Transparency, quality, and statistical consistency of meta-analytic systematic reviews in clinical child and adolescent psychology (2022–2024): study protocol for a meta-review
Meta-analytic systematic reviews are crucial for advancing research and practice in Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology (CCAP). Despite their importance, there has been no systematic investigation into transparency- and quality-related aspects of these reviews in leading CCAP journals. This stu...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Magdalena Siegel, Selina Fanninger, Julia Riedel, Martina Zemp |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1535606/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Same data, different analysts: variation in effect sizes due to analytical decisions in ecology and evolutionary biology
by: Elliot Gould, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
A metric of knowledge as information compression reflects reproducibility predictions for biomedical experiments
by: Daniele Fanelli, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
How can meta-research be used to evaluate and improve the quality of research in the field of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine?
by: Jeremy Y. Ng, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01) -
Nonsignificance misinterpreted as an effect’s absence in psychology: prevalence and temporal analyses
by: Stephen Lee Murphy, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
A produção acadêmica acerca dos desastres tecnológicos da mineração em Mariana e Brumadinho (Minas Gerais)
by: Alfredo Costa, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01)