigated these questions by comparing the development of mother-infant interactions between a sample where the infant had cleft lip and a normal, unaffected, comparison sample. We videotaped dyads in their homes five times from one to ten weeks and used a microanalytic coding scheme for maternal and infant behaviours, including infant social expressions, and maternal mirroring and marking responses. We also recorded maternal gaze to the infant, using eye-tracking glasses. Although infants with cleft lip did show communicative behaviours, the rate of their development was slower than in comparison infants. This group difference was mediated by a lower rate of mirroring of infant expressions by mothers of infants with cleft lip; this effect was, in turn, partly accounted for by reduced gaze to the infant’s mouth, although the clarity of infant social expressions (indexed by cleft severity) and maternal self-blame regarding the cleft were also influential. Results indicate the robustness of parent-infant interactions but also their sensitivity to specific variations in interactants’ appearance and behaviour. Parental mirroring appears critical in infant social development, likely supported by the mirror neuron system and underlying clinical and, possibly, cultural differences in infant behaviour. These findings suggest new avenues for clinical intervention.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5314657
spellingShingle Lynne Murray
Laura Bozicevic
Pier Francesco Ferrari
Kyla Vaillancourt
Louise Dalton
Tim Goodacre
Bhismadev Chakrabarti
Sarah Bicknell
Peter Cooper
Alan Stein
Leonardo De Pascalis
The Effects of Maternal Mirroring on the Development of Infant Social Expressiveness: The Case of Infant Cleft Lip
Neural Plasticity
title The Effects of Maternal Mirroring on the Development of Infant Social Expressiveness: The Case of Infant Cleft Lip
title_full The Effects of Maternal Mirroring on the Development of Infant Social Expressiveness: The Case of Infant Cleft Lip
title_fullStr The Effects of Maternal Mirroring on the Development of Infant Social Expressiveness: The Case of Infant Cleft Lip
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Maternal Mirroring on the Development of Infant Social Expressiveness: The Case of Infant Cleft Lip
title_short The Effects of Maternal Mirroring on the Development of Infant Social Expressiveness: The Case of Infant Cleft Lip
title_sort effects of maternal mirroring on the development of infant social expressiveness the case of infant cleft lip
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5314657
work_keys_str_mv AT lynnemurray theeffectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT laurabozicevic theeffectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT pierfrancescoferrari theeffectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT kylavaillancourt theeffectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT louisedalton theeffectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT timgoodacre theeffectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT bhismadevchakrabarti theeffectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT sarahbicknell theeffectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT petercooper theeffectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT alanstein theeffectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT leonardodepascalis theeffectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT lynnemurray effectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT laurabozicevic effectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT pierfrancescoferrari effectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT kylavaillancourt effectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT louisedalton effectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT timgoodacre effectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT bhismadevchakrabarti effectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT sarahbicknell effectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT petercooper effectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT alanstein effectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip
AT leonardodepascalis effectsofmaternalmirroringonthedevelopmentofinfantsocialexpressivenessthecaseofinfantcleftlip