Transport equity assessment based on accessibility disparities in terms of multi-job opportunities across Beijing

Abstract Evaluating equal access to opportunities across social groups is an important aspect of transport equity research, but existing schemes rarely focus on accessibility to specific opportunities for specific groups. This study distinguishes between different education groups and job sectors wh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhengbing Liu, Zhonglei Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-08-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15399-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849226455874011136
author Zhengbing Liu
Zhonglei Yu
author_facet Zhengbing Liu
Zhonglei Yu
author_sort Zhengbing Liu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Evaluating equal access to opportunities across social groups is an important aspect of transport equity research, but existing schemes rarely focus on accessibility to specific opportunities for specific groups. This study distinguishes between different education groups and job sectors which come from Nation Census Statistics and National Economic Census, respectively, with the aim of evaluating transport equity in Beijing by examining the disparity between high- and low-education groups in accessing job opportunities of specific sectors with different education requirements. Using the bivariate local spatial autocorrelation model to reveal the relationship between provision of accessibility and the population quantity of different groups in regions based on different transport modes. Regions with low accessibility level but high groups numbers may rise to inequity of transport. It was found that high-education groups had more equal accessibility to high-education job opportunities than low-education groups had in their access to low-education jobs. In terms of diversity of opportunity, the differences in job accessibility between low- and high-education groups tended to diminish, and equity in accessibility was also improved. Disadvantaged areas with high population demands for jobs exhibited lower accessibility levels by public transport compared to car travel, and more of the low-education groups were located in disadvantaged areas and obtained fewer opportunities, particularly for the groups without Hukou status. Diversity of opportunity helped to reduce the difference between car travel and public transport in disadvantaged areas, and also decreased the inequities in accessibility among different educational groups. To improve transport equity, it is recommended to prioritize public transport in fringe areas and disadvantaged areas, and the development of multi-job sectors in these areas should be undertaken to cater to the demands of different education groups.
format Article
id doaj-art-ca667a347a044389b04508f5fbf3a419
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-ca667a347a044389b04508f5fbf3a4192025-08-24T11:21:02ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-08-0115112510.1038/s41598-025-15399-6Transport equity assessment based on accessibility disparities in terms of multi-job opportunities across BeijingZhengbing Liu0Zhonglei Yu1School of Geographic Sciences, Xinyang Normal UniversityFaculty of Geographical Science and Engineering & Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development, Henan UniversityAbstract Evaluating equal access to opportunities across social groups is an important aspect of transport equity research, but existing schemes rarely focus on accessibility to specific opportunities for specific groups. This study distinguishes between different education groups and job sectors which come from Nation Census Statistics and National Economic Census, respectively, with the aim of evaluating transport equity in Beijing by examining the disparity between high- and low-education groups in accessing job opportunities of specific sectors with different education requirements. Using the bivariate local spatial autocorrelation model to reveal the relationship between provision of accessibility and the population quantity of different groups in regions based on different transport modes. Regions with low accessibility level but high groups numbers may rise to inequity of transport. It was found that high-education groups had more equal accessibility to high-education job opportunities than low-education groups had in their access to low-education jobs. In terms of diversity of opportunity, the differences in job accessibility between low- and high-education groups tended to diminish, and equity in accessibility was also improved. Disadvantaged areas with high population demands for jobs exhibited lower accessibility levels by public transport compared to car travel, and more of the low-education groups were located in disadvantaged areas and obtained fewer opportunities, particularly for the groups without Hukou status. Diversity of opportunity helped to reduce the difference between car travel and public transport in disadvantaged areas, and also decreased the inequities in accessibility among different educational groups. To improve transport equity, it is recommended to prioritize public transport in fringe areas and disadvantaged areas, and the development of multi-job sectors in these areas should be undertaken to cater to the demands of different education groups.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15399-6Transport equityAccessibilityDiversityDisparity
spellingShingle Zhengbing Liu
Zhonglei Yu
Transport equity assessment based on accessibility disparities in terms of multi-job opportunities across Beijing
Scientific Reports
Transport equity
Accessibility
Diversity
Disparity
title Transport equity assessment based on accessibility disparities in terms of multi-job opportunities across Beijing
title_full Transport equity assessment based on accessibility disparities in terms of multi-job opportunities across Beijing
title_fullStr Transport equity assessment based on accessibility disparities in terms of multi-job opportunities across Beijing
title_full_unstemmed Transport equity assessment based on accessibility disparities in terms of multi-job opportunities across Beijing
title_short Transport equity assessment based on accessibility disparities in terms of multi-job opportunities across Beijing
title_sort transport equity assessment based on accessibility disparities in terms of multi job opportunities across beijing
topic Transport equity
Accessibility
Diversity
Disparity
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15399-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengbingliu transportequityassessmentbasedonaccessibilitydisparitiesintermsofmultijobopportunitiesacrossbeijing
AT zhongleiyu transportequityassessmentbasedonaccessibilitydisparitiesintermsofmultijobopportunitiesacrossbeijing